How COVID Injections Cause Cancer and How to Defeat It

/

From [HERE] By October 2022, there was a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people.

The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels.

Pfizer’s 2022 safety report on covid “vaccines” documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations, with 3,711 cases reported by June 2022.

UK oncologist Angus Dalgleish observed aggressive cancer relapses in patients who had received covid booster vaccines, suggesting a link between the vaccines and cancer.

Canadian oncologist William Makis noted unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults, describing them as “turbo cancer” due to their aggressive nature and resistance to conventional treatments.

Pathologist Ryan Cole criticised covid injections for causing immune suppression, which impairs the body’s ability to fight cancer, and reported a significant increase in cancer cases post-vaccine rollout.  Cole estimated that 17 million people have died due to mRNA injections, describing the situation as a “silent holocaust” and criticising the medical establishment for denying these deaths.

“It is important to fully appreciate the spike protein burden in the vaccinated, in order to be able to find the best strategies to reverse the risk and the damage of this toxin … The better we understand these processes, the better we will be able to defend patients and the public against the imminent coming years of record-breaking cancer rates,” Dr. Coleen Huber wrote in a recent essay.

Over the years, The Exposé has frequently published articles about the risk of vaccine-induced cancers and the increase in cancer cases after the mass rollout of the covid so-called vaccines.  But many may have missed all the pieces in the puzzle, especially if they have not been following the real news as it was breaking.  Thankfully, Dr. Huber has gathered all the evidence into one essay for us which we have reproduced below.  In her essay, Dr. Huber explains:

– The mechanism of mRNA “vaccines” and the resulting spike protein production by people’s bodies after vaccination.

– The correlation between covid injections and certain cancers including lymphomas, glioblastomas, colorectal, ovarian and breast cancers.

– The global rise in cancer cases and mortality post-vaccination.  Globally, cancer diagnoses and excess deaths have risen following the covid vaccine rollout, with a notable acceleration after booster doses, particularly affecting younger age groups.  “The vulnerability is sufficient for all humans to be sure to avoid the covid vaccines,” Dr. Huber writes.

– The concerns and cautionary advice regarding vaccination for cancer patients.  People, who already face cancer as a leading cause of death, should avoid covid injections.

– The impact of covid injections on immune response and antibody production and the role of Type I interferon in immune function and cancer suppression.

– The mechanisms of cancer development and the role of spike protein.

– The impact of spike protein on DNA damage and repair.

– The suppression of tumour suppressor genes by spike protein.

– The spike protein’s role in cancer growth and angiogenesis.

– The immune evasion by cancer cells and the impact of vaccination.  The covid injections may weaken the immune system and allow cancer cells to evade immune detection.  Tumours can evade the immune system by disguising themselves as “self,” making it difficult for the immune system to target them.

– Enhancing immune vigilance and the role of vitamin A.  Vitamin A has been shown to help unmask hidden cancers, allowing the immune system to target them, and its deficiency is linked to camouflaged colorectal cancer.

– Metastasis, the spread of cancer cells to new locations in the body, and the importance of basement membrane integrity. [MORE]

Liberal NJ Authorities Impose 2nd Class Citizenship Onto Blacks: Using Subjective Criteria, Black Applicants w/No Criminal History are Denied Gun Permits at a Rate 2.5X higher than White Applicants

/

Contrary to bignorant liberal propaganda there is really nothing complicated about the 2nd amendment. Although, the Supreme Court has made it plain that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense in public, liberal AUTHORITIES are working tirelessly to make said inalienable right illusory. The court clearly stated;

Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. As we explained in Heller, the “textual elements” of the Second Amendment’s operative clause— “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be in- fringed”—“guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. Heller further confirmed that the right to “bear arms” refers to the right to “wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.” [MORE]

2ND CLASS CITIZENSHIP From [AmmoLand] In the wake of the Bruen decision by the Supreme Court in 2022, many New Jersey residents hoped the days of restrictive firearm carry permit denials would be over.

Unfortunately, as AmmoLand News contributor John Petrolino highlights in his recent Gun Rights Policy Conference presentation, the fight for fair and equal access to gun rights in New Jersey is far from over. The issue at hand? Racial bias in the state’s gun permit process, particularly against Black applicants.

The Bruen Decision: A Game-Changer?

Let’s rewind a bit. In June 2022, the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision struck down New York’s restrictive gun permit laws, setting a national precedent for states like New Jersey. The ruling made it clear that Americans have the right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. This should have leveled the playing field for law-abiding citizens in states with strict gun laws, right?

Not exactly.

Denials Based on “Subjective Standards”

New Jersey’s response to the Bruen decision came in the form of new laws, such as the “Carry Killer” Law of December 2022, which added many “sensitive places” where guns are banned and strengthened subjective standards used to deny permits. A key statute that remains an obstacle for gun owners is N.J.S.A. 2C:58-3(c)(5), which states that authorities can deny a permit if the applicant is found to lack “the essential character of temperament necessary to be entrusted with a firearm.”

What does that even mean? Simply put, it’s vague and subjective. The problem with this is that it gives too much discretion to the people in charge of issuing permits—whether it’s a local police chief, the state police, or a Judge. They can deny someone’s permit application just because they don’t “like” them or find some reason to doubt their character. This is where things get tricky, especially when it comes to racial bias.

For more on this statute, you can read it directly here: N.J.S.A. 2C:58-3.

Racial Disparities in Gun Permit Denials: Blacks Are Denied Permits at Double the Rate!

John Petrolino uncovered some startling facts when he dug into New Jersey’s firearm permit data. According to the data (provided by the state itself), Black applicants are being denied gun permits at a rate 2.5 times higher than white applicants. That’s more than double the rate!

