Speech by Itself Cannot be Racism. It is Conduct (Evicting, Miseducating, Incarcerating, Denying, Firing, Deceiving, etc) Elites Use Their Weaponized Definition of Racism to Salvage Kamala's Campaign

Through its use of single source propaganda elites are desperately using the Dependent Media to manufacture public hysteria around comments made by Trump surrogates at his well attended rally at Madison Square Garden in downtown NYC, the mecca for white liberals. [MORE] Here, “single source propaganda” refers to the uniformity of the entire mainstream media covering the same information in the same manner without any dissent or contradiction - a synchronization that seeks mass conformity, uncritical examination of information, obedience and artificial dogmatic acceptance - sometimes it has a laugh track (SNL). Do a Google search. Its hard to miss because its all over social media and television - liberal pundits chattering about “racism” and so-called “racist comments.” However, as with other terms used by elite white liberals, such as “freedom” (they mean choices presented to you by a government) “rights” (given by a government if you’re worthy, not inherent freedom), “vaccines” (that don’t immunize or stop the spread), the term racism is used to mean bad words like nigger, mean thoughts, stereotypes and affiliation with clownish groups. In reality, racism has little to do with such things. As Neely Fuller explained, “I don’t care about white people calling me nigger. I am concerned with what they want to do to a nigger or what they do with people whom they think are niggers.” Doing, not talking is the operable word there (obviously criminal threats to harm and actionable words to defraud and deceive can be racist). Liberals have deceived Black people about racism for their own political purposes - among other things, their deception has caused Black people to try to solve the wrong problems and to align themselves with the wrong persons and causes. This deception has caused substantial harm; the results speak for themselves as the State of Black America reveals that Black people haven’t progressed since 1965. The Black-White disparity persists across virtually every line or indicator of life and quality of life in the United States. Black people occupy the bottom of nearly every statistical category. In fact, racism cannot be addressed if we don’t even understand it and continue on with this nonsense.

It takes a profound sense of denial or a Zombie mind to not see the vast unequal power between white and Black people and the master-servant relations between the two. 90% of the world's population of 7 billion people are non-white. Nevertheless, as Dr. Bobby Wright states, 'everywhere one finds Whites and Blacks in close proximity to each other, the whites are in control. Blacks rarely question this extraordinary universal phenomenon which defies every known statistical law of probability.' [MORE] Dr. Amos Wilson observes, although Europeans are only 10% of the worlds population and inhabit only small parts of the globe that are relatively RESOURCE-LESS compared to non-European countries, nevertheless, the European is saddled with GREAT WEALTH, economic and political power and controls the globe.’

In general, Black people function as “a powerless class” having no power independent of elite whites. In nearly all the metro areas where the majority of Black people reside in the US, elite whites control and own all major resources (such as banks, local mainstream media, major real estate, ports, utilities, large corporations and businesses, all major industry, major non-profits, unions, hospitals, etc) and own most major real estate and anything else of substantial material value. Neely Fuller explains that most elite whites are racist or perpetuate racism. He further explains, ‘in a socio-material system dominated by wealthy, powerful racists, all major decisions involving non-white people are made by elite white. In such places elite whites function as the major decision makers in regards to what happens or does not happen to non-white people, particularly Blacks and Latinos.’ Elite whites are their employers, landlords, creditors, land owners, supervisors, bosses and major decision-makers. Fuller states, ‘Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by elite whites. This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism) that many Black people prefer not to acknowledge.’ [MORE] Thus, in their direct or indirect relations with elite whites, most black people function as their employees, workers, consumers, leasees, helpers, servants, tenants, patients, clients and customers, etc. Dr. Amos Wilson describes elite whites as basically “soul controllers” of Black people who project, create and control them through reward and punishment like mice in Skinner’s lab. He rhetorically asks;

Who has control of your food? Who has control of your electricity? Who has control of your water? Of your jobs? Who tells you what to wear when you go to work? Who tells you when to come to work...when to leave...when to go to lunch...how to speak...how to write...how to do this...how to do that...and how are these things taught, and how they are conditioned?"-- It is by reward and punishment. " You do this you get paid; you don't do this you don't get paid; you get a raise, you get docked. What do we have here?’

Contrary to liberal whitenology, racists use the granfalloon of race to dominate and control Black people - hate and mean words have little to do with it; master-servant relations are the gravamen of the system of racism white supremacy - not mere bigotry, overt hatred or affiliation with bad groups, such as the KKK or Nazis.

Elite whites have deceived Black people with language and confused the words bigotry as racism and used the terms interchangeably to further their own political goals. Elite liberals in particular (scholars, publishers, professionals, pundits and media probots, puppeticians and the Black rolebots who parrot them) go on chattering about racism as mean words or hateful attitudes by bad actors or slurs, stereotypes, disrespect, affiliation with clown groups (Nazis, KKK etc.) or as isolated acts of discrimination. Said vested interests cleverly push the belief that racism is mere words not collective conduct by white people and that racial disparity occurs automatically as simply a consequence of an invisible system with anonymous, unconsciously acting actors. Elite white liberals often use the charge of “racism,” (though they never actually define it) offensively (playing the race card) for their own political goals. As explained by Wilson, particularly during election times, Black people and their welfare are not the end of the electoral process but merely the means for winning office or achieving some political goal that empowers Democrats not Black people or their communities.

All white people are not racist, but the permanent existence of the system of racism white supremacy itself is substantial evidence that most white people are (or the most powerful white people are). Most white people believe they are superior to black people. The reason that most white people believe they are superior to Black people is because they have white skin. That is, they believe in an imaginary human hierarchy in which whites are supreme and Blacks are the most inferior. Accordingly, most white people (racists) seek to have or approve of, master-servant relations with Black people. If you know this about white people, you need know little else. If you do not know this about white people, virtually all else that you know about them will only confuse you. The cooperative, master-servant relationship between whites and Black people is a main source of Black people’s problems.

Dolly Want a Cracker? Elite Whites Speaking Through a Dummy is Not Black Power, Its Elite White Power: All 3 Questions at Kamala’s Town Hall in Michigan were PreDetermined, Admits Moderator

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

Probot – a propagandizing programmed robot. A representative from an organization, agency or institution, especially the Internal Revenue Service, Pentagon, State Department, or Blight House, whose assignment is to make prepared statements and answer “cooked” (prepared) questions at news conferences, briefings and the like. A probot is a proxymoron who conveys programmed disinformation in computerized language and bureaucratese jargon. A probot is one who disseminates lies, distortions and convenient mass truths composed by a superior overruling elite. (See: Proxymoron)

proxymoron – one moron who speaks or acts on behalf of another pluperfect moron or a whole gang of morons. (See: Politician, Bureaucracium, Congressman, Moron-Majority, Delegate, Prozac, Oxymoron & TV)

From [HERE] and [HERE] Former California first lady and journalist Maria Shriver revealed that only “pre-determined questions” were allowed to be asked of Vice President Kamala Harris at a Michigan town hall event on Monday. 

“Are we going to be able to ask a question?” a woman attending the Oakland County event asked Shriver ahead of Harris taking the stage with former Congresswoman Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), according to the Daily Mail.  

Shriver shut her down. 

“You’re not, unfortunately, we have some pre-determined questions,” the former “Dateline” correspondent replied. 

“Hopefully I’ll be able to ask some of the questions that might be in your head,” Shriver added.

Kamala Harris participated in a "town hall" meeting this week at which those in attendance were allowed to ask Kamala questions in a format that made it seem like the questions were off the cuff when in truth they were all "pre-determined."

