Peer Reviewed Study Finds that COVID Injections Pose 112,000% Greater Risk of Brain Clots, Strokes Than Flu Shots
/From [HERE] COVID-19 vaccines pose a 112,000% greater risk of brain clots and strokes than flu vaccines and a 20,700% greater risk of those symptoms than all other vaccines combined, according to a peer-reviewed study that calls for a global moratorium on the vaccines.
The study, published last week in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science, found reports of 5,137 cases of cerebral thromboembolism after COVID-19 shots over 36 months. This compares to 52 reported cases following flu vaccination and 282 cases for all vaccines over the past 34 years.
According to the study, this represents an “alarming breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis adverse events” following COVID-19 vaccination.
The study’s authors — independent researcher Claire Rogers, obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. James A. Thorp, independent researcher Kirstin Cosgrove and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough — used data from the U.S. government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), for their analysis.
The data also indicated 9,821 reports of atrial fibrillation — an irregular heart rhythm that is “the most common identifiable cause of cerebral arterial thromboembolism” — following COVID-19 vaccination in 41 months, compared to 797 cases reported in 34 years for all other vaccines combined.
Rogers told The Defender the findings confirm anecdotal evidence of an increased incidence of stroke seen during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. [MORE]
A Newly Republished, Previously Censored Autopsy Study on COVID Shots Shows a ‘High Likelihood’ that COVID “Vaccines” Cause Death. Peer Reviewed Paper Finds 73% of Deaths Linked to COVID Injections
/
CHD states: The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to date has been republished in a peer-reviewed journal after twice being censored. The study’s lead author said it provides “robust evidence” that the vaccines can cause death, meeting the FDA’s criteria for “an immediate market withdrawal.”
From [HERE] The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to date has been republished in a peer-reviewed journal — after twice being censored, according to Nicolas Hulscher, the paper’s lead author and an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation.
Science, Public Health Policy and the Law on Nov. 17 published the study, which had been previously withdrawn from Preprints with The Lancet and Forensic Science International.
Hulscher told The Defender the study’s republication signals a “pivotal victory for transparency and accountability in science.” It also marks “a significant setback” for actors in the biopharmaceutical complex and “their Academic Publishing Cartel,” Hulscher said.
Hulscher’s co-authors include Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Peter A. McCullough and Dr. William Makis.
Hulscher told The Defender the study provides “robust evidence that COVID-19 vaccines can cause death. This means that the FDA’s [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] criteria for a Class I recall have been fulfilled, warranting an immediate market withdrawal.”
The FDA defines a Class I product recall as “a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.”
Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, told The Defender that the COVID-19 vaccine spike protein “can stay around in some people and continue to do inflammatory damage in any site where it gets to through the bloodstream.”
In ‘striking act of censorship’ publishers withdraw study, shut down debate
The study’s publication in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law is the latest twist in an ongoing saga as the authors have tried to get their research out to the public and scientific community, Hulscher wrote on Substack.
The study results were first made public on July 5, 2023, as a preprint with The Lancet on SSRN, an open-access research platform.
However, Preprints with The Lancet removed the study from the server within 24 hours, posting a statement that the study’s conclusions were “not supported by the study methodology,” The Daily Sceptic reported.
McCullough told The Epoch Times that the study was experiencing “hundreds of reviews per minute” before its removal.
73.9% of deaths reviewed by authors linked to COVID vaccines
As The Defender previously reported, the study authors did a systematic review of studies on autopsy findings following COVID-19 vaccination.
They first searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and necropsy — another word for autopsy — reports related to COVID-19 vaccination in which the death occurred after vaccination.
They screened out 562 duplicate studies among the 678 studies initially identified in their search. Other papers were removed because they lacked information about vaccination status.
Ultimately, they evaluated 44 papers containing 325 autopsies and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not the COVID-19 shot was the direct cause or contributed significantly to the death reported.
They found 240 of the deaths (73.9%) were found to be “directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.” The mean age for death was 70.4 years old.
Primary causes of death included sudden cardiac death, which happened in 35% of cases, pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction, which occurred in 12.5% and 12% of the cases respectively.
Other causes included vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, myocarditis,multisystem inflammatory syndrome and cerebral hemorrhage.
Most deaths occurred within a week of the last shot.
The authors concluded that because the deaths were highly consistent with the known mechanisms for COVID-19 vaccine injury, it was highly likely the deaths were causally linked to the vaccine.