What’s even more shocking is that these denials are often based on non-criminal reasons, using those same subjective standards mentioned earlier. Petrolino found that Black applicants are being denied at a 2.2 times higher rate than white applicants simply based on “character” judgments. This means that Black applicants, even without any criminal background, are facing discrimination when trying to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

The data doesn’t lie, and it raises serious concerns about whether New Jersey’s apparently racisit gun permit process is fair for everyone.

Lack of Action from State Officials

When confronted with this data, New Jersey officials haven’t exactly been rushing to fix the problem. Petrolino reached out to Attorney General Matthew Platkin and Governor Phil Murphy multiple times, asking them to address the racial disparities in gun permit denials. The response? Silence.

In fact, the Attorney General’s office has refused to provide any guidance or take meaningful action to address the racial bias in the permitting process. Even though they know the data shows a clear problem, they seem content to let it continue.

This raises the question: Is New Jersey’s Democrat leadership willfully ignoring these civil rights violations?

What Needs to Change?

The numbers don’t lie. Racial bias in the gun permit process is real, and it’s a problem that needs addressing. The state should no longer be allowed to use vague, subjective standards like “character” to deny law-abiding citizens their rights. Instead, the permit process should be based on clear, objective standards, as outlined by the Supreme Court in Bruen.

Until state leaders like Attorney General Platkin and Governor Murphy take action, New Jersey’s gun owners—especially Black gun owners—will continue to face unfair barriers when trying to exercise their rights.

If you want to learn more about New Jersey’s gun permit laws and their impact, check out N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4 for the statute on carrying firearms: N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4.

Cloutlaws Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Sued Over COVID Lies: Netherlands Ct Advances Injured Plaintiffs' Claim the Public was Intentionally Misled about the Safety of COVID Shots-Makers Hid Known Dangers

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

cloutlaw – any member of the Overruling Overclass who covertly schemes or overtly acts without impunity and sans accountability (above the Lex and below the radar of jurisprudence). 2) the financial juice (if caught) to get let loose (get acquitted). 3) the jet set—set free from accountability. 4) the necessary pull to pull oneself out of deep-dish trouble.

From [HERE] A Netherlands court last week ruled that Bill Gates can stand trial in the Netherlands, in a case involving seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines.

According to Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf, the seven “corona skeptics” sued Gates last year, along with former Dutch prime minister and newly appointed NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, and “several members” of the Dutch government’s COVID-19 “Outbreak Management Team.”

Other defendants include Albert Bourla, Ph.D., CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.

“Because Bill Gates’ foundation was involved in combating the corona pandemic, he has also been summoned,” De Telegraaf reported.

According to Dutch independent news outlet Zebra Inspiratie, the plaintiffs allege that Gates, through his representatives, deliberately misled them about the safety of the COVID-19 shots, despite knowing “that these injections were not safe and effective.”

Dutch independent journalist Erica Krikke told The Defender that the seven plaintiffs — whose names are redacted in the lawsuit’s publicly available documents — “are ordinary Dutch people, and they have been jabbed and after the jabs they got sick.”

Krikke said that of the seven original plaintiffs, one has since died, leaving the other six plaintiffs to continue the lawsuit.

The lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Leeuwarden. According to De Telegraaf, “Gates had objected because, according to him, the judges did not have jurisdiction.” Accordingly, the court first “had to rule in the so-called incident procedure,” De Andere Krant reported.

Zebra Inspiratie reported that the hearing in this “incident procedure” took place on Sept. 18 and that Gates’ representatives disputed jurisdiction, but not the claim.

According to De Andere Krant, Gates was represented by the Pels Rijcken law firm, based in The Hague, described as “the largest and the premier litigation law firm in the Netherlands.” Gates did not appear at the Sept. 18 hearing, but attorneys for Gates argued that the court “had no jurisdiction over him because he lives in the United States.”

However, in its Oct. 16 ruling, the Leeuwarden court ruled it does have jurisdiction over Gates. De Andere Krant reported that the court found “sufficient evidence” that the claims against Gates and the other defendants are “connected” and based on the same “complex of facts.”

Other defendants who reside outside of the Netherlands, including Bourla, did not challenge the court’s jurisdiction.

The court ruled Gates must pay attorneys’ fees and additional legal costs totaling 1,406 euros (approximately $1,520). A hearing is scheduled for Nov. 27.

Black People in DC are 6X More Likely than Whites Residents to be Unemployed and the Net Worth of a Typical White Family is 81X that of a Typical Black Family, in City Controlled by Elite Liberals

/

According to the Economic Policy Institute, “The U.S. economy is in a strong position in the second quarter of 2024, even though the labor market is softening compared with previous quarters. The national unemployment rate rose to 4.0% in 2024 Q2, up from 3.8% in the first quarter. D.C. and California had the highest overall unemployment rates at 5.3% and 5.2% respectively, while North and South Dakota maintained the lowest unemployment rates, both at 2.0%.

Job reports through the second quarter of the year saw slight upticks in the unemployment rate from month to month, even as the labor market continued to add jobs. . .

Second-quarter 2024 trends among Black workers 

Kentucky was once again the only state with a Black unemployment rate above 10.0% in the second quarter of 2024, rising to 11.3% from 10.4%. D.C.’s Black unemployment rate was just under 10.0% at 9.9%. Among those states with large enough sample sizes for precise estimates, Maryland once again had the lowest Black unemployment rate at 3.4%, up from 3.3% in the previous quarter. South Dakota and Vermont had lower unemployment rates at 3.1% and 3.3% respectively, but those states have relatively low sample sizes that make estimates less precise. The national Black unemployment rate rose once again to 6.3% from 6.0%.