Harris, 59, took only three questions from the audience during the hour-long event,

Additionally Vice President Kamala Harris plagiarized material in addition to her book Smart on Crime, an analysis by Washington Free Beacon’s Aaron Sibarium found Tuesday.

The additional allegations of plagiarism diminish the credibility of the Harris campaign’s denial of plagiarism.[MORE]

The Beacon’s Sibarium reported Harris also plagiarized pages of congressional testimony from a Republican colleague and a fictionalized story about human trafficking.

Sibarium reported on Harris’s material from congressional testimony:

Virtually her entire testimony about the bill was taken from that of another district attorney, Paul Logli of Winnebago County, Illinois, who had testified in support of the legislation two months earlier before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Both statements cite the same surveys, use the same language, and make the same points in the same order, with a paragraph added here or there. They even contain the same typos, such as missing punctuation or mistaken plurals. One error — a “who” that should have been a “whom” — was corrected in Harris’s transposition.

Harris, who also testified about two other bills that day, devoted approximately 1,500 words to the John R. Justice Act. Nearly 1,200 of them—or 80 percent—were copied verbatim from the statement Logli submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee on February 27, 2007, two months before Harris delivered her testimony.

Sibarium reported on Harris’s material apparently lifted from a fictionalized story about a victim of sex trafficking:

The story came from Polaris Project, a nonprofit that runs the National Human Trafficking Hotline. By June 2012, the project had posted a series of vignettes on its website that were “representative of the types of calls” the hotline receives and “meant for informational purposes only,” according to an archived webpage. To preserve confidentiality, the project said, key details like “names, locations, and other identifying information” had been changed.

Last week, New York Times’ plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey admitted Harris’s “plagiarism scandal” is far “more serious” than previously stated. [MORE]

Also, rather than attending the Al Smith dinner and doing a comedic monologue, Harris submitted a scripted video where she was accompanied by an SNL actress in short skit that had a laugh track. [MORE]

Pfizer, Moderna mRNA COVID Injections Linked to Higher Risk of Acute Heart Disease among People Aged 10 to 59

From [HERE] People who received one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine had a higher risk of acute heart diseasecompared with those who received one dose of a non-mRNA COVID-19 shot, according to a new peer-reviewed study.

A team of South Korean researchers, who published their report on Oct. 24 in Epidemiology and Infection, said the heightened risk was most pronounced among people ages 10 to 59 compared with those age 60 and older.

The study authors analyzed the health data of 3,350,855 people who received one dose of a COVID-19vaccine from February 2021 to March 2022. The authors obtained the data from South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service (NHIS).

South Korea administered five types of COVID-19 vaccines: the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA shots, and the AstraZeneca, Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) and Novavax non-mRNA shots.

The study authors wanted to see if receiving a first dose of a particular type of COVID-19 vaccine was associated with developing acute heart disease within 21 days post-vaccination.

They also sought to determine if developing a COVID-19 infection within 21 days after the first vaccine dose was linked to a higher risk of acute heart disease.

To find out, they analyzed cardiac adverse events “including acute cardiac injury, acute myocarditis, acute pericarditiscardiac arrest, and cardiac arrhythmia, in relation to vaccine type and COVID-19 within 21 days after the first vaccination date,” according to their report.

“The results revealed higher heart disease risk in individuals receiving mRNA vaccines than other types,” they wrote. “Individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 also exhibited significantly higher heart disease risk than those uninfected.”

The study authors didn’t find a statistically significant interaction between individuals’ COVID-19 infection status and the type of COVID-19 vaccine they received — meaning the higher risk wasn’t contingent on the person having both a COVID-19 infection and an mRNA vaccination.

However, they did find that younger people who received mRNA vaccines had a higher heart disease risk compared to those 60 and up.

Dr. Peter McCullough, who posted the South Korean study on his Substack, said public health agencies never studied the comparative safety of the different COVID-19 vaccine types.

There should be “investigations into why the agencies preferentially promoted mRNA vaccines despite their higher risk of cardiovascular events,” McCullough added.

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense , told The Defenderthat “overall” the study was “compelling.” He said:

“Elevated risk of acute heart disease for mRNA products over others is biologically plausible, even beyond the well-established myocarditis and pericarditis.

“This study highlights the potential for a population-based approach to reveal such harms.” [MORE]

Study Finds 24% Increase in Homelessness in New Jersey. Although Black People Make up only 12% of the State's Population, they Account for 49% of All Homeless in State Controlled by Elite Liberals

From [HERE] Newark ranks first in the state with by far the largest number of homeless people at 2,089, according to nonprofit Monarch Housing Associates, which annually studies the homeless for the state Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency.

Jersey City came in No. 2 with 534 homeless. Camden was No. 3 with 485. 

Of the Newark total, 180, or 9%, of the homeless were found to be unsheltered, according to the count done on January 23, Monarch Housing Associates reported in its recently released annual report.

Essex County overall had 2451 total homeless persons in the report and 16% were unsheltered. 

The number of homeless in New Jersey has steadily grown since 2022 and the 12,680 total was up nearly 24% from 2023. The total unsheltered population of 1,389 was up nearly 8% from 2023.

Unsheltered homeless is defined as any individual or family with a primary nighttime residence that is in space not designed for sleeping accommodations for humans, such as a car, a park or an abandoned building, the Monarch Housing report notes.

People who stayed in emergency shelters, transitional housing and safe havens made up the sheltered homeless population.

The Monarch Housing Associates report on New Jersey is available here.

Homelessness skews toward the Black, non-Hispanic, population in New Jersey. Although African Americans make up only 12% of the state’s population, they account for 49% of the homeless population, according to the report.

The top three causes of homelessness were that the person or family was asked to leave a shared residence, eviction or at risk of eviction, and loss or reduction of job income, the report notes.

Of the homeless population reporting some type of disability, mental health issues ranked first, substance abuse disorders were second and chronic health conditions were third.

While most reported they were homeless for a year or less, about 19% were homeless for one to three years and 10% for more than three years, according to the report.

10 New Jersey municipalities with the largest homeless populations

Rank | Municipality | County | Total homeless | Unsheltered | % unsheltered

  1. Newark (Essex), 2,089, 180, 9%

  2. Jersey City (Hudson), 534, 122, 23%

  3. Camden (Camden), 485, 124, 26%

  4. Trenton (Mercer), 414, 130, 31%

  5. Paterson City (Passaic), 411, 76, 18%

  6. Elizabeth (Union), 308, 11, 4%

  7. Atlantic City (Atlantic), 281, 143, 51%

  8. Morristown (Morris), 247, 41, 17%

  9. New Brunswick (Middlesex), 182, 70, 38%

  10. Kearny (Hudson), 176, 2, 1%

Charles Barkley Drops the Dems. Says, ‘No Matter What Democrats Say, the Conditions in Black Neighborhoods Stay the Same.’

From [HERE] Charles Barkley is one of the most outspoken figures in sports media - and that includes things outside of the sports world.

The NBA Hall of Famer, who starred collegiately at Auburn, went on to star in the NBA for the Philadelphia 76ers and Phoenix Suns. He's since gotten into sports broadcasting, leading Turner Sports' coverage of the NBA. But Barkley has been outspoken on political topics, too. He's criticized both Donald Trump supporters and Democrats. 

