On a 114 Degree Day Phoenix Cops Intentionally Burned a White Man's Face and Body by Holding Him Down on Scorching Pavement During a False Arrest. Committed No Crime in City Controlled by Liberals

From [HERE] On 6 July 2024, a day when temperatures in Phoenix, Arizona, reached 114F (45.5C), Michael Kenyon was walking to his local store to buy a soda when two officers of the city’s police department stopped him.

They hastily told him he was being detained, Kenyon recalls, without clearly stating why. Two more officers arrived.

Surveillance footage from across the parking lot, which was viewed by the Guardian, shows the 30-year-old on the pavement soon after, with several officers on top of him and holding him down. Once they lift Kenyon off the ground after roughly four minutes, he appears limp.

Kenyon had been burned – severely burned – on the hot city pavement. Medical records indicate he suffered third-degree burns, and hospital photos show deep burn scars and skin peeled off across his body. Kenyon has not been charged with a crime and a police spokesperson confirmed he was not the suspect that officers were seeking as part of a theft investigation.

“It felt like acid burning my skin,” Kenyon told the Guardian. “I thought of George Floyd, and I didn’t understand why people wouldn’t help me as I was screaming in pain … like I was dying.”

It’s not the first time residents in the city have accused police of burning them on the pavement. In 2019, Phoenix police department officers held Roniah Trotter, then 18, on hot pavement on a 113F day, leaving her with second-degree burns. Earlier that year, a 28-year-old man died in police custody after officers held him down on hot asphalt for several minutes.

Michael Kenyon suffered third-degree burns after an encounter with Phoenix police officers. ‘[Now] every time I see cops, I think, is he after me?’ Photograph: Courtesy of Steve Benedetto

To Steve Benedetto, a civil rights lawyer representing Kenyon, the case illustrates that the Phoenix police department has systemic problems requiring outside intervention.

In June, the US Department of Justice accused the police department of routinely discriminating against people of color and killing civilians without justification, proposing that the force be subjected to independent monitoring. The department has pushed back, asserting that it is a “self-correcting agency” that doesn’t need oversight. Earlier this month, however, the department again faced scrutiny after footage showed two white officers repeatedly punching and deploying a stun gun on Tyron McAlpin, a 34-year-old deaf Black man with cerebral palsy.

On the day of Kenyon’s arrest, Phoenix was under an excessive heat warning, an increasingly frequent occurrence in the US south. Kenyon was wearing shorts and a tank top and talking on the phone when police approached, the footage shot from across the parking lot shows.

There’s no audio, but the video shows two officers initially holding Kenyon’s arms and having him sit on the back of a parked truck.

The footage shows two additional officers arriving, and Kenyon landing on the pavement with several officers holding him down.

Grainy cellphone footage taken by a witness from above appears to capture him screaming and pleading for help, at one point appearing to say: “Please … I didn’t do anything.”

Once the officers get Kenyon off the ground, footage shows him limping and stumbling as they bring him to a police vehicle. Kenyon said one officer eventually poured water on his burns as they waited for paramedics to arrive. He said he couldn’t remember being transported to the hospital and may have lost consciousness, but recalled waking up in the hospital handcuffed to a bed.

Graphic photos from the hospital, where he stayed for weeks, show layers of skin burned off his arms, legs, chest and side of his face.

Police haven’t released body-camera footage.

“Officers made contact with Kenyon, telling him he was being detained so they could understand what may have occurred. The man struggled with police, which [resulted] with him being taken to the ground on the hot asphalt. The man sustained burns to different parts of his body from the time he was on the ground,” Scherer said. “Kenyon was determined not to be the suspect of the theft.”

He said the incident was subject to an “ongoing criminal investigation” and an investigation by the “professional standards bureau”, which investigates misconduct.

Kenyon said he believes one of his roommates may have called the police on another roommate over a potential theft.

Michael Kenyon recalls waking up in the hospital, handcuffed to a bad, after his arrest in July 2024.Photograph: Courtesy of Michael Kenyon’s lawyers

Cellphone video of one of Kenyon’s roommates in the aftermath of the incident captures her frantically calling 911 to report what had happened. “They just unlawfully detained [him] … the boy you guys just burned,” she appears to tell an operator.

After she got off the call, the video captures her explaining to police on the scene that she had been on the phone with Kenyon during the arrest and heard him scream. She sobbed and begged officers to help him: “Treat him now! Treat him, treat him!” And she told one officer: “His whole body has third-degree burns on it. [They] wouldn’t let him up … I watched him get burned … If someone did this to your son, how would that feel?”

Dr Cecilia Sorensen, director of Columbia’s global consortium on climate and health education, said when air temperatures climb above 100F, the pavement can sometimes be 40 to 60 degrees hotter: “If you have direct contact with that surface, you’re going to start getting damage to your skin.”

Pavement burns can happen within seconds, added Dr Rabia Nizamani, surgeon at the University medical center’s Lions Burn Care Center in Las Vegas: “It takes a few minutes … to get a third-degree burn that keeps you in the hospital for weeks.” Bony body parts, such as knees, are particularly vulnerable, and wounds can take months to heal, with scars that can affect a patient’s functioning for years and require additional procedures, she said.

Kenyon said he had worked in construction, door-to-door sales and other jobs that he fears he can’t do any more: “I probably will never go back to having an outside job where I have to work in the sun.”

For now, he’s been unable to work and said a roommate had been helping with bills.

“I’m speaking out because I don’t want this to happen to other people,” he added. “I want to be the last one.” He said he didn’t blame the individual officers. “Whoever trained these guys are really responsible. These guys all acted the same, so somebody drilled it into them.”

Benedetto, the lawyer, said: “A guy was walking to the store to get a soda and then minutes later he’s wondering if he’s going to die, and that’s really endemic of where this department is at. This is a department that presumably should be on its best behavior with the DoJ looming … This is the impact of their policies, procedures and training that we’ve seen over and over. There’s never any real accountability.”