The national Black-white unemployment ratio for 2024 Q2 remained at its usual rate of 2.0-to-1, meaning that nationally once again Black job seekers were twice as likely to not find work as their white counterparts. D.C. maintained its position of having the highest Black-white unemployment ratio, though that ratio fell again in the second quarter of the year to 4.0-to-1 from 4.2-to-1. Nevada and Delaware had the lowest Black-white unemployment ratios among states with sufficient sample size for precise estimates with a ratio of 1.5-to-1—meaning Black workers were 50% more likely than white workers to be unemployed in those states. Hawaii technically had a lower Black-white unemployment ratio at 1.4-to-1, but that state has a relatively low sample size of Black workers. There are still no states where Black and white workers are equally likely to be unemployed.”

DC 2023. PHOTO IS THE PROPERTY OF VINCENT BROWN, THE UNDECEIVER

DC’s Extreme Wealth Concentration Exacerbates Racial Inequality, Limits Economic Opportunity

According to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), DC has an outsized concentration of extreme wealth relative to its overall population, according to a new report by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP). DC makes up 0.2 percent of the country’s population but has 0.5 percent of the nation’s extreme wealth – which the report defines as net worth over $30 million. Just 0.4 percent of DC tax units (roughly 1,500 households based on the number of tax filers in 2019) have net worth over $30 million, and these same tax units hold nearly half (46 percent) of all wealth in the District.  

Extreme concentration of wealth creates extreme inequality that both reflects and exacerbates racial inequality and limits economic opportunities for the majority. Across the nation, 92 percent of families holding extreme wealth are white, non-Hispanic families. This is more racially skewed than the distribution of wealth overall, of which 87 percent is held by white families. In DC, white households have 81 times the wealth of Black households and 22 times the wealth of Latinx households. [MORE]

James Carville Claims 'Males Of Color Will be Arrested if Trump Wins.' In Reality, White Liberals are Locking Up Thousands of Black Men in Grossly Disproportionate Numbers in the Cities They Live In

/

Infowars reported that MSNBC continued its daily practice of fear mongering to viewers about how Donald Trump is allegedly going to imprison his political opposition and even American citizens. While speaking to liberal probot Ari Melber Democrat Party strategist James Carville claimed that non-white men will be locked up if Trump is elected. BOO - so go vote for a Kamala, a puppet of elite whites:

“People want to know about weakness among males of color,” he said. “They’re gonna arrest all of ya! You don’t think you have a stake in this election? Guess what? You’re not gonna do very well, and I’m not gonna do well. You’re not gonna do well, alright? When the paddy wagon comes, you and I gonna be in the back of it bouncing around and it’s not gonna be very much fun.

“And they will tell you, the judge will say, ‘I’m sorry, Mr. Melber. I’m sorry, Mr. Carville. Mr. Trump said he’s gonna get rid of the Constitution, I have no choice but to enforce the Democratic norms of this country…’ It’s not far-fetched.”[MORE]

The elite, white liberal spinfidel representative Carville is either “Bignorant” and delusional or he is a racist involved in deception and on a drunken mission to trick sleeping toms. Firstly, presidents don’t have the authority to ‘get rid of the Constitution’ or to give commands to the judiciary. Secondly, whose police departments are assaulting and murdering substantial numbers of Black people with impunity in Phoenix, Aurora, Columbus, Cleveland, Minneapolis, NYC, Newark, San Francisco, DC, Baltimore, Chicago, St. Louis, LA, San Francisco, Atlanta, Louisville, Memphis, and ALL OTHER places Black people live? Whose prosecutors are filling the courtrooms and jails with Blacks in all the metro areas where most Black people live?? Is it MAGA making liberal prosecutors remove Blacks from juries EVERY DAY, thereby denying exercise of their rights as a citizen?

In The Spectacle elite white liberals are projected as the strong political allies of Black people who believe in freedom and protecting their rights. In reality, cops routinely disregard the rights of law abiding Black people and murder Blacks with impunity in cities where white liberals are in control. [MORE] To trick the power napping black “electorant,” elite white liberals often give lip service to police brutality and decarceration at election time, but liberal authorities are the main perpetrators of it.

It should be understood that whether a city is “controlled by elite white liberals” has nothing to do with the number of elected black officials or appointed black straw boss authorities in a given jurisdiction. In reality, Black people in general function as “a powerless class” having no power independent of elite whites. In nearly all liberal jurisdictions where blacks reside, elite whites control and own all major resources (such as banks, local mainstream media, major real estate, ports, utilities, large corporations and businesses, all major industry, major non-profits, unions, hospitals, etc) and own most major real estate and anything else of substantial material value.

Specifically, most black people live in metro areas. The U.S. metropolitan areas with the 30 largest African-American populations are [HERE] Everywhere one finds a large population of black people living in metro areas controlled by elite, white liberals, the police stop, use force, detain, prosecute and kill blacks in grossly disproportionate numbers. Contrary to Mr. Carville’s fear based rant, not only are elite white liberals doing nothing for Black people, they are refining the process of thoroughly dominating Blacks (with their consent);

DC

NYC

CHICAGO

BALTIMORE

BOSTON

NEWARK

PROVIDENCE

RICHMOND

MEMPHIS

COLUMBUS

CLEVELAND

CINCINNATI

CHARLOTTE

RALEIGH

ATLANTA

INDIANAPOLIS

NEW ORLEANS

ST. LOUIS

MINNESOTA

LOS ANGELES

OAKLAND

BERKELEY CA

SAN FRANCISCO

RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNADINO

HOUSTON

DALLAS

MIAMI

BIRMINGHAM

MILWAUKEE

PHOENIX

A Shamburger Meal w/an Order of Unverifiable Lies for Your Vote: Micky-Dees says No McJob Records Exists for McNegro Kamala. Massa' Media says 'No Proof is Necessary,' Dismissing Stolen McValor Drama

/

From [HERE] McDonald’s released a statement Sunday saying it has no record of Kamala Harris ever working there, as she has repeatedly claimed; the fast-food company also noted, “…we and our franchises don’t have records for all positions dating back to the 80s….”