“They come into our neighborhoods and say ‘we’re going to make stuff better. We’re going to do this, do this, do this,’” Barkley said of the Democratic Party. “And then finally, us Black people are like ‘yo man, other than my ability to dunk a basketball, all my neighborhoods is still the same. Our schools are still the same.’ And that’s why Black people are being disappointed in the Democratic Party.”

On Donald Trump supporters, he ripped them for wearing shirts with his mugshot.

"Obviously, I’m not going to go around punching random strangers in the face – first and foremost," Barkley said, via OutKick. "Secondly, people can vote for who they want to. People can vote for who they want to."

"Now, I do want to say this. I want to make it perfectly clear…If you’re a black person and you wearing a Donald Trump mugshot, you are a freaking idiot," he continued. "And I’m only saying ‘freakin’ idiot because they won’t let me say what I really wanna say. But you can figure it out, it starts with an ’f.'"[MORE]

Arizona Ballot Measure Would Allow Unlimited Abortion Throughout Pregnancy, Into the 9th Month (Aborticide)

From [HERE] A proposed amendment in Arizona would enshrine the right to abortion throughout pregnancy into the state constitution and undo the current 15-week restriction.

The abortion measure will appear on the Arizona ballot as “Proposition 139,” and is being put forward by Arizona for Abortion Access — a coalition of groups including ACLU of Arizona, Affirm Sexual and Reproductive Health, Arizona List, Healthcare Rising Arizona, NARAL Arizona, and Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona.

The measure would amend the Arizona constitution to declare that “every individual has a fundamental right to abortion” and bars the state from doing anything that:

Denies, restricts, or interferes with that right before fetal viability unless justified by a compelling state interest that is achieved by the least restrictive means.

Denies, restricts, or interferes with an abortion after fetal viability that, in the good faith judgment of a treating health care professional, is necessary to protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.

Penalizes any individual or entity for aiding or assisting a pregnant individual in exercising that individual’s right to abortion as provided in this section.

Abortion is currently restricted in Arizona after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which is when an unborn baby is believed to be capable of feeling pain. The law contains exceptions for life of the mother and serious medical emergencies. 

The Arizona Supreme Court allowed a near-total abortion ban from 1864 to go into effect over the 15-week restriction in April. However, Democrat Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs quickly signed a bill repealing the law on May 2.

Ballot measures are particularly effective as an offensive weapon because they are basically irreversible. They change a state constitution, take precedence over laws passed by state legislatures, and can only be overturned by another ballot measure or lengthy legal battles. The measures are typically propped up by left-wing organizations and affiliates with deep pockets — such as Planned Parenthood and the ACLU, out-of-state dark money groups, and billionaires with eugenicist leanings — often outspending pro-life organizations by double or triple.

Every single pro-abortion-related ballot measure since the fall of Roe has been successful. During the 2022 special elections, Kansans rejected a ballot measure that would have established that the state Constitution does not include a right to abortion. During the 2022 midterms, voters in CaliforniaMichigan, and Vermont codified abortion into their Constitutions. At the same time, voters in Montana rejected a ballot measure that would have given rights to babies born alive in botched abortions. Voters in Kentucky also rejected an amendment similar to the one in Kansas. Last November, Ohioans also voted to codify the supposed right to abortion in their state Constitution via Issue 1.

White Lawlessness as "Justice:" DA and Judge Hook Up White Cop who Murdered Ronald Greene w/Misdemeanor Plea, No Jail Time. Gang of LA Cops Brutally Beat, Tortured Shackled Black Man, Dragged Facedown

RONALD GREENE WAS A BLACK MAN WHO WAS TORTURED AND MURDERED BY WHITE TROOPERS IN LA. ON MAY 10, 2019, GREENE, WHO WAS UNARMED, DIED AFTER BEING ARRESTED BY LOUISIANA STATE POLICE FOLLOWING A HIGH-SPEED CHASE OUTSIDE MONROE, LOUISIANA. DURING THE ARREST, HE WAS STUNNED, PUNCHED, AND PLACED IN A CHOKEHOLD. HE WAS ALSO DRAGGED FACE DOWN WHILE HANDCUFFED AND SHACKLED, AND HE WAS LEFT FACE DOWN FOR AT LEAST NINE MINUTES. AT LEAST SIX WHITE TROOPERS WERE INVOLVED IN THE ARREST. WHEN GREENE'S CORPSE WAS BROUGHT TO THE HOSPITAL, LIAR COPS TOLD DOCTORS THAT HIS CAR HAD RUN INTO A TREE,

NO JAIL TIME and a $1000 FINE FOR MURDER. From [HERE] and [HERE] A white Louisiana state trooper plead no contest Monday to significantly reduced charges that spare him jail time in the deadly 2019 arrest of Black motorist Ronald Greene, the first conviction of any kind in a prolonged police brutality case that once prompted national outrage. 

Kory York had faced the most serious charges of five officers indicted in the case two years ago after body-camera video captured him dragging Greene by his ankle shackles and forcing him to lie cuffed and facedown before he stopped breathing. 

But instead of the original felony charges of negligent homicide and malfeasance, York pleaded no contest to misdemeanor battery in exchange for a year of probation and an agreement to testify against the lone officer still facing trial. 

Specifically, the White trooper entered a plea of no contest to eight counts of simple battery Monday in the Union Parish Courthouse. Judge Thomas Rogers accepted the plea. Rogers is white.

York received time served plus one year of supervised probation, $1,000 fine, 160 hours community service plus court costs.

District Attorney John Belton, who is Black, told the judge that family members had originally agreed to the plea agreement but then reversed course after the agreement had been formalized between the two parties. Belton hinted the process may not be over for York, adding, “the federal government has better laws to address this.”

Belton was the first Black district attorney elected in the 3rd Judicial District.

The plea happened despite vehement objections from Greene's family, which said they had been misled about the terms of the deal and robbed of the chance to see the felony charges play out at trial. 

“My family is a victim and we should have more of a say,” said Greene's mother, Mona Hardin, who refused to sign off on the last-minute deal that prosecutors pushed amid fears York would be acquitted in a conservative corner of the state. 

“This shouldn’t end today,” she told the packed courtroom. "It's wrong. It's unfair.” 

The family and supporters of Greene, wearing green T-shirts and filling at least two thirds of the courtroom were not happy with the plea agreement and held back no emotion.

The negligent homicide charge against York was dropped because prosecutors claimed they could not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If a group of Black men beat a white cop to death while he begged for his life, would they have the same limp wristed approach and lack of zeal? Many prosecutors are always so righteously lathered up when they send Black defendants to jail.

According to the civil complaint filed on behalf of Mr. Greene:

On or about 12 a.m. on May 10, 2019, Greene was driving a silver Toyota CH-R on U.S. 80 in Monroe, Louisiana. Trooper Demoss contends that he attempted to initiate a traffic stop of Greene’s car. Trooper Demoss does not define any violation of the motor vehicle code that would justify a stop. Instead, he contends that he observed a “traffic violation”. Greene did not stop his car and a vehicle pursuit ensued.

Greene traveled along US 80 to LA 143 and into Union Parish where his car swerved, spun, and crashed into a wooded area.

The front of Greene’s car did not make impact with a tree and his airbag did not deploy. The highest level of impact sustained by the car occurred in the rear driver side and said impact was moderate.

Greene was able to exit the vehicle without assistance. Green was not injured and could walk, speak and otherwise function in a healthy manner after the crash.

Almost immediately thereafter, Trooper Demoss and Master Trooper Hollingsworth arrived on the scene. Shortly thereafter, Captain Peters, Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, Master Trooper York, and Deputy Sherriff Harpin arrived at the scene.