They said the findings “amplify” existing concerns about the vaccines, including those related to vaccine-induced myocarditis and myocardial infarction and the effects of the spike protein more broadly.
They also said the studies have implications for unanticipated deaths among vaccinated people with no previous illness. “We can infer that in such cases, death may have been caused by COVID-19 vaccination,” they wrote. [MORE]
"Vaccine" Makers See Stocks Fall After RFK Jr. Announcement
/
From [HERE] Vaccine makers saw stocks fall Friday after President-elect Donald Trump announced that Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vaccine skeptic, was his choice to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Kennedy Jr. has advocated against processed foods and the use of herbicides. He has long criticized large commercial farms and animal-feeding operations. But his stance on childhood vaccines is perhaps most notable. He has said that he believes in the debunked idea that vaccines cause autism and said in a July podcast interview, “There’s no vaccine that is safe and effective.” However, he has said that he is not anti-vaccine.
On Friday morning, hours after Trump chose Kennedy Jr. as his pick for HHS secretary, Pfizer’sstock dropped 4.3% while Moderna’s fell 3.1% and Novavax saw a 2.8% dip in its stock.
Michael Nevradakis, Ph D: COVID Injections Pose 112,000% Greater Risk of Brain Clots, Strokes Than Flu Shots
/From [HERE] A peer-reviewed study published last week in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science found reports of 5,137 cases of cerebral thromboembolism after COVID-19 shots over 36 months, compared with 52 reported cases following flu vaccines and 282 cases for all vaccines over the past 34 years.
COVID-19 vaccines pose a 112,000% greater risk of brain clots and strokes than flu vaccines and a 20,700% greater risk of those symptoms than all other vaccines combined, according to a peer-reviewed study that calls for a global moratorium on the vaccines.
The study, published last week in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science, found reports of 5,137 cases of cerebral thromboembolism after COVID-19 shots over 36 months. This compares to 52 reported cases following flu vaccination and 282 cases for all vaccines over the past 34 years.
According to the study, this represents an “alarming breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis adverse events” following COVID-19 vaccination.
The study’s authors — independent researcher Claire Rogers, obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. James A. Thorp, independent researcher Kirstin Cosgrove and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough — used data from the U.S. government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), for their analysis.
The data also indicated 9,821 reports of atrial fibrillation — an irregular heart rhythm that is “the most common identifiable cause of cerebral arterial thromboembolism” — following COVID-19 vaccination in 41 months, compared to 797 cases reported in 34 years for all other vaccines combined.
Rogers told The Defender the findings confirm anecdotal evidence of an increased incidence of stroke seen during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Dr Peter McCullough: “I Have Never Seen Something So Injurious to the Human Body” as COVID Injections. "It is a Bioweapon."
/From [HERE] “I have never seen something so injurious to the human body,” Dr. Peter McCullough said speaking about the mRNA (or spike protein) in the covid injections.
“It invades the brain. It invades the heart. It causes brain and heart damage,” he said.
The list of damage the spike protein causes goes on.
“It invades the bone marrow. It stimulates antibodies to actually attack our own platelets and other cells in our body. It causes blood clotting and damage to blood vessels like we’ve never seen. Like we’ve never seen. Data from the University of Pittsburgh suggests it causes cancer,” Dr. McCullough said.
“Since when do we have a protein that actually injures the brain, injures the heart, the bone marrow, the immune system, causes blood clotting and potentially causes cancer in a single protein?” he asked.
“It’s a weapon,” he said. “According to strict military criteria, it’s a bioweapon.”
The video above is clipped from the first episode of ‘Propaganda Exposed! [Uncensored]’, the most important documentary series The Truth About Vaccines has ever created and their latest endeavour to uncover the truth and dispel the lies told by corporate media and the medical industry. The 9-part series highlights statements made by over 50 health and freedom experts.
The Truth About Cancer (“TTAV”) was founded by Charlene & Ty Bollinger. After losing several family members to cancer, they refused to accept the notion that chemotherapy, radiation and surgery were the most effective treatments available for cancer patients.