This deepening scandal, which social media has dubbed Stolen McValor, finally got the spotlight it deserved Sunday when former President Trump spent some time making French fries and working the drive-thru at a Pennsylvania McDonald’s.

Harris has said that she worked at McDonald's one summer between her freshman and sophomore years in school at Howard University.

In defense of their servant Massa’ media mcSplained that no record means that Kamala probably worked there. The Washington Post offered the following clogic:

"There is no reason to think that Harris didn’t work at McDonald’s in 1983 and ... every reason to think that Trump’s suggestion that she didn’t is offered in bad faith and without evidence. "

Of course, Trump didn’t break this news story, he is not a media outlet - he repeated it. Also, the allegation couldn’t be in “bad faith” because McKiddies said there is no record of her ever having a McJob. Instead of engaging in actual investigative journalism, dependent media spinfidels stick to their script and dogma, thereby avoiding McTroubling reality entanglement and keeping their masters happy.

It was a win-win for the man now widely seen as the 2024 frontrunner. He had the opportunity to show off his charming side and ability to connect with everyday people while pointing to what looks more and more like a shameless lie in Kamala’s biography. [MORE]

Trump Misses Point: Regardless of Her Chromosomes, Kamala isn't a “Black” Politician b/c She Delivers Nothing of Tangible Value to Black Communities, has No Black Ideology and is Controlled by Elites

/

In general, the dependent media and its parroting black media provide an uncritical examination of all black politicians unless they go against the status quo as articulated and maintained by the elite liberal political establishment or if they otherwise defy authority in some manner. In fact, most Black politicians are lionized despite failing to deliver anything of tangible, material benefit to their black constituents or despite their obvious failure to engage themselves in the nuts and bolts work of actually solving some of the many problems plaguing Black lives.

Here, we are necessarily only talking about democrat politicians because the lone criticism offered about black politicians by the dependent media is that they are ‘republican.’ Thus, they are deemed inherently suspect and ‘not really Black.’ To elite white liberals there appears to be no other criteria for “black politics” besides “not republican.” Baked into this clogic is the ignorant, unchallenged assumption that white liberals are presumed to be “pro-black” and that liberals and blacks have interchangeable political interests by default. However, Black people are not elite white liberals – and elite white liberals are not subjected to the system of racism white supremacy or the system of authority in the manner that blacks are summarily dealt with. According to the Urban League’s report, “State of Black America,” “Black people haven’t progressed since 1965” and “the Black-White disparity persists across virtually every line or indicator of life and quality of life in the US. Black people occupy the bottom of nearly every statistical category of life and have a demonstrated 2nd class citizenship in the places they reside. If you believe the concept of “race” has no scientific validity and is merely a political classification, then addressing the myriad of unjust problems plaguing Black people and their communities should be a paramount concern and an on-going emergency. Yet, the menu of political concerns and grievances articulated by elite white liberals (environmentalism, Ukraine war, Israel wars, aborticide after the 7 month, unlimited immigration, genderplex confusion, Trump obsession, free experimental “vaccines” and “good vibes”) have nothing to do with the daily realities Black people face.

Additionally, an army of thousands of black elected and [s]elected officials (borgs) at all levels of government are not a reflection of any “black power.” Rather, they are representatives of a powerless people – powerless to prevent racists from practicing racism against them and powerless to solve their own problems. So-called “black” leaders, such as Muriel Bowser, Barak Obama, Kamala Harris, Hakeem Jeffries, Gregory Meeks, or Lori Lightfoot, are not engaged in any “black politics” nor do they espouse any “black” political theory, or do they have any articulable “Black agenda.” These highly controlled individuals function as straw bosses, black wards, vassals, quislings and puppeticians who literally ‘perform leadership’ (making great speeches, symbolic gestures but doing actually nothing) to Blacks on behalf of wealthy white interests and serve as their “human resources.” Said individuals possess black chromosomes but are otherwise indistinguishable with their liberal neuropean counterparts.

The individual political successes of black elected and [s]elected officials has not translated into power directly or somehow vicariously empowered the Black masses much in the same way successful Black athlete, celebrities and entertainers also do not tangibly empower Blacks. Rather, said coin-operated Blacks enrich the pockets of powerful whites who own and control the liberal political establishment and the sports and “enterstainment” industries. Said showcase Blacks and puppeticians alike derive and maintain their success, relevance and prestige from their usefulness and allegiance to the elite whites who function as their masters.

Don’t mistake this as an endorsement of black conservatives, who at least make a logical, written attempt to explain their theory and beliefs. Rather, it is more proof that black politics is presently devoid of accountability, goals, substance, integrity and interiority. Black politics has been rendered meaningless, no longer having any ideology besides parroting whatever is on the white liberals’ agenda. It is also part of mounting evidence that voting for elite liberals and supporting their causes has been a complete disaster for Blacks. Elite liberals and their Black probots loudly and dogmatically claim that voting will solve most of their problems. However, the quality of Black citizenship stays low where the majority of Blacks live and it does so despite high turnout by the black votary.