Greene exited his car and began to apologize to the officers, telling them he knew he should have stopped the vehicle earlier. Officers pinned Greene down on the ground while he screamed ‘Oh my God.’”

Greene was moaning, begging the officers to stop, and repeatedly saying “I’m sorry.” Despite Greene’s contrition and surrender, Trooper Demoss, Master Trooper Hollingsworth, Master Trooper York, Captain Peters, Lieutenant Clary, Sergeant McElroy, and Deputy Sherriff Harpin individually and in concert used lethal force against Greene.

Trooper Demoss beat, smothered, and choked Greene despite the fact that he had surrendered, was not resisting, was in custody, and posed no threat. Master Trooper Hollingsworth beat, smothered, and choked Greene despite the fact that he had surrendered, was not resisting, was in custody, and posed no threat.

Master Trooper York beat, smothered, and choked Greene despite the fact that he had surrendered, was not resisting, was in custody, and posed no threat.

Lieutenant Clary beat, smothered, and choked Greene despite the fact that he had surrendered, was not resisting, was in custody, and posed no threat. Sergeant McElroy beat, smothered and choked Greene despite the fact that he had surrendered, was not resisting, was in custody, and posed no threat. Captain Peters beat, smothered, and choked Greene despite the fact that he had surrendered, was not resisting, was in custody, and posed no threat. Deputy Sherriff Harpin beat, smothered, and choked Greene despite the fact that he had surrendered, was not resisting, was in custody, and posed no threat.

Despite Greene’s contrition and surrender Defendant officers used an electronic control weapon against Greene at least three times thus attacking his heart with massive amounts of electricity. It is currently unknown which officer or officers used electronic control weapon(s) because the Louisiana State Police refused to produce or release bodycam footage, dashboard cam footage, discharge logs, use of force reports or any number of investigative materials that would identify who used lethal force.

Trooper Demoss watched other officers beat, smother, choke, and use an electronic control weapon on Greene despite the fact that he had surrendered, was not resisting, was in custody, and posed no threat.

The force used against Greene was unjustified, unreasonable, excessive, and in violation of Greene’s Fourth Amendment rights.

The force used against Greene left him beaten, bloodied, and in cardiac arrest. An officer called for an ambulance at 12:29 a.m.

When the Emergency Medical Technicians arrived at 12:51 a.m. they found Greene unresponsive. He was propped up against an officer’s leg, covered in blood with multiple “TASER” Barbs penetrating his body.

Emergency Medical Technicians determined that Greene was in cardiac and respiratory arrest.

Greene was placed on a gurney and transported to Glenwood Medical Center. He remained unresponsive when he arrived at 1:25 a.m. Greene was pronounced dead at 1:27 a.m.

An initial report from Glenwood Medical Center listed the principle cause of Greene’s death as cardiac arrest. He was also diagnosed with an “unspecified injury of head.”

Master Trooper Hollingsworth confirmed the vicious and unconstitutional nature of the Officers’ conduct by confessing that he choked and “beat the ever-loving fuck” out of Greene until he was spitting blood and went limp.

Master Trooper Hollingsworth confirmed that this vicious and unconstitutional beating was inflicted by multiple officers and in the presence of multiple officers.

All Defendants immediately began efforts to obfuscate the true nature of the conduct that caused Greene’s death. The following are examples of the Officers’ deceptions:

Greene’s family was told that he had been killed in an auto accident.

Greene’s mother was told that he had been killed immediately after hitting a tree.

The call for Emergency Medical Services omitted any mention that force had been used. The sole police report produced to date does not indicate that force was used.

Inconsistent versions of the Officers’ involvement with Greene were provided to medical treatment providers at Glenwood Hospital.

The sole police report produced to date asserted that Greene was intoxicated prior to any toxicology examinations being conducted.

Greene’s body was sent out of the State of Louisiana to conduct an autopsy, denying the right of the family to have a representative observe same.

Doctor Omokhuale, an emergency room physician at Glenwood confirms the Officers’ deception and stated as follows: “obtaining more history from different law enforcement personal, the account of what happened was disjointed and does not add up. Different versions are present and family did not come to the emergency room. Family states they were told by law enforcement that patient died on impact with tree immediately after motor vehicle accident, but law enforcement state to me that patient out of the car and was running and involved in a fight and struggle where them where he was tased 3 times.” [MORE]

[Liberals Trade Freedom for Convenience] Omnipresent License Plate Readers in Norfolk VA Enable Unconstitutional ‘Dragnet Surveillance' that Enables Cops to Watch Everywhere You Go, Lawsuit Says

From [HERE] A new federal lawsuit filed in Virginia makes taking public transit seem even more enticing. Institute for Justice, a civil liberties organization, is suing the city of Norfolk, Virginia over its use of Flock cameras, automated license plate readers that the organization says are violating citizen’s Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. 404 Media first reported on the case.

There are currently 172 Flock cameras operational in Norfolk, which use AI to passively check the cars in their vicinity. Images are stored in a database for 30 days before being destroyed but can be downloaded within that timeframe and preserved indefinitely. 

“The City of Norfolk, Virginia, has installed a network of cameras that make it functionally impossible for people to drive anywhere without having their movements tracked, photographed, and stored in an AI-assisted database that enables the warrantless surveillance of their every move. This civil rights lawsuit seeks to end this dragnet surveillance program,” reads the lawsuit

Flock cameras have been deployed in more than 5,000 communities around the United States, and have already been used in at least one criminal case wherein prosecutors used evidence from a Flock camera to try a defendant for robbery. 

Some may argue that citizens have no right to privacy when out in the public square. But the Institute for Justice in its lawsuit points to another case in Virginia wherein the judge ordered evidence from a Flock camera be suppressed because of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. “It would not be difficult for mistakes to be made tying law-abiding citizens to crime due to the nature of the Flock system and in the event a law enforcement officer would seek to create a suspect where one did not otherwise exist, it would be a simple task,” said Judge Jamilah LeCruise.

In its lawsuit, the Institute for Justice is representing two Virginia residents as plaintiffs. One of them, Lee Schmidt, expresses concern that the police in Norfolk can use Flock cameras to easily infer his daily routine. “If the Flock Cameras record Lee going straight through the intersection outside his neighborhood, for example, the NPD can infer that he is going to his daughter’s school. If the cameras capture him turning right, the NPD can infer that he is going to the shooting range. If the cameras capture him turning left, the NPD can infer that he is going to the grocery store. The Flock Cameras capture the start of nearly every trip Lee makes in his car, so he effectively cannot leave his neighborhood without the NPD knowing about it.”

Police and criminal investigators have a constant desire for more technology to help them solve crimes, and companies like Flock benefit from the fact that law enforcement is never going to say no to more tools that make their jobs easier. But we have seen countless examples of things going awry with new surveillance technology. Already, the proliferation of facial recognition in policing has resulted in innocent individuals—particularly people of color—being wrongly detained after an AI system erroneously linked them to surveillance footage at the scene of a crime. Judge LeCruise’s concern about law enforcement mistakenly tying law-abiding citizens to a crime is not just a theoretical idea. 

There’s a constant tug-of-war between the public and law enforcement over how much access they should have to our lives. Apple famously fought hard against the Department of Justice and FBI over their demands for a backdoor into the iPhone, and it’s not hard to understand why considering how authoritarian countries have abused holes in iOS to target dissidents and others. 