Kenyon said he had struggled to process what happened.

“I don’t really want to look at my body any more,” he said, noting it was too painful to see photos from the hospital. “Every time I see myself, I have flashbacks. And every time I see cops, I think, is he after me? And I know in my head it’s not true, but it just comes up.” He said he questions whether he could’ve done something differently. “I have to keep telling myself … I didn’t deserve this.”

He added: “I just want the Department of Justice to take care of them and fix what they say they’re going to fix … I’m not trying to get attention, I just want my story to be heard because I hurt.”

Wildly Shooting at People You Can't See is Not Self-Defense. Jury Rejects White Cop's Testimony, Found Guilty of Excessive Force During Police Murder of Breonna Taylor [cop who shot her not charged]

From [HERE] A federal jury has handed down a guilty verdict in the murder case surrounding the botched arrest of Breonna Taylor

Former Louisville police officer Brett Hankison was convicted as a result, after jurors found he used excessive force during the 2020 drug raid that left Taylor dead. Hankison fired 10 shots into Taylor’s glass door and windows during the raid, but didn’t hit anyone. Some shots flew into a next-door neighbor’s adjoining apartment. Meanwhile, neither of the officers who shot Taylor - Mattingly and former Detective Myles Cosgrove - were charged in the victim's death. 

The consensus paved the way for the first conviction in the high-profile case, putting away one of four officers involved.

A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Hankison last year, while in 2022, a jury acquitted Hankison on state charges of wanton endangerment.

The conviction against Hankison carries a maximum sentence of life in prison.

All had been accused of violating Taylor's civil rights, with former Det. Kelly Goodlett this past August pleading guilty to a federal conspiracy charge for falsifying the warrant that led to the deadly chain of events.

The death of the 26-year-old black woman went on to spark protests nationwide, with activists alleging racial injustice played a part in police's actions that day.

The jury had initially indicated to the judge how they had been deadlocked on the charge of using excessive force.

The same charge had stumped a separate jury in 2022, who went on to acquit Hankison, 48, on state charges of wanton endangerment months before.

As the new jury remained deadlocked Thursday, members had sent correspondence to the judge asking whether they needed to know if Taylor was alive when Hankison fired shots into Taylor's Kentucky apartment. 

Hankison had argued he was firing to protect his fellow officers from Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, who shot at him and other officers as they broke down the woman's door. The jury rejected the cop lies.

His attorney Don Malarcik told jurors it was on prosecutors to 'prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms. Taylor was alive' when Hankison fired the shots - leading to a point of contention between jurors.

Following the inquiry, U.S. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings urged them to keep deliberating - granting them the opportunity to air the long-awaited decision on Friday.  

The six-man, six-woman jury went on to deliberate for several hours, before resurfacing Friday to give their decision.

As for Hankison, his conviction carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. He will be sentenced on March 12 by US District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. Don’t expect a serious sentence - expect racism/white supremacy or more injustice.

In Its Latest Effort to Interfere with [s]Election ‘24, Massa’ Media Conceals Kamala’s OpporTomist Economy by Ignoring the New Jobs Report which Shows a Loss of Negative 100,000 Jobs

From [HERE] With only four days to go until Tuesday’s presidential election, the poor jobs figures could not have come at a worse time for Kamala Harris.

Even allowing for the hurricanes and the Boeing strike, the employment data was weak. The consensus among analysts – who knew in advance about the special factors – was for jobs growth to ease from September’s 254,000 to 113,000 in October.

Bradley Saunders, from the consultancy Capital Economics, said: “All things considered, we suspect the upper limit for the disruptions hit was around 90,000, which means stripping them out, payrolls would only have increased by an underwhelming 102,000.”

Jobs growth for August and September was revised down by a combined 112,000 across the two months. That suggests demand for labour has eased at a crucial time.

From the Establishment Survey, the BLS reported Non-Farm Payrolls, once seasoned and adjusted for the birth/death model, increased by 12,000. Interestingly, that number was derived through government net hires adding up to a net +40,000, less a print of -28,000 for private sector net hires. 

The BLS also reported downward revisions in total of 112,000 to the August and September data. This puts net "job creation" or calling it what it is according to the Establishment Survey of -100,000. More accurately, this would be referred to as "job destruction."

Flipping over to the Household Survey, the number of people that left the civilian labor force in October was 220,000, while the number of those outside of the labor force increased by 428,000. 

The number of unemployed persons increased by 150,000, while the number of employed persons decreased by 368,000. So according to the Household Survey, October job creation/job destruction was -368,000. 

The Participation Rate slowed from 62.7% to 62.6% as the Employment to Population Ratio dropped from 60.2% to an even 60%. 

Unemployment Rates

Due to the numbers of folks leaving the labor force, the Unemployment Rate, despite the reduction in employed persons held tight at 4.1%. Due to a drop of 281,000 in the number of part-time workers, the Underemployment Rate also held steady at 7.7%. 

Let's take a look at unemployment by race, gender and education. I think at least on the educational side, the direction of unemployment may surprise some folks. 

Adult Men: Unemployment increased from 3.7% to 3.9%.

Adult Women: Unemployment held firm at 3.6%.

Teenagers: Unemployment decreased from 14.3% to 13.8%.


White: Unemployment increased from 3.6% to 3.8%.

Black or African American: Unemployment held firm at 5.7%.

Asian: Unemployment decreased from 4.1% to 3.9%.

Hispanic or Latino: Unemployment held firm at 5.1%.

Sub High School: Unemployment decreased from 6.8% to 6.6% and from 7.1% over two months. 

High School Grads: Unemployment held firm at 4.0%.

Some College or Associate Degree: Unemployment held firm at 3.4%.