In reality, the evidence tends to show that elite white liberals appear to have entirely opposite interests to the substantial majority of Black people. Dems claim to be a party of “freedom” yet in the metro areas where most black people live (areas all controlled by elite, white liberals) the police stop, search, detain, and degrade Blacks in grossly disproportionate numbers. Brazen cops so frequently abuse their power that no black shopper, pedestrian, motorist, juvenile, adult or black professional of any kind—could make a rational argument that so-called constitutional rights provide black people any meaningful protection from cops in the areas where they reside. Also, despite clear Supreme Court rulings concerning the right to carry a gun in public for self-defense against criminals, liberal puppeticians and authorities prohibit Blacks from protecting themselves in the crime ridden areas they live in – the same areas in which liberal police departments fail to provide meaningful protection from criminals. As such, its not clear what dems mean by freedom – perhaps they mean freedom granted and taken away by a governmental authority, not inherent, natural freedom? Dems often talk about police reform and accountability at election time, but whose police departments are assaulting and murdering Black people with impunity in Phoenix, Aurora, Columbus, Cleveland, Minneapolis, NYC, DC, Baltimore, Chicago, St. Louis, LA, San Francisco, Atlanta, Louisville, Memphis, and many other places? Can dems be the party of decarceration when liberal prosecutors are filling the courtrooms and jails with Blacks in places such as DC, Chicago, NYC and Atlanta? Are republicans making liberal prosecutors routinely remove Blacks from juries? If dems are a party of an ‘opportunity economy’ who is denying mortgage loans, evicting Black families and making them homeless in the places where most Black live? Is it MAGA providing a servant education to Black children who can barely read, think and count when they graduate from public fool systems in places such as Detroit and Baltimore?

Nevertheless, despite all evidence to the contrary, Black people rarely question this extraordinary phenomenon and inexplicably believe that elite, white liberals are their political allies. In so doing, the Black electorant enthusiastically barks and claps for grimacing white liberals and their Black golden retrievers, such as Kamala, and thereby remain complicit in their devolution and domination.

After Substantial Effort$, Dems Succeed at Destroying Cornel West Campaign: Knocked Off PA Ballot. Trump Appointed Judge Granted Dems Request w/’Constitutional Concerns.’ Now a 'Write-In' in 20 States

/

DEMOCKERY From [HERE] A federal judge has turned down Cornel West's request to be included on the presidential ballot in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania, expressing sympathy for his claim but saying it's too close to Election Day to make changes.

U.S. District Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan said in an order issued late Thursday that he has “serious concerns” about how Pennsylvania Secretary of State Al Schmidt is applying restrictions in state election code to West.

Ranjan is a Trump appointed judge.

“The laws, as applied to him and based on the record before the court, appear to be designed to restrict ballot access to him (and other non-major political candidates) for reasons that are not entirely weighty or tailored, and thus appear to run afoul of the U.S. Constitution,” Ranjan wrote.

West, a liberal academic currently serving as professor of philosophy and Christian practice at Union Theological Seminary in New York, would likely draw far more votes away from Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris than from the Republican candidate, former President Donald Trump. West's lawyers in the case have deep Republican ties.

“If this case had been brought earlier, the result, at least on the present record, may have been different,” Ranjan wrote in turning down the request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.

An appeal will be filed immediately, West lawyer Matt Haverstick said Friday.

“This is a situation where I think, given the constitutional rights, that any ballot access is better than no ballot access,” Haverstick said. “We'd be content if Dr. West got on some ballots, or even if there was a notification posted at polling places that he was on the ballot.” [MORE]

Dems have spent substantial time and resources to destroy the Black man’s modest campaign. Thus far their efforts have paid off as West was removed from the ballot in Arizona, PA, Wisconsin, Virginia. West is on the ballot in 15 states. He is still pending certification in at least 12 states and he is a write-in candidate in 20 states. [MORE]

After the Dependent Media Used FBI Data to Quiet Public Concern Over Crime as an Election Issue, the FBI Quietly Revised its Numbers which Show Violent Crime Rose Under Corpse Biden/Dummy Kamala

/

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

gaslighting – a form of psychological manipulation through persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction and lying in an attempt to destabilize and deligitimatize a target-victim. 2) a systematic array of techniques used by a con-man designed to destroy the target’s mental equilibrium—the hapless target never suspects or believes things are being done to him, he just thinks he’s having a stroke or string of bad luck. The intent of gaslighting is to sow seeds of doubt in the targets, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception and sanity. The term comes from the 1944 Hollywood movie “Gaslight.” (See: Predictive Programming, Lies, Power, Control, CIA, FBI, MK-ULTRA, Flim-Flaminated & Amphiboly)

From [HERE] The FBI quietly revised its report of lower crime in 2022 — the second full year of the Biden/Harris administration — to show violent crime during that year actually rose 4.5 percent.

On June 11, 2024, President Joe Biden bragged, falsely claiming he and Harris’s policies had lowered crime:

You know, the year before I came to the presidency, the murder rate was the highest increase on record. Last year, we saw the largest decrease of murder in the history of (inaudible). (Applause.) And those rates are continuing to fall faster than ever. Last year, we also saw one of the lowest rates of all violent crime in nearly 50 years. Murder, rape, aggravated assault, robbery all dropped sharply, along with burglary and property crime.

On June 24, 2024, Breitbart News did a “FACT CHECK” on the FBI report showing lower crime for 2022 and noted the report was missing information from thousands of police precincts that did not report crime data.

Other outlets called out the FBI report as well and now, months later, the federal agency has corrected the record. [MORE]

Voters in Georgia, Texas & Tennessee Report Voting Machines Flipping Their Selections

/

From [HERE] Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga) first broke the issue on The Alex Jones Show on Friday, reporting that Dominion voting machines in Georgia are flipping voter selections in her district from Republican to Democrat.

“CHECK YOUR BALLOTS GEORGIA!  Reports from Whitfield County, GA that Dominion machines are flipping votes. This is exactly the kind of fraud we saw in 2020 and it cannot be tolerated. I will be working to investigate this issue and ensure the integrity of our elections in Georgia,” Greene posted on X along with the interview.