Investigators were able to solve crimes before the existence of AI and smartphones—their entire job is investigating things, and they should be able to do it without deep access into our personal lives. They can find potential witnesses, request CCTV footage from businesses, swab for fingerprints, or one of the many other things investigators did in the past to solve crimes. Any attempt to increase surveillance capabilities should be viewed with skepticism at the very least because of the power imbalance and real ability to harm innocent people’s lives. Sure, maybe the Flock cameras can help locate stolen rental vehicles faster. But is that worth the trade-offs?

NYC Dumbocrats Love FreeDumb: To Destroy People’s Right to Carry a Gun for Self Defense on the Dangerous Subway, NYPD is Subjecting Riders to Unconstitutional Searches w/Malfunctioning Gun Scanners

The Supreme Court made it clear that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to POSSESS and CARRY arms for self-defense in public. “The public” includes unsafe, crowded places like the NYC SUBWAY. HOWEVER, AN EXCEPTION IS THE “SENSITIVE PLACES DOCTRINE,” which prohibits carrying A gun in places deemed HISTORICALLY SENSITIVE and/or particular place’s sensitive government interests or vulnerabilities.

‘factors which make places “sensitive” might be a place where most persons therein are minors (K-12 schools), places that concentrate adversarial conflict and can generate passionately angry emotions (courthouses, legislatures, polling places), or buildings containing people at acute personal risk of being targets of assassination (many government buildings). 

HOWEVER, a place is not a sensitive place simply because it is crowded. In fact, it is common sense that in a busy, crowded place a law abiding citizen is more likely to be confronted by criminals. Nevertheless, A RECENT NY law bans handguns in places of a “sensitive nature,” which overbroadly includes all public transit AMONG OTHER THINGS [MORE]. An estimated 54% of households in NYC do not own a car, and rely on public transportation everyday. [MORE] All such persons, millions of people, cannot lawfully defend themselves with a gun, a core purpose of the 2nd Amendment. As such, said right is rendered 2nd class status under NY’s new law. ADDITIONALLY there is apparently no longstanding historical record of prohibiting peaceable gun carry on public transportation. [MORE]

TOTALITARIANISM IS A REBELLION AGAINST FREEDOM. From [HERE] Back in March, NYC Mayor Adams announced that gun detectors from Evolv Technology would be tested in subway stations as an extra security measure for commuters. The pilot program started at the Fulton Street Station on July 27 and moved around over a 30-day trial period. 

This week, the NYPD announced the results of that test run, telling City & State Thursday that the technology, which conducted 2,749 scans at 20 different subway stations, recovered 12 knives, but no guns. Police also reported 118 “false positives,” according to the news site.

In response to the numbers, Legal Aid Society released a statement saying those false alarms compromised the safety of riders. “This is objectively a failure, no matter how hard City Hall tries to spin this data,” the organization said. “We hope that this ill-conceived, fraught, and unwanted idea is finally shelved for good.” 

Other civil advocacy groups such as the New York Civil Liberties Union have spoken out strongly against the program. They believe scanning New Yorkers without reasonable suspicion violates the Fourth Amendment, which forbids unreasonable searches and seizures. 

“Subjecting New Yorkers to suspicionless searches by the police every time they need to ride the subway is an unconstitutional violation of our Fourth Amendment rights and a waste of money,” said Daniel Lambright, senior staff attorney at the NYCLU. These advocacy groups also feel the technology is unnecessary, especially because Adams himself has confirmed there’s been a major decrease in subway crime. 

The mayor has previously said he was considering expanding the use of the gun detectors. At a press conference in August, he said future use of the technology would be based on the results of the pilot run, but called the program “very impressive.”

“I know the commissioner,” he said at the time, referring to Deputy Commissioner of Operations Kaz Daughtry, “is going to release the actual data and then make the determination, do we go to next steps?”

According to Evolv Technology’s website, its weapon detectors are “AI-driven” and use “safe, ultra-low frequency, electromagnetic fields, and advanced sensors to detect concealed weapons.” Through image alarms, it can capture still and motion pictures of potential threats, and claims to have scanned over 1 billion people, and to have detected 400,000 weapons reported by customers in 2023.

Evolv says one of its customers, Windsor Regional Hospital, which has reported over 1,100 items intercepted since the installation of the system, including hundreds of knives. Evolv has over 750 other customers, with gun detectors installed in schools, healthcare facilities, and the facilities for over 40 major sports teams. 

Last year, the Utica City School District (UCSD) in upstate New York pulled back on its purchases with Evolv after multiple instances of failed weapon detection, and lawsuits emerged after an Evolv detector failed to prevent a student from entering school with a knife and stabbing another student.

The company disclosed in February that it was being investigated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The city’s own Department of Investigation is also looking into how Mayor Adams chose Evolv for the pilot launch, according to the Daily News, which also reported that the city was getting use of the scanners for its test run free of charge. 

This summer, City Limits’ CLARIFY youth journalists spoke to transit riders and advocates to get their thoughts on the use of weapon scanners in the system.

Christopher Drummond, a 21-year-old college student who was interning in the city this summer, commuting from Connecticut to Grand Central Station every day, told City Limits at the time that while he believes advanced technologies such as AI in security systems are not necessarily bad, they still create a sense of unease for commuters, himself included. 

“Seems a little eerie,” said Drummond. “I don’t think there’s necessarily anything wrong or harmful with having it, except for the fact that, like, you know, it’s like a big brother, it’s kind of weird.” 

The Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P) has also criticized the plan, calling the detectors “knockoff TSA [Transportation Security Administration] checkpoints.” 

“Once again, Mayor Adams is peddling pseudoscience,” said Albert Fox Cahn, the executive director of S.T.O.P, who called the pilot “such a bad idea.”

“Evolv is facing scrutiny and litigation from every angle,” he added. “People love the idea of a magical machine, but they’ll be furious at the reality of long lines and endless errors.” 

Riders Alliance, an organization dedicated to fighting for better New York City subways, also shared criticisms, saying gun detectors in the transit system would be inefficient. 

“It’s logistically impossible to keep weapons off the subway using airport-style detection systems,” said Danny Pearlstein, the group’s policy and communications director.

“The subway has 472 stations and thousands of entrances. Riders show up to catch the train without a moment to spare. It’s not a venue where people arrive hours early and get food and drinks before enjoying entertainment nor is it a tightly controlled environment like an airport,”  Pearlstein said. “The best way to keep weapons out is to send a consistent and clear message that no one needs to arm themselves to safely board the train.”

Sharif Hall, an organizer with the New York City Community Action Project, views the detectors as Adams’ way of maintaining a pro-police agenda instead of dealing with the real problems that impact the subway system. 

“This unreliability makes them not only a wasteful display of security theater, but an active threat to the safety of New Yorkers. Reliance on these gun detectors can only lead to disastrous situations where police punish innocent people for a machine’s mistake,” Hall said.

“They don’t prevent weapons from being carried into the subway system, they misidentify harmless objects as weapons, and they represent a massive invasion of privacy of the millions of New Yorkers who need to ride the subway to get to work, school, or to go about their lives.”

False Flaggots Feign Outrage Over Wash Post’s Fake Non-Endorsement of Kamala to Push the Illusion of a Divergent, Free Press; Instead of the Single Source Propaganda Owned by Elites that It Really is

Breitbart reports that Former Biden Blight House Adviser and black quisling Susan Rice melted down on X after the Washington Post refused to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris, marking a highly embarrassing moment for her campaign.