Philippines COVID Injection Depopulation Program: Fewer Births and Excess Deaths During 2020-2023 Result in 1.3 Million Fewer Filipinos
/
According to THE undeceiver Ishmael Reed:
genthanasia - the non-violent weeding out of undesirables or the slow motion extermination of populations. Benign extermination. Subtler non-violent ethnic cleansing. “Genthanasia takes the form of placing an embargo on supplies that were promised to Puerto Rico, leading to 4,000 deaths. Poisoning of water in Flint, like creating smallpox epidemics among Indian tribes. Predictably, the bureaucratic rogues who were responsible for lead poisoning have had their convictions overturned by a friendly Colonial court…Genthanasia includes slavery with a different name, like private prisons where inmates are forced to work or starve. [MORE]
From [HERE] Using 2019 as the last “typical year,” Super Sally compares the Vital Statistics data for births and deaths during 2023 for the Philippines.
“New readers may be shocked at the excess mortality in 2021, which started only in March of that year,” she writes. However, “I believe that the 2021 mortality and birth data was throttled in early 2022, and the devastation of 2021 will likely be hidden forever.”
Adding the number of fewer births and the number of excess deaths for the years 4 years 2020 to 2023, Super Sally calculates that there is an “unrealised population” of 1.285 million; people who likely should have been living and contributing to the population, but are not.
The Philippines Civil Registration System is responsible for collecting and maintaining vital statistics, including births, marriages and deaths. The data is obtained from vital events registered at the appropriate Office of the City/Municipal Civil Registrar throughout the country and subsequently submitted for encoding to the Office of the Civil Registrar General through the Provincial Statistical Offices of the Philippine Statistics Authority (“PSA”).
On a yearly basis, the PSA publishes a report on these vital statistics called the Vital Statistics Report (“VSR”). The VSR relating to the year 2023 was published on 7 November 2024.
The Philippines’ mass covid-19 vaccination programme was initiated in March 2021. While there were a few covid “vaccine” brands used in the Philippines, it is the Jannsen injection supplied by COVAXthat seems to have been the most deadly.
“This is not to say other injectables were not deadly and causative of excess deaths, just that Janssen drove those excess deaths to a new devastating high!” Super Sally writes.
Graphs and data are [HERE]
New Research Shows COVID Injections Increase the Risk of Getting COVID because They Destroy Key Protective Antibodies
/From [STEVEKIRSCH] Any competent virologist will tell you that if you want to reduce the risk of infection of a respiratory virus, increasing the level of mucosal IgA antibodies is required. And you want to increase the receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies especially because these antibodies prevent the virus from attaching to the entry point receptors (ACE2) on your cells.
So any vaccine that reduces your risk of infection has to increase the secretory IgA antibodies that target the RBD on the virus.
Well you’ll never guess what happens to these critical “first line of defense” antibodies after you get vaccinated.
So I’ll tell you now: in everyone they drop, and in most people, they drop to unmeasurable levels.
That’s right. This paper clearly and unambiguously showed that the COVID “vaccines” make you more susceptible to getting COVID, not less. It’s a disaster. And it was as clear as night vs. day 2.5 years ago when this paper came out. If anyone was paying attention that is.
Of course, the authors didn’t notice. Nothing in the abstract about this finding.
Nobody in the medical community noticed.
Nobody in the mainstream media or the medical media noticed it either.
And, AFAIK, nobody in the anti-vaccine community noticed as well.
As far as I know, I’m the first one to point this out.
This paper should have ENDED the COVID vaccine program 2.5 years ago.
It should have led to the CDC warning people that they lied to people about reducing the risk of infection. They should have warned the public that getting the COVID vaccine will increase your risk of getting COVID.
It’s all in one chart. You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to figure it out.
I’ll show you the chart and explain what it means.
The papers
Paper in Nature published 25 April 2022: Systemic and mucosal IgA responses are variably induced in response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and are associated with protection against subsequent infection
There is also a newer paper published two years later (23 April 2024): Serum and Salivary IgG and IgA Response After COVID-19 Messenger RNA Vaccination. This isn’t nearly as good as the previous paper (it doesn’t look at absolute levels, it doesn’t look at RBD antibodies which are key), but it shows very clearly that Pfizer didn’t move the relative IgA levels at all.
Dr Mike Yeadon, Former Pfizer VP: COVID Injections were intentionally Designed to Injure, Kill and Cause Infertility
/From [HERE] Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of Pfizer, is a professional research scientist with over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology. Applying his experience and knowledge to the contents of the covid injections, Dr. Yeadon can work out the intentions of the “vaccine” designers. He explained how he was able to do this and what the only conclusions could be during a presentation to the Impfopfer Resistance Conference held in Vienna, Austria, on 9 November 2024. Impfopfer (English: Vaccine Victim) is Austria’s largest association for those who have suffered or are suffering from vaccine harm.