Greene explained that a voter in Whitfield County noticed that their printed ballot didn’t reflect the selections they made on the voting machine.

“This voter’s printed ballot had been changed from their selections made on the machine. Good thing they checked their paper ballot before turning it in! After several attempts of trying to change it to reflect their correct choices, they had to void the ballot and use a different machine,” Greene posted on X.

Whitfield County Board of Elections later released a statement assuring voters that the voting machine irregularity “was quickly resolved.” [MORE]

Elon Musk: The Purpose Of No Voter ID [and voting in secret] Is To Conduct Fraud In Elections

/

From [HERE] In his interview with Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk shared a wild story of his friend showing his ID at a voting precinct only to be told they can't look at it because it is now illegal in California to require an ID to vote.

ELON MUSK: So my prediction is, if there's another four years of a Dem administration, they will legalize so many illegals that are there that the next election there won't be any swing states. And it will be a single-party country, just like California is a single-party state.

That's a super-majority Dem state in California.

TUCKER CARLSON: Because of immigration?

MUSK: Yes. California was fairly reliably Republican.

CARLSON: Bill Clinton lost California in 1992 and won West Virginia.

MUSK: Yes.

So there was a 1986 amnesty. Thereafter California trended very strongly Dem, and is at this point I think 65-70% Dem, something like that. It's super-majority Dem. The California legislature is more than two-thirds Democrat.

CARLSON: Has it improved the state?

MUSK: No. It's not. And California just passed, which is shocking, it's hard to believe this is even real, but California just passed a law making it illegal to require a voter ID in any election at all in California.

You didn't know that? No. Newsom signed it into law last week. It's illegal to require an ID? In any election, even a town council.

A friend of mine who lives in Palo Alto was like, is this actually real? And he went to vote in some city council election.

He tried to show them his ID, and they said, we're not even allowed to look at your ID.

CARLSON: Have they extended the same --

MUSK: This is actually what's going on right now. By the way, they're proud of it. They're not hiding it.

CARLSON: But it's only voting. It's not buying a gun or buying liquor or buying a pack of cigarettes or flying on an airplane or renting a hotel room. It's only voting that it's illegal.

MUSK: Oh, if you try to buy a gun, they're going to ID you six ways to Sunday. Yeah. California's trying to make it basically illegal to own a gun. And the same people that demanded vaccine IDs if you want to travel or do anything are the same ones who say no voter ID is required.

CARLSON: Is there any reason to pass a law like that except to abet voter fraud?

MUSK: It's so that fraud cannot be proven. It enables large-scale fraud and no way to prove it, because how would you prove it? It's literally impossible. No ID. You're not even allowed to show your ID. It's insane. [MORE]

Massa’ Media Ignores Claims that Wooden Dummy Kamala Plagiarized 12 Sections of “Her” Book

/

From [HERE] In 2009, Kamala Harris co-authored a book called Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor's Plan to Make Us Safer. Its purpose was to outline her criminal justice policies in advance of her campaign for California attorney general.

The book has attracted the attention of conservative writer and activist Christopher Rufo, who contends that Harris and co-author Joan O'C. Hamilton plagiarized several passages. Rufo's analysis—which relies on the work of Stefan Weber, a noted exposer of plagiarism—finds that there are at least 12 sections of the book in which sentences or entire paragraphs were copied from another source without proper attribution.

"Taken in total, there is certainly a breach of standards here," writes Rufo. "Harris and her co-author duplicated long passages nearly verbatim without proper citation and without quotation marks, which is the textbook definition of plagiarism. They not only lifted material from sources without proper attribution, but in at least one case, relied on a low-quality source, which potentially undermined the accuracy of their conclusion."

Readers may disagree about the severity of some aspects of the plagiarism: Harris borrowing from her own work or not paraphrasing sufficiently. But there are more striking examples of entire passages being lifted from other sources without citation. This is definitely a no-no, and meets the standard definition of plagiarism. [MORE]

Black Man “Chooses” to be “Executed” by Injection Rather than Firing Squad. All White Jury Found Him Guilty of Murder of White Man, DA Removed All Potential Black Jurors. Supreme Ct Review Sought

/

THERE ARE ONLY FALSE CHOICES IN THE SYSTEM OF COERCION. From [HERE] Richard Moore, a Black prisoner scheduled to be murdered by authorities on Nov. 1, has chosen to die by lethal injection rather than electrocution or firing squad.

Moore's attorneys have said he never intended to kill anyone, and they've long claimed that capital punishment was not a just punishment for his crime.

Moore, 59, was convicted of murder for fatally shooting James Mahoney, a white store clerk. Moore entered a convenience store in 1999 unarmed and intending to rob the place, but a fight soon broke out between him and Mahoney, who had a gun, that resulted in Mahoney being fatally shot.  

Moore was previously scheduled for execution in 2022, and he'd chosen to die by firing squad. His execution was delayed amid legal challenges over the constitutionality of South Carolina's available murder options at the time: firing squad and electrocution. The state ran out of lethal injection drugs in 2011, effectively suspending executions.

Last year, the state was able to obtain new drugs after a 2021 law allowed officials to shield the source drug manufacturers from public disclosure. This summer, the S.C. Supreme Court ruled that firing squad and electrocution were also constitutional methods of killing the condemned.

Moore indicated his “choice” of death by lethal injection on Oct. 18, his deadline to make such a written election under South Carolina law. The paperwork was filed in the state Supreme Court, which issues execution orders.

The state's current lethal injection protocol involves a dose of the sedative pentobarbital, which is similarly used in federal executions.

With two weeks before Moore's scheduled execution, his legal team is continuing to seek a stay.

At Moore's jury trial in 2001, prosecutors struck all the Black potential jurors, resulting in his conviction and sentencing by an all-White jury. His attorneys have said his case reflects the racial discrimination that still exists in the criminal justice system. 