Bachelor's Degree & Beyond: Unemployment increased from 2.3% to 2.5%. [MORE]

Pennsylvania News Station ‘Mistakenly’ Shows Election ‘Test Results’ of Kamala Harris Winning

From [HERE] During a Formula 1 race, a Pennsylvania news station showed election “test results” of Vice President Kamala Harris winning the state.

WNEP, a Scranton/Wilkes-Barre-based television news station, explained in a statement that “test results” showing Kamala Harris receiving 52 percent and former President Donald Trump receiving 47 percent had “mistakenly appeared on WNEP-TV” early Sunday night.

The news station explained that the numbers had been “randomly generated” and had been “sent out to help news organizations make sure their equipment is working properly.”

“Test results for the upcoming November 5 general election mistakenly appeared on WNEP-TV early Sunday evening during a broadcast of the Formula 1 Mexico Grand Prix,” the news station said. “Those numbers should not have appeared on the screen, and it was an error by WNEP that they did.” [MORE]

Supreme Ct Made it Plain, 'People Have a Right To Carry Guns in Public For Self Defense,' But Liberals Make It Impossible To Do So in the Virgin Islands (76% Black) which Has Highest Murder Rate in US

Accessories to Crime. From [HERE] The United States Virgin Islands exists as a United States territory. As an entity that is not a state, it has higher rates of homicide than any state. The homicide rates for the US Virgin Islands are about 7.8 times as high as the average homicide rate for the United States.  It has one of the highest illegal homicide rates in the world.

Extreme restrictions on the ownership and use of firearms in the US Virgin Islands are more restrictive than in any state since the implementation of the Bruen decision by the Supreme Court. The Bruen decision was published on June 22, 2022. Some states have resisted and passed very restrictive firearms laws. However, those states have a defined process.  From southerndefense.com:

The US Virgin Islands has extremely strict gun laws. A permit and waiting periods accompany all firearm transactions. Once in a person’s possession, it is almost always illegal to carry that firearm in public either openly or concealed, and as of this writing, there are no good, governmental sources for even begging a firearms permit application. Calling a local attorney for guidance will be a must given the long sentences the territorial laws have for violating its opaque firearms laws.

The territory is about 12.9% of the size of Rhode Island, with about 7.9% of the population of Rhode Island. It is 76% Black.

The United States Virgin Islands were purchased from Denmark in 1917 during the First World War. An act of Congress gave U.S. citizenship to the inhabitants in 1927. 

The number of homicides in the Virgin Islands in a given year was found in several sources, primarily stcroixsource.com and sthomasssource.com.  Population for the Virgin Islands was from the US census and worldometers.info.

The average homicide rate for the United States Virgin Islands from 1999 to 2023 is 40.6.

The average homicide rate for the United States from 1999 to 2023 is 5.21. The U.S. Virgin Islands rate is 7.79 times higher than the United States rate over the last 25 years, for which records could be found.

Hawaii has fairly similar firearms laws to those of the United States Virgin Islands. Homicide rates in Hawaii are considerably lower than the average in the United States. Hawaii homicide numbers were not found for 2022 and 2023. The average homicide rate from 1999 – 2021 was 2.16.  Puerto Rico is another island jurisdiction with strong firearms restrictions. Puerto Rico homicide rates are less than half of those in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

US Virgin Island Homicide rates are among the highest in the world. Firearms restrictions have no correlation to overall homicide rates.

If someone tells you firearm restrictions reduce murder rates in Hawaii, tell them about the US Virgin Islands. Similar firearms laws exist in both sets of Islands.  Homicide rates in the Virgin Islands are 19 times larger. 

Arizona Ballot Measure Would Allow Unlimited Abortion Throughout Pregnancy, Into the 9th Month (Aborticide)

From [HERE] A proposed amendment in Arizona would enshrine the right to abortion throughout pregnancy into the state constitution and undo the current 15-week restriction.

The abortion measure will appear on the Arizona ballot as “Proposition 139,” and is being put forward by Arizona for Abortion Access — a coalition of groups including ACLU of Arizona, Affirm Sexual and Reproductive Health, Arizona List, Healthcare Rising Arizona, NARAL Arizona, and Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona.

The measure would amend the Arizona constitution to declare that “every individual has a fundamental right to abortion” and bars the state from doing anything that:

Denies, restricts, or interferes with that right before fetal viability unless justified by a compelling state interest that is achieved by the least restrictive means.

Denies, restricts, or interferes with an abortion after fetal viability that, in the good faith judgment of a treating health care professional, is necessary to protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.

Penalizes any individual or entity for aiding or assisting a pregnant individual in exercising that individual’s right to abortion as provided in this section.

Abortion is currently restricted in Arizona after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which is when an unborn baby is believed to be capable of feeling pain. The law contains exceptions for life of the mother and serious medical emergencies. 

The Arizona Supreme Court allowed a near-total abortion ban from 1864 to go into effect over the 15-week restriction in April. However, Democrat Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs quickly signed a bill repealing the law on May 2.

Ballot measures are particularly effective as an offensive weapon because they are basically irreversible. They change a state constitution, take precedence over laws passed by state legislatures, and can only be overturned by another ballot measure or lengthy legal battles. The measures are typically propped up by left-wing organizations and affiliates with deep pockets — such as Planned Parenthood and the ACLU, out-of-state dark money groups, and billionaires with eugenicist leanings — often outspending pro-life organizations by double or triple.

Every single pro-abortion-related ballot measure since the fall of Roe has been successful. During the 2022 special elections, Kansans rejected a ballot measure that would have established that the state Constitution does not include a right to abortion. During the 2022 midterms, voters in CaliforniaMichigan, and Vermont codified abortion into their Constitutions. At the same time, voters in Montana rejected a ballot measure that would have given rights to babies born alive in botched abortions. Voters in Kentucky also rejected an amendment similar to the one in Kansas. Last November, Ohioans also voted to codify the supposed right to abortion in their state Constitution via Issue 1.