Dr. Yeadon explained to the conference that it is formally impossible to invent, research, test, evaluate, manufacture, gain authorisation for and launch a complex new biological product in under a year, regardless of the amount of money and people involved, due to a series of linear steps in the process that cannot be completed in such a short time frame as 12 months or less. The process necessarily takes several years.
Complex biological products, such as the so-called vaccines, have numerous features that would give rise to toxicities, which professionals in the industry would know about. So, these features have been built-in by choice, Dr. Yeadon explained.
The covid “vaccines” are gene-based products, containing a string of genetic information, which is a brand new technology, and there were no products like that in routine use anywhere in the world.
The gene-based injections cause the body to make a protein based on the genetic code. The effect of the injections is that the body is forced to manufacture a foreign protein, the spike protein, which is known to be acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots, and to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction.
Additionally, the body recognises this spike protein as foreign and launches an autoimmune reaction to attack the cells that produce it, which can lead to various health issues depending on where the reaction occurs in the body. This autoimmune reaction can occur in any cell, tissue or organ in the body where the injected dose lands, and can cause conditions such as myocarditis, heart attack, stroke or neurological conditions.
That the instructions for spike protein were included in the “vaccines” is not a mistake. The person who chose the spike protein sequence knew of its toxic properties – it’s not an accident, but a deliberate choice, Dr. Yeadon said.
The spike protein is not the only egregious ingredient in the covid injections. The genetic code for the spike protein is enveloped in a lipid nanoparticle (“LNP”). LNPs are tiny particles of fat that allow the payload to disproportionately deposit in the ovaries.
Dr. Yeadon highlighted that science papers published as early as 2012 showed that LNPs lead to a disproportionate deposition of the payload into the ovaries when injected into animals and people.
“I remember the day I read that paper, I really couldn’t sleep,” Dr. Yeadon said. “The person who chose to use lipid nanoparticles to formulate the Moderna and Pfizer products knew perfectly well that what they would do is allow them to drift all through your body, through membranes as if they weren’t there, and disproportionately deposit in your ovaries.”
“Given I’ve told you the first two things – which is that will induce your body to attack every cell in the body that follows the [genetic] instructions [of the “vaccine”] and that instruction by the way is to make a poison – you should no longer be surprised that people have been injured and killed and had their fertility reduced,” he said.
The COVID virus was/is no more dangerous than the flu - It had a similar infection fatality rate. There was No Excess Mortality Anywhere Before the so-called "Vaccination" Rollout- Dr Reiner Fuellmich
/From The Summary Findings of the Corona Investigative Committee
Covid measures were never about health
I. The virus is no more dangerous than a flu virus
There are indications that the original virus, allegedly first detected in Wuhan, was artificially produced in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, by means of so-called gain of function experiments. Such experiments intend to make a virus more dangerous, in particular to cause it to jump from animals to humans. These are, in fact, experiments for the production of bioweapons. Among others, the US immunologist Dr. Fauci and the aforementioned German virologist Prof. Dr. Drosten were significantly involved in such gain of function experiments. There are a lot of things that need to be clarified, but this much is certain: The original virus has long since ceased to exist. Rather, as with every flu virus, various variants/mutations have been documented that may spread more quickly, but are all far less dangerous than the original virus—and it doesn’t make a difference if it was artificial or natural. In addition, however, there are considerable doubts that the virus was ever isolated in a scientifically correct manner. Many scientists assume now that the flu virus, or influenza A or B was merely relabeled by Mr. Global into a corona virus pandemic.
Ultimately, however, none of this matters. For the question of the severity or dangerousness of the virus is easy to answer. In the meantime, even the highly controversial WHO, which is in fact controlled by its largest donors (including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and its offshoot GAVI, which together have a stake in almost all vaccine manufacturers in the world), agrees with Prof. John Ioannidis of Stanford University, one of the most cited scientists in the world: the severity of the virus, with a so-called infection fatality rate of 0.14 to 0.15%, corresponds with that of the flu. There was no excess mortality anywhere before the beginning of the so-called vaccinations.