They've petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to step in, arguing that the removal of Black jurors from his trial was intentional and unconstitutional. The high court has not yet issued a response.

His attorneys have also asked the U.S. District Court of South Carolina to disqualify Gov. Henry McMaster from the decision of whether to grant Moore clemency. They believe McMaster — Moore's last hope outside the courts — can't objectively assess his case given the governor's previous press statements that he had "no intention" of commuting Moore's death sentence.

McMaster submitted a sworn statement with the federal court on Oct. 17, saying he will carefully study the issues presented in clemency applications before making a decision.

On Sept. 20, Freddie Owens became the first S.C. death row inmate to be executed in 13 years. Owens asked one of his attorneys to make the election for reasons of faith, and she chose lethal injection.

Alabama Authorities Murder Mentally Ill White Man [Derrick Dearman] w/Lethal Injection

/

From [HERE] The State of Alabama executed Derrick Dearman, 36, by lethal injection today, despite evidence that he suffers from serious mental illness.

Mr. Dearman was convicted of capital murder in the August 19, 2016, killing of five people in Mobile County, Alabama. That day, he had been hearing voices, believed that people were “after” him, had used a large amount of methamphetamine, and had not slept for six days.

Mr. Dearman turned himself in, and while giving a statement to police, he cried and repeatedly expressed horror and remorse for what he had done. He later said of the crime: “It was like someone else had the steering wheel.”

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey scheduled Mr. Dearman’s execution date after he sent a handwritten letter to state officials saying that he no longer wished to appeal his death sentence. Mr. Dearman has struggled with severe suicidal ideation for his entire life. But Alabama courts have repeatedly failed to adequately consider his serious mental illness.

Court filings show that, at just four years old, Derrick Dearman displayed symptoms of severe depression and spoke to his mother “about wanting to die.” He was prescribed antidepressants at age 12 and began self-medicating with crack cocaine at 14. That year, Derrick barely survived a car accident that left him feeling that he “should have died.” At 16, he started using methamphetamines, and at 19, he drove his car off the road in an attempt to kill himself. In his early 20s, he was hospitalized in a psychiatric unit. 

Mr. Dearman’s suicidal ideation continued after he was charged. In a report to the court, a psychiatric expert concluded that he was suicidal. 

But despite substantial evidence indicating Mr. Dearman suffered from lifelong and severe mental illness, including bipolar disorder with psychotic features, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic depression, and neurocognitive disorder, the trial court refused to hold a competency hearing.

Instead, even after a psychiatrist who evaluated Mr. Dearman warned that “his probable mood disorder, suicidal thinking, and brain dysfunction [are] negatively affecting his thought processes and decision-making,” making it likely “he would self-sabotage and take whatever steps he deemed necessary to ensure a death verdict,” the trial judge allowed Mr. Dearman to fire his lawyers and plead guilty to multiple counts of capital murder without an agreement from the State not to seek the death penalty.

Mr. Dearman, representing himself, initially planned on presenting no evidence to convince the sentencer he deserved to live. Because of his family’s interest in sparing his life, 11 family members testified they loved Mr. Dearman deeply, described his struggles with addiction and mental illness, and begged the sentencer to impose a life sentence. 

The trial court nonetheless sentenced Mr. Dearman to death. His family urged Mr. Dearman to appeal his death sentence in an effort to save his life. The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals denied relief and the Alabama Supreme Court refused to review the case. Then, while his postconviction petition was pending, Mr. Dearman sent a handwritten note to state officials asking them to set an execution date. The trial judge allowed Mr. Dearman, again, to fire his lawyers and then dismissed his postconviction petition, paving the way for Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey to schedule his execution.

Mental health issues permeate the capital punishment system. Even though lawmakers, mental health and legal experts, global human rights advocates, and the majority of Americans oppose executing people with serious mental illness, research suggests the death penalty actually targets this group.

Experts have found that 43% of people executed between 2000 and 2015 had a mental illness diagnosis such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or PTSD. And it is estimated that at least 20% of people on death row have a serious mental illness.

Subjecting people with serious mental illness to the death penalty raises serious legal questions about a defendant’s competency to stand trial, the validity of a guilty plea, and whether the level of moral culpability necessary for the death penalty can be assigned to people impaired by delusions, hallucinations, or other symptoms of serious mental disorders. The Constitution requires courts to resolve these questions before sentencing someone to death. 

Yet courts regularly fail to satisfy these constitutional guarantees. 

In Mr. Dearman’s case, no Alabama court even conducted a hearing to evaluate his competency to plead guilty, waive his right to counsel, or stop his appeals.

And when sentencing Mr. Dearman, the court failed to consider his history of mental illness as a reason to impose a life-without-parole sentence rather than death—an unconstitutional error that defied Supreme Court precedent explicitly recognizing that this evidence must be considered in sentencing “because of the belief, long held by this society, that defendants who commit criminal acts that are attributable to … emotional and mental problems” are often “less culpable than defendants who have no such excuse.”1 

Derrick Dearman stopped his appeals only after a lifetime of severe mental illness and suicidal behavior that Alabama courts have repeatedly ignored. The State of Alabama has now executed him despite serious questions about the constitutionality of his conviction and death sentence.

Columbus Cop Trial for Murdering Andre Hill Begins Mon. White Cop Shot Black Man Holding a Cell Phone w/Screen Lit Up, Wasn't Under Arrest. 22 Cops Denied CPR, Stepped Over His Dying Handcuffed Body

/

Everywhere one finds a large population of black people living in metro areas controlled by elite, white liberals, the police stop, use force, detain, prosecute and kill blacks in grossly disproportionate numbers. Yet Blacks rarely question this extraordinary phenomenon and inexplicably and strongly believe that elite, white liberals are their political allies who help to ‘protect their rights.’