Rice, who critics said actually was a de facto president under Biden, blasted the leftist outlet in a series of tweets Friday afternoon, first saying she is “disgusted.”

“As a DC native and lifelong subscriber to the Post, I’m disgusted. You have lost us,” she wrote in her first post.

Other representatives and spokespersons of elites had similar reactions through the weekend. [MORE]

There was no “melt down” - this is all false flaggot theater; there is no mystery as to who the WashPost endorses. After spending vast resources and substantial time invested in bashing Trump, calling him a different derogatory term every month for the past 6-8 years in thousands of “news” articles and after cheerleading for their puppet/golden retriever Kamala since her [s]election, it is obvious who the Washington Post endorses. In the face of widespread criticism of massa media’s one sided coverage of the election, a goal here is a sarcastic attempt at maintaining the necessary illusion of an independent, divergent free press engaged in objective “journalism” providing reliable, sourced information and fact based opinion. In reality, massa’ media is the Dependent Media - a tool of elite persons that espouses the views of the vested interests. It conceals reality and seeks to project a curated and manufactured reality from the point of view and in light of the elite’s ideology and does so to advance their control and vast power over people. Massa’ media is not simply the fourth estate of the government, which is also owned and controlled by powerful elites, it is much more - possibly the most powerful organization known to humans. Malcolm X stated, “The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” Similarly, the neo-feudal review stated, ‘the power of the mainstream media isn’t simply immense - it may be almost absolute and sets the parameters of what constitutes reality for most people.” The great rebel Dr. Amos Wilson further explained,

The most effective means of disseminating and reproducing ideas in society, and in the Afrikan American community in particular, is to have that community perceive their dissemination and reproduc­tion as the work of disinterested, unbiased, non-manipulative, liberal yet authoritative, White American individuals, groups, or institutions, or as flowing from sources independent of the marked influence of the powerful. Thus, White America strongly pushes and projects the powerful mythology of independent, liberal American media, universi­ties, and other information processing establishments. That is, America loudly congratulates itself for what it calls its "free press" and mass media which permit the free exchange of ideas. Most Black Americans utilize White media and these factors as their primary, if not sole, source of information. Most are not mindful of the fact that the American press and mass media are privately owned, profit-making, White elite-controlled corporations. The press is one among other institutions, "and one of the most important in maintaining the hegemony of the corporate class and the capitalist system itself," advances Parenti. [MORE]

If the press cannot mold our every opinion, it can frame the perpetual reality around which our opinions take shape. Here may lie the most important effect of the news media: they set the issue agenda for the rest of us, choosing what to emphasize and what to ignore or suppress, in effect, organizing our political world for us. The media may not always be able to tell us what to think, but they are strikingly success­ful in telling us what to think about .... [MORE]

Along with the COVID plandemic, election 2024 coverage has functioned as a highly observable episode of what Dr. Blynd calls “single source propaganda.” (also see book by Michelle Stiles). Single source propaganda refers to the uniformity of the entire mainstream media covering the same information in the same manner without any dissent or contradiction - a synchronization that seeks mass conformity, uncritical examination of information, obedience and artificial dogmatic acceptance. Like magicians, massa’ media declared Kamala “brand new” and poof she became free from any accounting for any Blight House failures or her abject failures to deliver anything of tangible value to Black communities. Most importantly, they re-invented her, pretending she was an entirely different person the day before, because the media said so. Kamala is a wooden dummy of the elites and she only speaks when they speak through her, with their hand up her ass.

According to FUNTIONARY

The Media – the Spectacle-Cabal who love freedom of the press, but abhor freedom of speech. The Media is the Fourth Estate of Government (created, owned, administered and controlled by Pathocrats). It is one of the most essential arms of “government.” They couldn’t give you their Matrix Reality without it—likewise they couldn’t keep you imprisoned in it without it. The News Anchor holds down the Ship of State at the Port of Lies. How is it that shareholders of Media conglomerates also sit as anchors and bring you their master’s views as if it could ever be objective or news? “The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” ~ Malcolm X. (See: Television, Perception, MEDIA, Senses, CON, Normal, Pathocracy, NEWS, Corporate Media, Control, COG & Pixelated People)

mass media – “Massa’ Media. Massa’s media plus (+) Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses. 2) The “Mess” Media. 3) wholesale retale— retelling the whole tale (propaganda) exactly as you’re told, consistently and relentlessly. How can you possibly relate when you are framed by the very debate wherein you are an unwilling spectator? Let’s be perfectly clear on this. There’s no counteroption or outlet to vent when you’re under the controlled thoughtform of mass-think manufactured consent. “Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.” ~A.J. Liebling. (See: Media, T.V., Mass, Alienation, Spectacle Society, NEWS, ABCTV, Propaganda, Legislation & The New God Economy)

Although Black and White People Don’t Use Drugs at Different Rates, Drug Overdose Deaths Decreased Among Whites but Increased for Blacks, according to Georgetown University Research

From [HERE] Overdose deaths across the country decreased by more than 12 percent between May 2023 and May 2024, according to new federal data, a major development in the nation’s efforts to combat the effects of fentanyl. The decrease continued a trend observed in recent months, and was the largest on record, the White House said last week.

But a new analysis from Georgetown University researchers tells a more complicated story about a health crisis still claiming about 100,000 lives every year. In 22 states that track drug overdoses by race and ethnicity, the number of fatal overdoses among Black Americans typically increased between 2022 and 2023, while deadly overdoses among white Americans often decreased, the researchers found.

The findings reveal a continuation of what federal and state health officials have described as a two-track epidemic, with white Americans experiencing better outcomes and Black Americans struggling to keep up. As overdose deaths rose to record levels in recent years, rates among Black and Native Americans were higher. But the more recent data goes further in showing how sharply the experiences of drug users have diverged by race.

In Arizona, for instance, fatal drug overdoses among white people decreased by more than 2 percent, while overdoses among Black people increased by roughly a third. In Michigan, deadly drug overdoses among white people decreased by 12 percent, and increased among Black people by 6 percent. In Maine, fatal overdoses dropped by about 20 percent among white people but rose by over 40 percent among Black people.

In states where decreases were found in both groups, they were typically smaller for Black Americans. In states where increases were found in both groups, they were often greater for Black people. And in places that tracked overdoses among Native and Hispanic Americans, similar disparities arose. [MORE]

[Racist Liberals Hated Marion Barry b/c He Tried to Help Black People] “& Pizza” Ridicules Black Mayor w/New Ad [perhaps its New Slogan should be: "& We Hate Black People but We Love NGHRS"]

PROBABLY COULDN’T AFFORD SNIGGER KEVIN HART OR STEVE HARVEY TO SELL ITS MEDIOCRE MENU. From [HERE] The family of late Washington, D.C., Mayor Marion Barry, along with other members of the community, have spoken out against a new dessert sold at a pizza chain as the advertising for the berry-filled knots nods toward being named after the mayor who served over four non-consecutive terms between 1979 and 1998.

The pizza chain, &pizza, with locations in Washington, Maryland, Virginia, New York City, New Jersey and Philadelphia, did not directly state that its “Marion Berry Knots” menu item is named after the former mayor, who died on Nov. 23, 2014. But it recycled a version of the 1992 slogan he used to win a seat on the D.C. Council in an Oct. 21. Instagram reel.

His slogan was “He May Not Be Perfect, But He’s Perfect for D.C.,” and &pizza says its new menu item “may not be the perfect dessert, but they’re the perfect dessert for D.C.,” Fox5 DC reported.