As far as there were isolated increases or spikes in mortality, for example in Bergamo, Italy and in New York, these are explained with massive medical malpractice: In Bergamo predominantly very old people with pre-existing conditions in nursing homes had died. Their immune systems had previously been weakened by vaccinations, and then – in order to keep the hospitals free for the panic-stricken Covid patients (who never arrived) – sick people, including influenza patients, were transferred to the elderly care homes. These then infected the weakened people there. In addition, the WHO had installed Rainieri Guerra into the Italian Ministry of Health, who falsified the data of the pandemic exercise plans: Their last pandemic exercise had not taken place in 2016, but in 2006, so that the medical professionals were unprepared. In the meantime, he is not working at the ministry of health anymore, but the Italian public prosecutor’s office is investigating him.
In New York – as every year during flu season – some, but by no means all, hospitals were overcrowded. On the hospital ship Comfort with 1000 beds available no more than 20 to 40 beds were ever occupied. In New York it also affected predominantly older people, with pre-existing morbidities. Without the panic messages in the media, many people, who would have stayed at home and cured themselves under the – correct – assumption that they were ill with a flu or a flu-like illness, stormed some of the hospitals and fell victim to either hospital germs or massive medical malpractice by for example intubation instead of receiving oxygen with oxygen masks, or with far too high dosages of Hydroxychloroquine or being treated with dangerous medications such as Remdesivir.
Of course, respiratory illnesses including this one, which is now called Covid-19 are, like the flu, dangerous diseases. And, of course, Covid-19, just like the seasonal flu, has individual, severe courses of illness and also deaths. Typically, however, the immune system intercepts the virus and especially the highly toxic spike protein in the mouth and nose. It only becomes dangerous when the immune system is bypassed and the – mind you: highly toxic – spike protein, but also other ingredients such as mRNA and lipids, and other nanoparticles, are injected directly into the body.
In any case, as post-mortem examinations carried out in Germany have shown in the meantime, the people who allegedly died with or from Covid before the start of the vaccinations – with few exceptions – had all passed the average human life expectancy and/or suffered from other serious pre-existing diseases. Virtually none of the people who allegedly died of Covid had actually died from Covid. 96% of the people who allegedly died of Covid in New York and Bergamo and 85% of those in Sweden had died from completely different diseases. [MORE]
Karen Kingston Finds Evidence Feds and WHO are Openly Planning a Global Flu Plandemic at the End of the Year. Vaccines are Already Created, Intended to Kill and Will be Mandated
/
According to Karen Kingston On October 10, 2024, members of the WHO, FDA, CDC, NIH, as well as U.S. infectious disease pediatricians, held a 6.5 hour meeting to discuss the current status and further development of vaccines for an emerging 2024-2025 H5N1 global flu pandemic. According to the WHO, the H5N1 flu has a case fatality rate of 52%.
Jerry Weir, PhD, of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation Research (CBER) clearly stated multiple times that the FDA will provide full FDA approval for H5N1 (or other H5 strands) flu vaccines if a public health emergency is declared without receiving safety or efficacy data from clinical trials.
“The scenario assumes that any strain changes recommenced by VRBPAC would be implemented during a declared pandemic, but would not require clinical data prior to the approval… In any case during the pandemic we would use the strain change and the safety, immunogenicity and even effectiveness data will come post-approval.”
Full FDA Vaccine License Approval Allows for Mass Mandates
Full FDA approval (vs emergency use authorization) of US BioPharma biological license applications (BLA) will allow federal and state governments, as well as employers, to mandate the H5N1 vaccines for adults and children alike.
The plandemic is apparently scheduled to begin in early 2025; Kingston states, “The WHO’s planned 2024-25 flu pandemic and release of highly dangerous, disease-causing H5N1 virus vaccines are fully locked and loaded by the FDA and other departments of Health Human Services (HHS). [MORE]
Karen Kingston says Feds and the WHO are Openly Planning for a Global Flu H5NI Plandemic from the Food Supply Set for the End of the Year, Vaccines Already Created, Designed to Kill and Will be Mandated
‘Big Red Flag:’ Kenya Grants Diplomatic Immunity to Racist Suspect Billionaire Bill Gates, Exempting Him from Liability and Taxes for All Activities ("Vaccines," Digital ID and GMO Mosquitoes)
/
From [HERE] Kenya last week granted diplomatic immunity to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and its employees, or “servants,” Tim Schwab reported on Substack.
Under the new status, the foundation and its employees are exempt from legal action for acts performed as part of their official foundation duties. They also are exempt from paying taxes on their salaries, and they now have the right to own property in Kenya.