[Liberals Trade Freedom for Convenience] Omnipresent License Plate Readers in Norfolk VA Enable Unconstitutional ‘Dragnet Surveillance' that Enables Cops to Watch Everywhere You Go, Lawsuit Says

From [HERE] A new federal lawsuit filed in Virginia makes taking public transit seem even more enticing. Institute for Justice, a civil liberties organization, is suing the city of Norfolk, Virginia over its use of Flock cameras, automated license plate readers that the organization says are violating citizen’s Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. 404 Media first reported on the case.

There are currently 172 Flock cameras operational in Norfolk, which use AI to passively check the cars in their vicinity. Images are stored in a database for 30 days before being destroyed but can be downloaded within that timeframe and preserved indefinitely. 

“The City of Norfolk, Virginia, has installed a network of cameras that make it functionally impossible for people to drive anywhere without having their movements tracked, photographed, and stored in an AI-assisted database that enables the warrantless surveillance of their every move. This civil rights lawsuit seeks to end this dragnet surveillance program,” reads the lawsuit

Flock cameras have been deployed in more than 5,000 communities around the United States, and have already been used in at least one criminal case wherein prosecutors used evidence from a Flock camera to try a defendant for robbery. 

Some may argue that citizens have no right to privacy when out in the public square. But the Institute for Justice in its lawsuit points to another case in Virginia wherein the judge ordered evidence from a Flock camera be suppressed because of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. “It would not be difficult for mistakes to be made tying law-abiding citizens to crime due to the nature of the Flock system and in the event a law enforcement officer would seek to create a suspect where one did not otherwise exist, it would be a simple task,” said Judge Jamilah LeCruise.

In its lawsuit, the Institute for Justice is representing two Virginia residents as plaintiffs. One of them, Lee Schmidt, expresses concern that the police in Norfolk can use Flock cameras to easily infer his daily routine. “If the Flock Cameras record Lee going straight through the intersection outside his neighborhood, for example, the NPD can infer that he is going to his daughter’s school. If the cameras capture him turning right, the NPD can infer that he is going to the shooting range. If the cameras capture him turning left, the NPD can infer that he is going to the grocery store. The Flock Cameras capture the start of nearly every trip Lee makes in his car, so he effectively cannot leave his neighborhood without the NPD knowing about it.”

Police and criminal investigators have a constant desire for more technology to help them solve crimes, and companies like Flock benefit from the fact that law enforcement is never going to say no to more tools that make their jobs easier. But we have seen countless examples of things going awry with new surveillance technology. Already, the proliferation of facial recognition in policing has resulted in innocent individuals—particularly people of color—being wrongly detained after an AI system erroneously linked them to surveillance footage at the scene of a crime. Judge LeCruise’s concern about law enforcement mistakenly tying law-abiding citizens to a crime is not just a theoretical idea. 

There’s a constant tug-of-war between the public and law enforcement over how much access they should have to our lives. Apple famously fought hard against the Department of Justice and FBI over their demands for a backdoor into the iPhone, and it’s not hard to understand why considering how authoritarian countries have abused holes in iOS to target dissidents and others. 

Investigators were able to solve crimes before the existence of AI and smartphones—their entire job is investigating things, and they should be able to do it without deep access into our personal lives. They can find potential witnesses, request CCTV footage from businesses, swab for fingerprints, or one of the many other things investigators did in the past to solve crimes. Any attempt to increase surveillance capabilities should be viewed with skepticism at the very least because of the power imbalance and real ability to harm innocent people’s lives. Sure, maybe the Flock cameras can help locate stolen rental vehicles faster. But is that worth the trade-offs?

NYC Dumbocrats Love FreeDumb: To Destroy People’s Right to Carry a Gun for Self Defense on the Dangerous Subway, NYPD is Subjecting Riders to Unconstitutional Searches w/Malfunctioning Gun Scanners

The Supreme Court made it clear that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to POSSESS and CARRY arms for self-defense in public. “The public” includes unsafe, crowded places like the NYC SUBWAY. HOWEVER, AN EXCEPTION IS THE “SENSITIVE PLACES DOCTRINE,” which prohibits carrying A gun in places deemed HISTORICALLY SENSITIVE and/or particular place’s sensitive government interests or vulnerabilities.

‘factors which make places “sensitive” might be a place where most persons therein are minors (K-12 schools), places that concentrate adversarial conflict and can generate passionately angry emotions (courthouses, legislatures, polling places), or buildings containing people at acute personal risk of being targets of assassination (many government buildings). 

HOWEVER, a place is not a sensitive place simply because it is crowded. In fact, it is common sense that in a busy, crowded place a law abiding citizen is more likely to be confronted by criminals. Nevertheless, A RECENT NY law bans handguns in places of a “sensitive nature,” which overbroadly includes all public transit AMONG OTHER THINGS [MORE]. An estimated 54% of households in NYC do not own a car, and rely on public transportation everyday. [MORE] All such persons, millions of people, cannot lawfully defend themselves with a gun, a core purpose of the 2nd Amendment. As such, said right is rendered 2nd class status under NY’s new law. ADDITIONALLY there is apparently no longstanding historical record of prohibiting peaceable gun carry on public transportation. [MORE]

TOTALITARIANISM IS A REBELLION AGAINST FREEDOM. From [HERE] Back in March, NYC Mayor Adams announced that gun detectors from Evolv Technology would be tested in subway stations as an extra security measure for commuters. The pilot program started at the Fulton Street Station on July 27 and moved around over a 30-day trial period. 

This week, the NYPD announced the results of that test run, telling City & State Thursday that the technology, which conducted 2,749 scans at 20 different subway stations, recovered 12 knives, but no guns. Police also reported 118 “false positives,” according to the news site.

In response to the numbers, Legal Aid Society released a statement saying those false alarms compromised the safety of riders. “This is objectively a failure, no matter how hard City Hall tries to spin this data,” the organization said. “We hope that this ill-conceived, fraught, and unwanted idea is finally shelved for good.” 