&pizza describes its limited-time dessert item as “doughy dessert knots” that “are stuffed with deliciously sweet marionberries and topped with a creamy vanilla icing drizzle.”

“Our new Marion Berry Knots will blow you away,” the chain captioned a post featuring a video of its customers with the powdered sugar-topped dessert knots.

The advertisement shared online for the chain’s dessert has influenced outrage as Barry’s family and local activists have spoken out against &pizza and its new dessert.

Protesters took to the business on Wednesday demanding an apology, according to NBC Washington. People also splashed orange paint on the business and broke all the windows.

Marion’s widow, Cora Masters Barry, had one thing to say about &pizza’s dessert and advertisement tactics.

“I just think it’s racist,” she told D.C. News Now. “In this city, it is outrageously racist. You can print that. It’s racist and disrespectful.”

BML Public Relations, which handles publicity for the chain, has released information to DC News Now explaining: “For a good time, it’s the powder that’s the ultimate headline grabber. The Marion Berry Knots have enough powdered sugar that will have customers bumping elbows to order and even force the DEA to look twice.”

The ad alluded to Barry being arrested in a high-profile FBI sting operation for possession of crack cocaine in 1990 at the conclusion of a long-running investigation into rumors about his lifestyle.

ELITE LIBERAL RACISTS HATED MARION BARRY BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT CONTROL HIM AND BECAUSE HE TRIED TO HELP BLACK PEOPLE. ELITES USED THIER MEDIA AND AUTHORITIES TO TARGET BARRY. ABOVE, THE FRONT PAGE OF THE CITY PAPER FROM JULY 10, 2009, A SO-CALLED RESPECTABLE PUBLICATION OWNED BY ELITE WHITE LIBERALS.

THE GRAVAMEN OF RACISM IS MASTER-SERVANT RELATIONS NOT HATRED. Marion S. Barry Jr., a sharecropper’s son and civil rights pioneer who became a flamboyant and polarizing mayor of Washington, went to prison on drug possession charges and then recaptured City Hall in one of the most improbable comebacks in the history of American politics, died at the age of 78.

He underwent surgery for prostate cancer in 1995, had a kidney transplant in 2009 and was treated for high blood pressure, diabetes and anemia. White supremacy/racism was probably the real cause of his death. 

Elected mayor four times — in 1978, 1982, 1986 and 1994 — Mr. Barry left the mayor’s office for good early in 1999 and then worked as an investment banker. But politics was never far from his mind. In 2004 he was elected to the District of Columbia Council from a hard-pressed section in Southeast Washington, a district he represented until his death.

Before there was Trump, there was Marion. Elite racists and their media and authorities spent substantial resources and time on removing Barry from office. The mainstream media and especially local media, Washington Post, City Paper, NBC, ABC and CBS functioned as “single source propaganda” trashing Barry on a regular basis (see photo above - an actual front page City Paper). They were obsessed with Barry’s every word and action - obsessed and lathered up in their overt hatred of him. Elites apparently were stunned when the black votary elected him despite their efforts.

Racists love to discuss his cocaine possession episode, it is important to them. Marion Barry's possession of crack essentially led to a federal (elite white people) takeover/control board of D.C. [MORE]  On January 18, 1990, Barry was arrested in a sting operation by the FBI and D.C. Police for crack cocaine use and possession. Barry was charged with three felony counts of perjury, 10 counts of drug possession, and one misdemeanor count of conspiracy to possess cocaine. The criminal trial ended with a conviction for only one count of possession, which had occurred in November 1989, and an acquittal on another. That is, he was not convicted of any charges from the infamous hotel incident. But never mind the actual result, it was and still is a big, big deal to the elite white media. He was sentenced to 6 months in jail in what was essentially a revenge episode for white liberals, angry about the unfiltered Barry's efforts to relieve the suffering of Black people in this system of oppression.  

Class Action of 6,000 Residents Claims Buffalo Cops Target and Stop Blacks and Latinos. Routinely Destroying Their Freedom of Movement Over Trivial Matters Having No Impact on Safety or Harm to Others

From [HERE] and [HERE] At its core, Black Love Resists in the Rust v. City of Buffalo is a lawsuit looking to seek damages and institutional change for policing but only now, with class certification officially underway, is the case able to move forward in federal court.

The suit alleges complaints of police misconduct lodged against the Buffalo Police Department were either not addressed or completely ignored, despite the department having practices and policies in place.

For years, non-white residents of Buffalo have spoken out about discriminatory police stops, which they say have often resulted in multiple tickets, sometimes for the same infraction.

In addition, Buffalo Police Department data showed that minority drivers were about three times more likely to be stopped than white drivers, based on a News 4 Investigates analysis published in 2022.

In 2018, nine members of Black Love Resists in the Rust, a Buffalo organization that focuses on alternatives to policing to reduce harm to minorities, made these allegations in a federal civil rights lawsuit.

On Wednesday, attorneys for the organization said that since filing the lawsuit, they’ve identified about 6,000 additional minority drivers who were stopped by police at checkpoints and cited for multiple tinted window tickets.

Alleged infringement on the plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment rights for unlawful detainment and 14th Amendment rights for equal protection is what’s at issue in the case, specifically for Black and Hispanic citizens.

The attorneys are now seeking class action certification to represent all minority drivers they can identify who were impacted by “unconstitutional and discriminatory practices of the Buffalo Police Department.”

In addition, the attorneys want an injunction to force the police department to reform policies to deter discriminatory practices, which plaintiffs said have continued despite the lawsuit.

The lawsuit alleges 87% of checkpoints to monitor and deter crime were placed in neighborhoods of color. The U.S. Supreme Court previously ruled checkpoints like those in the argument to be unconstitutional. Detainments that wielded millions of dollars in tickets and fines are part of the classes being solidified in the suit.

The argument is those tickets disproportionately targeted these same communities and served as part of targeted 'dragnet' policing. [MORE]

Claudia Wilner, the director of litigation and advocacy for the National Center for Law and Economic Justice, said in federal court that these policing practices continue, which “have greatly harmed and continue to harm Black and Latino communities.”

City officials have denied the allegation that police stop motorists based on the color of their skin.

Hugh Russ, an attorney representing the city, said during most of the time period cited in the lawsuit, the city had a Black Mayor and police commissioner, along with “a number of Black police officers.”

“It is just difficult to concede that the kind of discriminatory animus the plaintiffs cite existed,” Russ said.

But Wilner and the team of attorneys came armed to federal court with data that showed massive disparities in who received multiple tinted windows tickets in a single stop.

Wilner said the rate of Black and Latino drivers cited for multiple tinted window tickets was 15 percent higher than for white drivers. At its worst, 90 percent of Black drivers cited for tinted windows received multiple tickets, sometimes for each window.

Police issued about 52,000 tinted window tickets in a 10-year period ending in 2022. Wilner said 73 percent of those tickets went to Black and Latino drivers.

The allegations center around police checkpoints, which she said were largely set up in minority neighborhoods. A motivating factor to the checkpoints and ticketing was to raise revenue for the city, she said.

The city “can’t just put its head in the sand and allow discrimination to happen,” Wilner said in court.

Russ said testimony from officers did not imply that revenue from tickets was a motivation for the checkpoints and vehicle stops.

“While there have been documents and other evidence seeming to suggest the city was trying to raise revenue through the issuance of one or more traffic tickets, all the individual officers who testified … said that was not their motive,” Russ said.