“While nations around the world have long treated Bill Gates as a head of state, it’s now been practically codified into law in Kenya,” wrote Schwab, author of “The Bill Gates Problem: Reckoning with the Myth of the Good Billionaire.”
Schwab said the decision has raised “alarm bells” within the country and across the world. One public advocate, through a Freedom of Information Act request, has already petitioned the government for documents related to the decision
Others worry the decision to grant immunity may set a precedent for other billionaire philanthropists.
Concerns also have arisen that other nations will be pressured to follow Kenya’s lead and offer immunity to the Gates Foundation in exchange for continued access to the massive resources the foundation pours into other African countries.
The Government of Kenya’s announcement, Schwab wrote, comes just a week after farmer organizations and religious leaders across the continent called for reparations for the damage the foundation has inflicted on African agriculture through its so-called “green revolution” program.
They say the foundation promotes corporate, industrial agriculture at the expense of local practices and African ecosystems.
Much of the Gates Foundation’s investment in African agriculture happens through the Nairobi-based AGRA, previously known as the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa. The foundation is AGRA’s co-founder and biggest donor. It has given at least $872 million to the organization, Schwab reported.
AGRA says it “exists to fulfil a vision where Africa can feed itself,” yet it directs its funding to support input-intensive and resource-intensive agriculture.
The alliance promotes the use of synthetic fertilizers and commercial seeds controlled by Big Ag, the restructuring of seed laws to criminalize trading of seeds not certified by Big Ag, and supports seed dealers who promote corporate products.
The foundation has past financial ties to companies like Monsanto (now Bayer), whose seeds it pushed on African farmers.
Gates/AGRA’s practices have long been criticized by human rights and environmental groups in Africa and globally. And independent research shows that AGRA-supported initiatives have failed, sometimes leading to increased hunger.
Daniel Maingi, coordinator for the Kenya Food Rights Alliance, told Schwab that with Gates’ diplomatic immunity, “Kenya becomes the testing ground … That is a big, big concern. It’s a big red flag.”
“In terms of food sovereignty, as we give Gates these privileges and immunities, Africa is going to be — not food sovereign, not seed sovereign — we’re going to be slaves and masters of the big corporations,” he added.
In response to criticism about its new diplomatic immunity in Kenya, the foundation issued a statement affirming its commitment to partnering with the Kenyan government.
“Our agreement to operate in Kenya was made in alignment with the Kenyan government’s Privileges and Immunities Act. We operate according to the typical agreements Kenya makes with other foundations and nonprofits,” Buhle Makamanzi, deputy director of Global Communications for the Gates Foundation in Africa, said in the statement.
Schwab said the move by the Kenyan government and the concerns raised by critics, “get to the heart of Gates’s anti-democratic influence and power, which, at least in Kenya, appears to be reaching new levels.”
“No one ever elected or appointed Gates to lead the world — on any topic,” Schwab said. “Yet through his great wealth and his money-in-politics brand of philanthropy, he is able to buy a seat at the democratic decision-making table — and, apparently, also buy diplomatic immunity.”
Not just Big Ag — Gates investments include vaccines, digital IDs, GMO mosquitoes
Gates’ massive investment in Africa extends beyond agriculture into public health, and more recently, digital IDs in Kenya.
It also includes the “Target Malaria” project, which proposed to end malaria by introducing genetically modified or GMO mosquitoes. Critics say the program is based on “flawed ecological thinking” and “backed by the same agri-business interests that have devastated agroecological farming systems.”
Schwab also pointed to widespread criticism of Gates’ program to implement mass circumcision in Swaziland and Zambia to curb the transmission of HIV.
However, some of Gates’ most wide-reaching investments in Africa, and the global south more broadly, have been in the development and distribution of vaccines.
For example, the Gates Foundation is the topmost funder of polio initiatives worldwide. In April 2013, Gates said that eradicating polio was his “top priority,” — even though there had only been 19 cases worldwide that entire year.
Since then, there has been a global explosion in polio cases, which in 2017 the World Health Organization (WHO) admitted were caused predominantly by a strain that comes from the vaccineitself.
Critics, including many scientists working in low-income settings, have noted that as money is lavished on polio, millions of children are left vulnerable to a slew of often deadly, preventable diseases.