Other civil advocacy groups such as the New York Civil Liberties Union have spoken out strongly against the program. They believe scanning New Yorkers without reasonable suspicion violates the Fourth Amendment, which forbids unreasonable searches and seizures. 

“Subjecting New Yorkers to suspicionless searches by the police every time they need to ride the subway is an unconstitutional violation of our Fourth Amendment rights and a waste of money,” said Daniel Lambright, senior staff attorney at the NYCLU. These advocacy groups also feel the technology is unnecessary, especially because Adams himself has confirmed there’s been a major decrease in subway crime. 

The mayor has previously said he was considering expanding the use of the gun detectors. At a press conference in August, he said future use of the technology would be based on the results of the pilot run, but called the program “very impressive.”

“I know the commissioner,” he said at the time, referring to Deputy Commissioner of Operations Kaz Daughtry, “is going to release the actual data and then make the determination, do we go to next steps?”

According to Evolv Technology’s website, its weapon detectors are “AI-driven” and use “safe, ultra-low frequency, electromagnetic fields, and advanced sensors to detect concealed weapons.” Through image alarms, it can capture still and motion pictures of potential threats, and claims to have scanned over 1 billion people, and to have detected 400,000 weapons reported by customers in 2023.

Evolv says one of its customers, Windsor Regional Hospital, which has reported over 1,100 items intercepted since the installation of the system, including hundreds of knives. Evolv has over 750 other customers, with gun detectors installed in schools, healthcare facilities, and the facilities for over 40 major sports teams. 

Last year, the Utica City School District (UCSD) in upstate New York pulled back on its purchases with Evolv after multiple instances of failed weapon detection, and lawsuits emerged after an Evolv detector failed to prevent a student from entering school with a knife and stabbing another student.

The company disclosed in February that it was being investigated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The city’s own Department of Investigation is also looking into how Mayor Adams chose Evolv for the pilot launch, according to the Daily News, which also reported that the city was getting use of the scanners for its test run free of charge. 

This summer, City Limits’ CLARIFY youth journalists spoke to transit riders and advocates to get their thoughts on the use of weapon scanners in the system.

Christopher Drummond, a 21-year-old college student who was interning in the city this summer, commuting from Connecticut to Grand Central Station every day, told City Limits at the time that while he believes advanced technologies such as AI in security systems are not necessarily bad, they still create a sense of unease for commuters, himself included. 

“Seems a little eerie,” said Drummond. “I don’t think there’s necessarily anything wrong or harmful with having it, except for the fact that, like, you know, it’s like a big brother, it’s kind of weird.” 

The Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P) has also criticized the plan, calling the detectors “knockoff TSA [Transportation Security Administration] checkpoints.” 

“Once again, Mayor Adams is peddling pseudoscience,” said Albert Fox Cahn, the executive director of S.T.O.P, who called the pilot “such a bad idea.”

“Evolv is facing scrutiny and litigation from every angle,” he added. “People love the idea of a magical machine, but they’ll be furious at the reality of long lines and endless errors.” 

Riders Alliance, an organization dedicated to fighting for better New York City subways, also shared criticisms, saying gun detectors in the transit system would be inefficient. 

“It’s logistically impossible to keep weapons off the subway using airport-style detection systems,” said Danny Pearlstein, the group’s policy and communications director.

“The subway has 472 stations and thousands of entrances. Riders show up to catch the train without a moment to spare. It’s not a venue where people arrive hours early and get food and drinks before enjoying entertainment nor is it a tightly controlled environment like an airport,”  Pearlstein said. “The best way to keep weapons out is to send a consistent and clear message that no one needs to arm themselves to safely board the train.”

Sharif Hall, an organizer with the New York City Community Action Project, views the detectors as Adams’ way of maintaining a pro-police agenda instead of dealing with the real problems that impact the subway system. 

“This unreliability makes them not only a wasteful display of security theater, but an active threat to the safety of New Yorkers. Reliance on these gun detectors can only lead to disastrous situations where police punish innocent people for a machine’s mistake,” Hall said.

“They don’t prevent weapons from being carried into the subway system, they misidentify harmless objects as weapons, and they represent a massive invasion of privacy of the millions of New Yorkers who need to ride the subway to get to work, school, or to go about their lives.”

False Flaggots Feign Outrage Over Wash Post’s Fake Non-Endorsement of Kamala to Push the Illusion of a Divergent, Free Press; Instead of the Single Source Propaganda Owned by Elites that It Really is

Breitbart reports that Former Biden Blight House Adviser and black quisling Susan Rice melted down on X after the Washington Post refused to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris, marking a highly embarrassing moment for her campaign.

Rice, who critics said actually was a de facto president under Biden, blasted the leftist outlet in a series of tweets Friday afternoon, first saying she is “disgusted.”

“As a DC native and lifelong subscriber to the Post, I’m disgusted. You have lost us,” she wrote in her first post.

Other representatives and spokespersons of elites had similar reactions through the weekend. [MORE]

There was no “melt down” - this is all false flaggot theater; there is no mystery as to who the WashPost endorses. After spending vast resources and substantial time invested in bashing Trump, calling him a different derogatory term every month for the past 6-8 years in thousands of “news” articles and after cheerleading for their puppet/golden retriever Kamala since her [s]election, it is obvious who the Washington Post endorses. In the face of widespread criticism of massa media’s one sided coverage of the election, a goal here is a sarcastic attempt at maintaining the necessary illusion of an independent, divergent free press engaged in objective “journalism” providing reliable, sourced information and fact based opinion. In reality, massa’ media is the Dependent Media - a tool of elite persons that espouses the views of the vested interests. It conceals reality and seeks to project a curated and manufactured reality from the point of view and in light of the elite’s ideology and does so to advance their control and vast power over people. Massa’ media is not simply the fourth estate of the government, which is also owned and controlled by powerful elites, it is much more - possibly the most powerful organization known to humans. Malcolm X stated, “The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” Similarly, the neo-feudal review stated, ‘the power of the mainstream media isn’t simply immense - it may be almost absolute and sets the parameters of what constitutes reality for most people.” The great rebel Dr. Amos Wilson further explained,