Russ said the police department launched checkpoints because residents of East Buffalo neighborhoods asked for more police presence.

“The first and motivating principle of the checkpoints was traffic safety,” Russ said.

The city has since stopped checkpoints, Russ said, and “there is no future intent to do them.”

Bianca Bassett, a member of Black Love Resists in the Rust, said during a press conference they are demanding a commitment from the city to permanently end racially biased policing and excessive ticketing.

“Communities like ours, mostly Black, poor and immigrant communities, have consistently been ignored, under resourced, and almost consistently surveilled by the Buffalo Police Department,” Bassett said.

“Even these obvious examples of racism by BPD have been brushed under the rug and ignored,” she said.

In February 2022, News 4 Investigates asked Police Commissioner Joseph Gramaglia if the department has a racial bias problem.

“I do not,” Gramaglia said. “I think our department has worked very diligently on training over the years, over many years. I also think we have one of the most diverse makeups in our department in many years. I think we have a very professional police department.”

Wilner said during a press conference on the steps of federal court that the commissioner continued to deny that the police department engaged in racial profiling.

Black Citizens Can’t Hire, Fire or Decline "Public Service" from Uncontrollable Race Soldiers: NYPD Tossing Out Hundreds Of Misconduct Cases w/o Even Looking at Them in City Controlled by Liberals

From [HERE] The New York Police Department has tossed out hundreds of civilian complaints about police misconduct this year without looking at the evidence.

The cases were fully investigated and substantiated by the city’s police oversight agency, the Civilian Complaint Review Board, and sent to the NYPD for disciplinary action. They included officers wrongfully searching vehicles and homes, as well as using excessive force against New Yorkers.

In one instance, an officer punched a man in the groin, the oversight agency found. In another, an officer unjustifiably tackled a young man, and then another officer wrongly stopped and searched him, according to the CCRB.

The incident involving the young man was one of dozens of stop-and-frisk complaints the NYPD dismissed without review this year — a significant development given that the department is still under federal monitoring that a court imposed more than a decade ago over the controversial tactic.

The practice of killing cases without review began three years ago as a way to cope with escalating caseloads that were approaching a deadline for discipline. But ProPublica found it has become more frequent under Police Commissioner Edward Caban.

The commissioner may not be in his position for long. He is under pressure to resign after his phone was seized in a federal corruption investigation. He has also faced criticism for failing to hold officers accountable for misconduct.

Since he took office last July, the NYPD has ended without review more than 500 incidents, about half the cases the oversight board referred to it, according to an analysis of board data. That rate has climbed to nearly 60% this year. Under Caban’s predecessor, Keechant Sewell, the department faced roughly the same number of cases, but about 40% were tossed without review. (Neither Caban nor Sewell responded to requests for comment.)

Worse than Rikers? Liberal Authorities at DC Jail are Using Solitary Confinement as a Default Placement for Inmates who are Vulnerable or Have Mental Health Issues in Their Dangerous, 95% Black Jail

A writer at City Paper explained I observed DOC’s frequent use of solitary confinement not just as a means to address serious infractions, but also as the default placement for people who expressed concern for their safety or who were experiencing a mental health crisis. People in solitary confinement in the DC Jail are typically held in a single cell for 23 hours a day; they are allowed one hour out of the cell for exercise and showers.

Individuals in DOC custody have been placed in isolation for nonviolent violations, such as substance use, often without the required internal hearing and attorney representation. Similar to the judicial process, if an incarcerated individual receives an institutional charge, they must have a hearing and be found guilty prior to receiving discipline. 

If an individual says they feel unsafe in general population, including for their sexual orientation or gender identity, that person is placed in “protective custody” and locked in a cell alone for 23 hours per day.

The DOC response to a mental health crisis is to send a person to a “safe cell,” where they are held until they are no longer determined to be a risk to themselves. Despite the different names, these practices all constitute solitary confinement and cause serious harm.

What I have observed to be DOC’s overreliance on isolation stands in stark contrast to its transparency around the practice. A recent report from the Council for Court Excellence highlights the difficulty the nonprofit had in getting even basic information about DOC’s use of solitary confinement. CCE requested data from fiscal years 2019 through 2021, for example, but DOC only released limited information from 2021. [MORE]

San Francisco Transit System Authorities Must Pay Nearly $8 Million to 6 Workers Fired for Refusing COVID Shots

From [HERE] The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) must pay about $7.8 million to six former employees who lost their jobs after the district denied their requests for accommodations for religious exemptions from BART’s COVID-19 mandate.

In the largest financial win yet for workers fired for failing to comply with COVID-19 vaccinemandates, a federal jury composed of entirely vaccinated jurors on Wednesday awarded the plaintiffs between approximately $1.2 million and $1.5 million each to compensate for economic losses and mental anguish.

The case is one of hundreds filed across the country since 2021, representing thousands of workers who say they lost their jobs when their employers illegally denied their requests for religious accommodation to the COVID-19 mandate.

“These verdicts are seismic — a 7.8 San Francisco legal earthquake,” Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, which represented the plaintiffs, said in a statement. “This amazing outcome represents so much hard work by our team, perseverance by these clients, and fairness from our judicial system.”

The workers’ attorney, Kevin Snider, told The Defender that because of BART’s mandate, “The workers were forced to either deny their faith or lose their jobs.” He said they chose the latter, demonstrating the sincerity of their religious convictions.

he lawsuit began as three separate cases representing 35 employees fired by BART. The three cases were later consolidated into a single lawsuit. Twenty-nine of the plaintiffs settled with BART, but the remaining six went to trial this month.

“These workers lost their jobs and have struggled for more than two years,” Snider said. “It was a devastating disruption to their lives and to their families. Being able to settle or get a jury verdict helps them to put closure on this and for those who went to trial, they felt heard and understood by a jury, which can be important.”

This was the second time the case went to trial. The first trial ended in a mistrial in July when the jury could not reach a unanimous decision, as required in federal civil trials. [MORE]

CDC Paid Coin-Operated Black Influencers w/Money from Elites [Bill Gates, Fakebook etc] to Push COVID Shots: Myth-Information about Safety Fraudulently Induced the Public into Taking Deadly Injections

From [HERE] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in partnership with the CDC Foundation, funded a toolkit to train community-based organizations on how to hire influencers to combat “vaccine myths” in communities of color.

The CDC Foundation’s donor list includes the World Health Organization, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and vaccine makers including Pfizer, Merck and Johnson & Johnson.

The toolkit, first rolled out in 2022, is part of a suite of resources created by the CDC’s Partnering for Vaccine Equity Program (P4VE), which targets ethnic and racial minority communities to increase vaccine uptake by funding “partnerships” with the CDC.

P4VE’s Vaccine Resource Hub is funded through a grant for over $80 million from the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It includes toolkits, unbranded digital materials and messaging in over 50 languages.

Community organizations can use the “Influencer Guide” to help them contact influencers who can spread the organizations’ messages in the influencers’ own voices.

The guide suggests targeting mid-level influencers — those who aren’t overly famous and who are preferably “self-made” — because they’re often seen as more relatable and trusted than large brands or celebrities on social media.

These influencers can effectively act as messengers with a wide reach to promote vaccination in racial and ethnic minority communities.

To maximize their online influence, the guide recommends community organizations first identify suitable candidates with a relevant background and who haven’t made “inappropriate” posts in the past.

Once they’ve identified the right influencers, organizations can ask influencers to partner with them to spread their message about, for example, the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for people in marginalized communities. [MORE]