Gates also promoted the use of a dangerous version of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, or DPT, vaccine in Africa after it was banned in the U.S. In a video shared widely on X, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explained Gates’ work in Africa on the DPT vaccines, other vaccines and in agriculture. [MORE]
Pfizer, Moderna mRNA COVID Injections Linked to Higher Risk of Acute Heart Disease among People Aged 10 to 59
/From [HERE] People who received one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine had a higher risk of acute heart diseasecompared with those who received one dose of a non-mRNA COVID-19 shot, according to a new peer-reviewed study.
A team of South Korean researchers, who published their report on Oct. 24 in Epidemiology and Infection, said the heightened risk was most pronounced among people ages 10 to 59 compared with those age 60 and older.
The study authors analyzed the health data of 3,350,855 people who received one dose of a COVID-19vaccine from February 2021 to March 2022. The authors obtained the data from South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service (NHIS).
South Korea administered five types of COVID-19 vaccines: the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA shots, and the AstraZeneca, Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) and Novavax non-mRNA shots.
The study authors wanted to see if receiving a first dose of a particular type of COVID-19 vaccine was associated with developing acute heart disease within 21 days post-vaccination.
They also sought to determine if developing a COVID-19 infection within 21 days after the first vaccine dose was linked to a higher risk of acute heart disease.
To find out, they analyzed cardiac adverse events “including acute cardiac injury, acute myocarditis, acute pericarditis, cardiac arrest, and cardiac arrhythmia, in relation to vaccine type and COVID-19 within 21 days after the first vaccination date,” according to their report.
“The results revealed higher heart disease risk in individuals receiving mRNA vaccines than other types,” they wrote. “Individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 also exhibited significantly higher heart disease risk than those uninfected.”
The study authors didn’t find a statistically significant interaction between individuals’ COVID-19 infection status and the type of COVID-19 vaccine they received — meaning the higher risk wasn’t contingent on the person having both a COVID-19 infection and an mRNA vaccination.
However, they did find that younger people who received mRNA vaccines had a higher heart disease risk compared to those 60 and up.
Dr. Peter McCullough, who posted the South Korean study on his Substack, said public health agencies never studied the comparative safety of the different COVID-19 vaccine types.
There should be “investigations into why the agencies preferentially promoted mRNA vaccines despite their higher risk of cardiovascular events,” McCullough added.
Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense , told The Defenderthat “overall” the study was “compelling.” He said:
“Elevated risk of acute heart disease for mRNA products over others is biologically plausible, even beyond the well-established myocarditis and pericarditis.
“This study highlights the potential for a population-based approach to reveal such harms.” [MORE]
San Francisco Transit System Authorities Must Pay Nearly $8 Million to 6 Workers Fired for Refusing COVID Shots
/From [HERE] The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) must pay about $7.8 million to six former employees who lost their jobs after the district denied their requests for accommodations for religious exemptions from BART’s COVID-19 mandate.
In the largest financial win yet for workers fired for failing to comply with COVID-19 vaccinemandates, a federal jury composed of entirely vaccinated jurors on Wednesday awarded the plaintiffs between approximately $1.2 million and $1.5 million each to compensate for economic losses and mental anguish.
The case is one of hundreds filed across the country since 2021, representing thousands of workers who say they lost their jobs when their employers illegally denied their requests for religious accommodation to the COVID-19 mandate.
“These verdicts are seismic — a 7.8 San Francisco legal earthquake,” Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, which represented the plaintiffs, said in a statement. “This amazing outcome represents so much hard work by our team, perseverance by these clients, and fairness from our judicial system.”
The workers’ attorney, Kevin Snider, told The Defender that because of BART’s mandate, “The workers were forced to either deny their faith or lose their jobs.” He said they chose the latter, demonstrating the sincerity of their religious convictions.
he lawsuit began as three separate cases representing 35 employees fired by BART. The three cases were later consolidated into a single lawsuit. Twenty-nine of the plaintiffs settled with BART, but the remaining six went to trial this month.
“These workers lost their jobs and have struggled for more than two years,” Snider said. “It was a devastating disruption to their lives and to their families. Being able to settle or get a jury verdict helps them to put closure on this and for those who went to trial, they felt heard and understood by a jury, which can be important.”
This was the second time the case went to trial. The first trial ended in a mistrial in July when the jury could not reach a unanimous decision, as required in federal civil trials. [MORE]
CDC Paid Coin-Operated Black Influencers w/Money from Elites [Bill Gates, Fakebook etc] to Push COVID Shots: Myth-Information about Safety Fraudulently Induced the Public into Taking Deadly Injections
/
From [HERE] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in partnership with the CDC Foundation, funded a toolkit to train community-based organizations on how to hire influencers to combat “vaccine myths” in communities of color.