The most effective means of disseminating and reproducing ideas in society, and in the Afrikan American community in particular, is to have that community perceive their dissemination and reproduc­tion as the work of disinterested, unbiased, non-manipulative, liberal yet authoritative, White American individuals, groups, or institutions, or as flowing from sources independent of the marked influence of the powerful. Thus, White America strongly pushes and projects the powerful mythology of independent, liberal American media, universi­ties, and other information processing establishments. That is, America loudly congratulates itself for what it calls its "free press" and mass media which permit the free exchange of ideas. Most Black Americans utilize White media and these factors as their primary, if not sole, source of information. Most are not mindful of the fact that the American press and mass media are privately owned, profit-making, White elite-controlled corporations. The press is one among other institutions, "and one of the most important in maintaining the hegemony of the corporate class and the capitalist system itself," advances Parenti. [MORE]

If the press cannot mold our every opinion, it can frame the perpetual reality around which our opinions take shape. Here may lie the most important effect of the news media: they set the issue agenda for the rest of us, choosing what to emphasize and what to ignore or suppress, in effect, organizing our political world for us. The media may not always be able to tell us what to think, but they are strikingly success­ful in telling us what to think about .... [MORE]

Along with the COVID plandemic, election 2024 coverage has functioned as a highly observable episode of what Dr. Blynd calls “single source propaganda.” (also see book by Michelle Stiles). Single source propaganda refers to the uniformity of the entire mainstream media covering the same information in the same manner without any dissent or contradiction - a synchronization that seeks mass conformity, uncritical examination of information, obedience and artificial dogmatic acceptance. Like magicians, massa’ media declared Kamala “brand new” and poof she became free from any accounting for any Blight House failures or her abject failures to deliver anything of tangible value to Black communities. Most importantly, they re-invented her, pretending she was an entirely different person the day before, because the media said so. Kamala is a wooden dummy of the elites and she only speaks when they speak through her, with their hand up her ass.

According to FUNTIONARY

The Media – the Spectacle-Cabal who love freedom of the press, but abhor freedom of speech. The Media is the Fourth Estate of Government (created, owned, administered and controlled by Pathocrats). It is one of the most essential arms of “government.” They couldn’t give you their Matrix Reality without it—likewise they couldn’t keep you imprisoned in it without it. The News Anchor holds down the Ship of State at the Port of Lies. How is it that shareholders of Media conglomerates also sit as anchors and bring you their master’s views as if it could ever be objective or news? “The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” ~ Malcolm X. (See: Television, Perception, MEDIA, Senses, CON, Normal, Pathocracy, NEWS, Corporate Media, Control, COG & Pixelated People)

mass media – “Massa’ Media. Massa’s media plus (+) Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses. 2) The “Mess” Media. 3) wholesale retale— retelling the whole tale (propaganda) exactly as you’re told, consistently and relentlessly. How can you possibly relate when you are framed by the very debate wherein you are an unwilling spectator? Let’s be perfectly clear on this. There’s no counteroption or outlet to vent when you’re under the controlled thoughtform of mass-think manufactured consent. “Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.” ~A.J. Liebling. (See: Media, T.V., Mass, Alienation, Spectacle Society, NEWS, ABCTV, Propaganda, Legislation & The New God Economy)

Black Citizens Can’t Hire, Fire or Decline "Public Service" from Uncontrollable Race Soldiers: NYPD Tossing Out Hundreds Of Misconduct Cases w/o Even Looking at Them in City Controlled by Liberals

From [HERE] The New York Police Department has tossed out hundreds of civilian complaints about police misconduct this year without looking at the evidence.

The cases were fully investigated and substantiated by the city’s police oversight agency, the Civilian Complaint Review Board, and sent to the NYPD for disciplinary action. They included officers wrongfully searching vehicles and homes, as well as using excessive force against New Yorkers.

In one instance, an officer punched a man in the groin, the oversight agency found. In another, an officer unjustifiably tackled a young man, and then another officer wrongly stopped and searched him, according to the CCRB.

The incident involving the young man was one of dozens of stop-and-frisk complaints the NYPD dismissed without review this year — a significant development given that the department is still under federal monitoring that a court imposed more than a decade ago over the controversial tactic.

The practice of killing cases without review began three years ago as a way to cope with escalating caseloads that were approaching a deadline for discipline. But ProPublica found it has become more frequent under Police Commissioner Edward Caban.

The commissioner may not be in his position for long. He is under pressure to resign after his phone was seized in a federal corruption investigation. He has also faced criticism for failing to hold officers accountable for misconduct.

Since he took office last July, the NYPD has ended without review more than 500 incidents, about half the cases the oversight board referred to it, according to an analysis of board data. That rate has climbed to nearly 60% this year. Under Caban’s predecessor, Keechant Sewell, the department faced roughly the same number of cases, but about 40% were tossed without review. (Neither Caban nor Sewell responded to requests for comment.)

After Substantial Effort$, Dems Succeed at Destroying Cornel West Campaign: Knocked Off PA Ballot. Trump Appointed Judge Granted Dems Request w/’Constitutional Concerns.’ Now a 'Write-In' in 20 States

DEMOCKERY From [HERE] A federal judge has turned down Cornel West's request to be included on the presidential ballot in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania, expressing sympathy for his claim but saying it's too close to Election Day to make changes.

U.S. District Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan said in an order issued late Thursday that he has “serious concerns” about how Pennsylvania Secretary of State Al Schmidt is applying restrictions in state election code to West.

Ranjan is a Trump appointed judge.