ACLU Finds Freedom of Movement Limited for Blacks in DC [in EVERY City Controlled by Elite White Liberals w/a Large Black Population, Cops Stop and Degrade Blacks in Grossly Disproportionate Numbers]

From [HERE] A white Columbus police officer fatally shot an unarmed Black man inside a Northwest Side garage in 2020, jury selection in his trial is scheduled to begin Monday.

Columbus police officer Adam Coy, 47, is charged with murder, felonious assault, reckless homicide and two counts of dereliction of duty in the Dec. 22, 2020, shooting death of 47-year-old Andre Hill.

On December 22, 2020, 47-year-old Andre Hill was shot and killed by Officer Adam Coy of the Columbus Division of Police in Columbus, Ohio. Coy had been called to the neighborhood in response to a non-emergency call from a neighbor who reportedly witnessed someone sit in an SUV and turn the car on and off.

Hill was leaving a friend's house when Coy shot him. Hill was unarmed and was carrying just his mobile phone when he was shot on 22 December while leaving the garage of a friend, was wearing a Black Lives Matter t-shirt when he was killed.

The body camera footage shows the fatal shooting of Hill, who was a guest at the residence police responded to. Around 1:30 a.m, the video shows Hill inside a garage, walking toward Coy with a cellphone in his hand, the screen lit up and visible. Within seconds, Coy fires his weapons and Hill falls as Coy continues to ask Hill to show his hands.

Coy points his flashlight into the dark garage with his gun drawn and suddenly shoots Hill several times. An autopsy found bullets struck Hill in the chest, twice in the right thigh and an additional time in the right leg.

Coy did not have his body camera on when he got out of his vehicle and approached Hill, a clear violation of police policy. After the shooting, he turned it on, which activated a 60-second "look back" feature and recorded the shooting without audio.

Five minutes after he was shot by Officer Adam Coy, who is white, another officer can be heard in the footage saying: "Let's cuff him up. He's still moving."Mr Hill is then rolled over on to his stomach before being handcuffed and put on his back as the officers wait for an ambulance.

After Hill was shot, several officers handcuffed him while he lay unresponsive on the ground.Video recordings from Coy and others show that none of the multiple officers on the scene made an attempt to render first aid to Hill until ten minutes after he was shot

Minutes later, a more senior officer arrives and asks "anybody doing anything for him?" He then orders an officer to start CPR. Mr Hill was later pronounced dead.

"Andre Hill should be alive today," said Police Chief Thomas Quinlan in a video statement Thursday. "A Columbus police officer is responsible for his death. I can't defend it, I can't make it right, but I will do what is in my power."

His daughter Karissa Hill said "It is just disgusting how they did my dad. These pictures that I got to look at, I got to memorise my dad on the floor for the rest of my life and how nobody helped him.

"How there's 22 officers on the scene with body footage and not one of them helped my dad. It's unbearable. All because of this state, and who they hire.

"I mean, he is lying on the ground dying. I mean, what is Andre Hill's crime? Is it because he's a black man, and for whatever reason, police in America shoot first and ask questions later?"

The T-shirt Mr Hill was wearing on the night he died called for justice for Mr Floyd.

Ben Crump, the Hill family's lawyer, said officers' actions were unforgivable."Where is the humanity for Andre Hill? Where is the humanity for this Columbus citizen who had committed no crime, had no weapon, was unarmed, only holding a cell phone? Where is the humanity for this citizen?

"He offered no verbal commands before he started shooting Andre Hill. He didn't say stop. He didn't say freeze. He didn't say, put your hands up. He didn't give Andre Hill a chance. He didn't give him a chance."

The bodycam video shows Coy telling an officer leading him away from the home: "I gotta figure out what I missed".

"We'll take care of that I promise you," officer Jared Barsotti responded.

The footage also captures a woman inside the house where Mr Hill was shot telling officers that he had been bringing her Christmas money.

She shouted: "He was bringing me Christmas money. He didn't do anything."

Coy pleaded not guilty; the court set bond at $3 million. His trial was initially scheduled for March 7, 2022, but was postponed until November to allow Coy to recover from a recent hip replacement surgery. The trial was delayed a second time on November 1 to allow the defence more time to prepare a rebuttal for the prosecution's expert witnesses. The court scheduled the trial to begin on April 24, 2023, but it was delayed indefinitely on April 3 when Coy was diagnosed with cancer.

Study of 1.7 Million Kids and Teens Who Got Pfizer COVID Injections Found Myopericarditis Only in Vaxed Groups

/

From [HERE] The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine provided children and teens in England with only about 14 to 15 weeks of protection against testing positive for the virus, according to a preprint study of over 1.7 million children ages 5 to 15 in the English National Healthcare System (NHS).

Researchers investigating the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine in fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated children and teens, also found cases of myocarditis and pericarditis only in vaccinated children.

“This study clearly shows that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine provides almost no benefit to children and adolescents, but does increase their risk of myocarditis and pericarditis,” said Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense. “It begs the question: Why does the CDC continue to recommend these unlicensed shots for kids? Where is the data they use to support their statement that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”

The study found that vaccinated children required slightly fewer emergency room visits and hospital stays, but that those outcomes were extremely rare in children and teens across all groups.

There were no COVID-19 deaths among any of the study subjects.

Public health agencies in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and in the U.S. granted authorization to the Pfizer vaccines based on clinical trials that measured immunogenicity — or how well the vaccine elicited an immune response in the body — and efficacy against infection.

The trials didn’t test how well the vaccines protected against severe disease. They also didn’t assess particular safety endpoints, like myocarditis and pericarditis, which have been reported globally. [MORE]