The CDC Foundation’s donor list includes the World Health Organization, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and vaccine makers including Pfizer, Merck and Johnson & Johnson.
The toolkit, first rolled out in 2022, is part of a suite of resources created by the CDC’s Partnering for Vaccine Equity Program (P4VE), which targets ethnic and racial minority communities to increase vaccine uptake by funding “partnerships” with the CDC.
P4VE’s Vaccine Resource Hub is funded through a grant for over $80 million from the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It includes toolkits, unbranded digital materials and messaging in over 50 languages.
Community organizations can use the “Influencer Guide” to help them contact influencers who can spread the organizations’ messages in the influencers’ own voices.
The guide suggests targeting mid-level influencers — those who aren’t overly famous and who are preferably “self-made” — because they’re often seen as more relatable and trusted than large brands or celebrities on social media.
These influencers can effectively act as messengers with a wide reach to promote vaccination in racial and ethnic minority communities.
To maximize their online influence, the guide recommends community organizations first identify suitable candidates with a relevant background and who haven’t made “inappropriate” posts in the past.
Once they’ve identified the right influencers, organizations can ask influencers to partner with them to spread their message about, for example, the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for people in marginalized communities. [MORE]
How COVID Injections Cause Cancer and How to Defeat It
/From [HERE] By October 2022, there was a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people.
The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels.
Pfizer’s 2022 safety report on covid “vaccines” documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations, with 3,711 cases reported by June 2022.
UK oncologist Angus Dalgleish observed aggressive cancer relapses in patients who had received covid booster vaccines, suggesting a link between the vaccines and cancer.
Canadian oncologist William Makis noted unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults, describing them as “turbo cancer” due to their aggressive nature and resistance to conventional treatments.
Pathologist Ryan Cole criticised covid injections for causing immune suppression, which impairs the body’s ability to fight cancer, and reported a significant increase in cancer cases post-vaccine rollout. Cole estimated that 17 million people have died due to mRNA injections, describing the situation as a “silent holocaust” and criticising the medical establishment for denying these deaths.
“It is important to fully appreciate the spike protein burden in the vaccinated, in order to be able to find the best strategies to reverse the risk and the damage of this toxin … The better we understand these processes, the better we will be able to defend patients and the public against the imminent coming years of record-breaking cancer rates,” Dr. Coleen Huber wrote in a recent essay.
Over the years, The Exposé has frequently published articles about the risk of vaccine-induced cancers and the increase in cancer cases after the mass rollout of the covid so-called vaccines. But many may have missed all the pieces in the puzzle, especially if they have not been following the real news as it was breaking. Thankfully, Dr. Huber has gathered all the evidence into one essay for us which we have reproduced below. In her essay, Dr. Huber explains:
– The mechanism of mRNA “vaccines” and the resulting spike protein production by people’s bodies after vaccination.
– The correlation between covid injections and certain cancers including lymphomas, glioblastomas, colorectal, ovarian and breast cancers.
– The global rise in cancer cases and mortality post-vaccination. Globally, cancer diagnoses and excess deaths have risen following the covid vaccine rollout, with a notable acceleration after booster doses, particularly affecting younger age groups. “The vulnerability is sufficient for all humans to be sure to avoid the covid vaccines,” Dr. Huber writes.
– The concerns and cautionary advice regarding vaccination for cancer patients. People, who already face cancer as a leading cause of death, should avoid covid injections.
– The impact of covid injections on immune response and antibody production and the role of Type I interferon in immune function and cancer suppression.
– The mechanisms of cancer development and the role of spike protein.
– The impact of spike protein on DNA damage and repair.
– The suppression of tumour suppressor genes by spike protein.
– The spike protein’s role in cancer growth and angiogenesis.
– The immune evasion by cancer cells and the impact of vaccination. The covid injections may weaken the immune system and allow cancer cells to evade immune detection. Tumours can evade the immune system by disguising themselves as “self,” making it difficult for the immune system to target them.
– Enhancing immune vigilance and the role of vitamin A. Vitamin A has been shown to help unmask hidden cancers, allowing the immune system to target them, and its deficiency is linked to camouflaged colorectal cancer.
– Metastasis, the spread of cancer cells to new locations in the body, and the importance of basement membrane integrity. [MORE]