“The laws, as applied to him and based on the record before the court, appear to be designed to restrict ballot access to him (and other non-major political candidates) for reasons that are not entirely weighty or tailored, and thus appear to run afoul of the U.S. Constitution,” Ranjan wrote.

West, a liberal academic currently serving as professor of philosophy and Christian practice at Union Theological Seminary in New York, would likely draw far more votes away from Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris than from the Republican candidate, former President Donald Trump. West's lawyers in the case have deep Republican ties.

“If this case had been brought earlier, the result, at least on the present record, may have been different,” Ranjan wrote in turning down the request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.

An appeal will be filed immediately, West lawyer Matt Haverstick said Friday.

“This is a situation where I think, given the constitutional rights, that any ballot access is better than no ballot access,” Haverstick said. “We'd be content if Dr. West got on some ballots, or even if there was a notification posted at polling places that he was on the ballot.” [MORE]

Dems have spent substantial time and resources to destroy the Black man’s modest campaign. Thus far their efforts have paid off as West was removed from the ballot in Arizona, PA, Wisconsin, Virginia. West is on the ballot in 15 states. He is still pending certification in at least 12 states and he is a write-in candidate in 20 states. [MORE]

After the Dependent Media Used FBI Data to Quiet Public Concern Over Crime as an Election Issue, the FBI Quietly Revised its Numbers which Show Violent Crime Rose Under Corpse Biden/Dummy Kamala

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

gaslighting – a form of psychological manipulation through persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction and lying in an attempt to destabilize and deligitimatize a target-victim. 2) a systematic array of techniques used by a con-man designed to destroy the target’s mental equilibrium—the hapless target never suspects or believes things are being done to him, he just thinks he’s having a stroke or string of bad luck. The intent of gaslighting is to sow seeds of doubt in the targets, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception and sanity. The term comes from the 1944 Hollywood movie “Gaslight.” (See: Predictive Programming, Lies, Power, Control, CIA, FBI, MK-ULTRA, Flim-Flaminated & Amphiboly)

From [HERE] The FBI quietly revised its report of lower crime in 2022 — the second full year of the Biden/Harris administration — to show violent crime during that year actually rose 4.5 percent.

On June 11, 2024, President Joe Biden bragged, falsely claiming he and Harris’s policies had lowered crime:

You know, the year before I came to the presidency, the murder rate was the highest increase on record. Last year, we saw the largest decrease of murder in the history of (inaudible). (Applause.) And those rates are continuing to fall faster than ever. Last year, we also saw one of the lowest rates of all violent crime in nearly 50 years. Murder, rape, aggravated assault, robbery all dropped sharply, along with burglary and property crime.

On June 24, 2024, Breitbart News did a “FACT CHECK” on the FBI report showing lower crime for 2022 and noted the report was missing information from thousands of police precincts that did not report crime data.

Other outlets called out the FBI report as well and now, months later, the federal agency has corrected the record. [MORE]

Voters in Georgia, Texas & Tennessee Report Voting Machines Flipping Their Selections

From [HERE] Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga) first broke the issue on The Alex Jones Show on Friday, reporting that Dominion voting machines in Georgia are flipping voter selections in her district from Republican to Democrat.

“CHECK YOUR BALLOTS GEORGIA!  Reports from Whitfield County, GA that Dominion machines are flipping votes. This is exactly the kind of fraud we saw in 2020 and it cannot be tolerated. I will be working to investigate this issue and ensure the integrity of our elections in Georgia,” Greene posted on X along with the interview.

Greene explained that a voter in Whitfield County noticed that their printed ballot didn’t reflect the selections they made on the voting machine.

“This voter’s printed ballot had been changed from their selections made on the machine. Good thing they checked their paper ballot before turning it in! After several attempts of trying to change it to reflect their correct choices, they had to void the ballot and use a different machine,” Greene posted on X.

Whitfield County Board of Elections later released a statement assuring voters that the voting machine irregularity “was quickly resolved.” [MORE]

Elon Musk: The Purpose Of No Voter ID [and voting in secret] Is To Conduct Fraud In Elections

From [HERE] In his interview with Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk shared a wild story of his friend showing his ID at a voting precinct only to be told they can't look at it because it is now illegal in California to require an ID to vote.

ELON MUSK: So my prediction is, if there's another four years of a Dem administration, they will legalize so many illegals that are there that the next election there won't be any swing states. And it will be a single-party country, just like California is a single-party state.

That's a super-majority Dem state in California.

TUCKER CARLSON: Because of immigration?

MUSK: Yes. California was fairly reliably Republican.

CARLSON: Bill Clinton lost California in 1992 and won West Virginia.

MUSK: Yes.

So there was a 1986 amnesty. Thereafter California trended very strongly Dem, and is at this point I think 65-70% Dem, something like that. It's super-majority Dem. The California legislature is more than two-thirds Democrat.

CARLSON: Has it improved the state?

MUSK: No. It's not. And California just passed, which is shocking, it's hard to believe this is even real, but California just passed a law making it illegal to require a voter ID in any election at all in California.

You didn't know that? No. Newsom signed it into law last week. It's illegal to require an ID? In any election, even a town council.

A friend of mine who lives in Palo Alto was like, is this actually real? And he went to vote in some city council election.

He tried to show them his ID, and they said, we're not even allowed to look at your ID.

CARLSON: Have they extended the same --

MUSK: This is actually what's going on right now. By the way, they're proud of it. They're not hiding it.

CARLSON: But it's only voting. It's not buying a gun or buying liquor or buying a pack of cigarettes or flying on an airplane or renting a hotel room. It's only voting that it's illegal.

MUSK: Oh, if you try to buy a gun, they're going to ID you six ways to Sunday. Yeah. California's trying to make it basically illegal to own a gun. And the same people that demanded vaccine IDs if you want to travel or do anything are the same ones who say no voter ID is required.

CARLSON: Is there any reason to pass a law like that except to abet voter fraud?

MUSK: It's so that fraud cannot be proven. It enables large-scale fraud and no way to prove it, because how would you prove it? It's literally impossible. No ID. You're not even allowed to show your ID. It's insane. [MORE]

Massa’ Media Ignores Claims that Wooden Dummy Kamala Plagiarized 12 Sections of “Her” Book

From [HERE] In 2009, Kamala Harris co-authored a book called Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor's Plan to Make Us Safer. Its purpose was to outline her criminal justice policies in advance of her campaign for California attorney general.

The book has attracted the attention of conservative writer and activist Christopher Rufo, who contends that Harris and co-author Joan O'C. Hamilton plagiarized several passages. Rufo's analysis—which relies on the work of Stefan Weber, a noted exposer of plagiarism—finds that there are at least 12 sections of the book in which sentences or entire paragraphs were copied from another source without proper attribution.

"Taken in total, there is certainly a breach of standards here," writes Rufo. "Harris and her co-author duplicated long passages nearly verbatim without proper citation and without quotation marks, which is the textbook definition of plagiarism. They not only lifted material from sources without proper attribution, but in at least one case, relied on a low-quality source, which potentially undermined the accuracy of their conclusion."

Readers may disagree about the severity of some aspects of the plagiarism: Harris borrowing from her own work or not paraphrasing sufficiently. But there are more striking examples of entire passages being lifted from other sources without citation. This is definitely a no-no, and meets the standard definition of plagiarism. [MORE]

Alabama Authorities Murder Mentally Ill White Man [Derrick Dearman] w/Lethal Injection

From [HERE] The State of Alabama executed Derrick Dearman, 36, by lethal injection today, despite evidence that he suffers from serious mental illness.

Mr. Dearman was convicted of capital murder in the August 19, 2016, killing of five people in Mobile County, Alabama. That day, he had been hearing voices, believed that people were “after” him, had used a large amount of methamphetamine, and had not slept for six days.

Mr. Dearman turned himself in, and while giving a statement to police, he cried and repeatedly expressed horror and remorse for what he had done. He later said of the crime: “It was like someone else had the steering wheel.”

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey scheduled Mr. Dearman’s execution date after he sent a handwritten letter to state officials saying that he no longer wished to appeal his death sentence. Mr. Dearman has struggled with severe suicidal ideation for his entire life. But Alabama courts have repeatedly failed to adequately consider his serious mental illness.

Court filings show that, at just four years old, Derrick Dearman displayed symptoms of severe depression and spoke to his mother “about wanting to die.” He was prescribed antidepressants at age 12 and began self-medicating with crack cocaine at 14. That year, Derrick barely survived a car accident that left him feeling that he “should have died.” At 16, he started using methamphetamines, and at 19, he drove his car off the road in an attempt to kill himself. In his early 20s, he was hospitalized in a psychiatric unit. 

Mr. Dearman’s suicidal ideation continued after he was charged. In a report to the court, a psychiatric expert concluded that he was suicidal. 

But despite substantial evidence indicating Mr. Dearman suffered from lifelong and severe mental illness, including bipolar disorder with psychotic features, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic depression, and neurocognitive disorder, the trial court refused to hold a competency hearing.

Instead, even after a psychiatrist who evaluated Mr. Dearman warned that “his probable mood disorder, suicidal thinking, and brain dysfunction [are] negatively affecting his thought processes and decision-making,” making it likely “he would self-sabotage and take whatever steps he deemed necessary to ensure a death verdict,” the trial judge allowed Mr. Dearman to fire his lawyers and plead guilty to multiple counts of capital murder without an agreement from the State not to seek the death penalty.

Mr. Dearman, representing himself, initially planned on presenting no evidence to convince the sentencer he deserved to live. Because of his family’s interest in sparing his life, 11 family members testified they loved Mr. Dearman deeply, described his struggles with addiction and mental illness, and begged the sentencer to impose a life sentence. 

The trial court nonetheless sentenced Mr. Dearman to death. His family urged Mr. Dearman to appeal his death sentence in an effort to save his life. The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals denied relief and the Alabama Supreme Court refused to review the case. Then, while his postconviction petition was pending, Mr. Dearman sent a handwritten note to state officials asking them to set an execution date. The trial judge allowed Mr. Dearman, again, to fire his lawyers and then dismissed his postconviction petition, paving the way for Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey to schedule his execution.

Mental health issues permeate the capital punishment system. Even though lawmakers, mental health and legal experts, global human rights advocates, and the majority of Americans oppose executing people with serious mental illness, research suggests the death penalty actually targets this group.

Experts have found that 43% of people executed between 2000 and 2015 had a mental illness diagnosis such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or PTSD. And it is estimated that at least 20% of people on death row have a serious mental illness.

Subjecting people with serious mental illness to the death penalty raises serious legal questions about a defendant’s competency to stand trial, the validity of a guilty plea, and whether the level of moral culpability necessary for the death penalty can be assigned to people impaired by delusions, hallucinations, or other symptoms of serious mental disorders. The Constitution requires courts to resolve these questions before sentencing someone to death. 

Yet courts regularly fail to satisfy these constitutional guarantees. 

In Mr. Dearman’s case, no Alabama court even conducted a hearing to evaluate his competency to plead guilty, waive his right to counsel, or stop his appeals.

And when sentencing Mr. Dearman, the court failed to consider his history of mental illness as a reason to impose a life-without-parole sentence rather than death—an unconstitutional error that defied Supreme Court precedent explicitly recognizing that this evidence must be considered in sentencing “because of the belief, long held by this society, that defendants who commit criminal acts that are attributable to … emotional and mental problems” are often “less culpable than defendants who have no such excuse.”1 

Derrick Dearman stopped his appeals only after a lifetime of severe mental illness and suicidal behavior that Alabama courts have repeatedly ignored. The State of Alabama has now executed him despite serious questions about the constitutionality of his conviction and death sentence.