Another Olympic Athlete Drops Dead. Sprinter Tori Bowie RIP [Coincidence Theorists Believe There is Nothing Unusual About the Substantial Number of People Dying Since the mRNA Vax Rollout]
/
Tori Bowie, a sprinter who won three medals at the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro and the next year won the world championship in the 100-meter dash with a stunning comeback, has died. She was 32.
Her death was confirmed in a statement on Wednesday by U.S.A. Track and Field, which provided no other details.
The Orange County, Fla., sheriff’s office said in a statement that its personnel went to a house in Winter Garden, Fla., on Tuesday to check on a woman in her 30s who had not been seen or heard from in several days. They entered the home and found the body of a woman, whom they tentatively identified as Frentorish “Tori” Bowie. The statement said “there were no signs of foul play.”
At the 2016 Olympics, Bowie won a gold medal in the 4x100 relay, anchoring a team with Tianna Bartoletta, Allyson Felix and English Gardner that finished the race with a time of 41.01. She won the silver medal in the 100-meter dash and bronze in the 200-meter. [MORE]
DeSantis Signs Bills Permanently Banning Deadly mRNA COVID "Vaccine" and Mask Mandates in Florida
/From [HERE] Governor Ron DeSantis was in Destin Thursday morning signing his "Prescribe Freedom" legislation.
The bills permanently ban vaccine and mask mandates in Florida.
That includes government offices, schools and workplaces.
They also protect physicians who offer treatments other than those recommended by federal agencies.
"These restrictions and these mandates, the purpose of them was not to safeguard your health. The purpose was to control your behavior," DeSantis said.
The legislation also bans vaccine passports, gain of function research, and formally rejects world health organization recommendations in Florida.
Inducing Public Consent: US and UK Government docs reveal confidentiality agreements were made to Hide Injurious Reactions to COVID Shots from the Public
/STORY AT-A-GLANCE
U.S. and U.K. health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to COVID-19 shots and emphasized their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic
The news was revealed in 57 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) records via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
A government email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering COVID-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy
Regulatory filings show Pfizer knew of its shots’ waning effectiveness in April 2021 but didn’t publicly acknowledge it until late July 2021
Preclinical studies for Pfizer’s COVID shots also warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles, but the trial reported it was “completed with no safety concerns”
From [HERE] In the days leading up to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 shot, an agreement was made to keep serious adverse reactions under wraps. U.S. and U.K. health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to COVID shots and emphasized their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic.1
The news was revealed by Judicial Watch, which obtained 57 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) records 2 via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. Initially, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request in August 2021 that specifically asked for: 3
“All emails sent to and from members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee regarding adverse events, deaths and/or injuries caused by investigatory vaccines for the prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19 currently produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and/or Johnson & Johnson.”
The request was ignored, prompting the lawsuit that ultimately revealed the confidentiality agreement between U.S. and U.K. regulators. "Why are we engaged in a secret deal to keep secret information about adverse events related to the vaccines?" Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton asked. "I just think it's troubling. The documents speak for themselves." 4
US and UK Officials Make Pact to Keep Safety Issues Quiet
The pact was revealed in a series of email exchanges from December 2020. Initiated by Jonathan Mogford, policy director of the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and sent to FDA commissioner Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Judicial Watch reported: 5
“As background, Mogford includes information on “two cases of anaphylactoid reactions in individuals with a strong past history of allergic reactions….” Marks replies to Mogford: “It would be very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional details [redacted] from MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency] under the terms of our mutual confidentiality agreement.”
Mogford later replies, “… attached are [redacted] hope that’s helpful in the meantime. If I can just remind — information shared under our confidentiality agreement.””
An email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering COVID-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy. According to Judicial Watch: 6
“The CDC’s Dr. Amanda Cohn emailed Office of Vaccines Research and Review Director Marion Gruber and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks with the subject line “Coadministration of COVID-19 Vaccines with Other Vaccines During Pregnancy.”
Gruber writes, “I am fine with this language.” Marks then responds to Cohn and her CDC colleague, Sarah Mbaeyi, “I can live with this too. Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know. Thanks.”
Cohn replies, “We have a meeting with Rochelle [presumably CDC Director Rochelle Walensky] at 3:30 about if we should say anything or wait until we have more definitive information. I will let you know where we land. I’m not sure there is a right answer.””
“It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over, albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the COVID vaccines that the public has every right to know,” Fitton said in a news release. “This disturbing batch of new documents have uncovered a secret confidentiality agreement tied to COVID vaccine safety issues and emails that raise new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.” 7
Pfizer Hid Data on Lack of Effectiveness
After initially claiming in late 2020 that its COVID-19 shots were 95% effective, Pfizer’s COVID shots turned out to have rapidly waning protection of just 39%. 8 That figure was reported in July 2021 by the Israeli Ministry of Health. 9 Pfizer echoed the “declining trend in vaccine efficacy” in late July 2021, 10 but regulatory filings from April 2021 show Pfizer knew of the shots’ failures months earlier.
“It’s clear from the documents that these analyses were almost 4 months old by the time they became public,” Peter Doshi, associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, told Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., a former medical scientist with the University of Adelaide and former reporter for ABC News in Australia. 11
“It’s disappointing that neither Pfizer, nor regulators, disclosed these data until it was too obvious to ignore new outbreaks in Israel and Massachusetts, which made it clear that vaccine performance was not holding up,” he said. 12
Even Pfizer’s six-month phase III trial data, released April 1, 2021, stayed silent on the shots’ waning efficacy. 13 And, at that time, health officials were still claiming that the shot would stop COVID-19 transmission. In May 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci stated “when you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health ... you become a dead end to the virus.”
As Doshi explained, “Publicly disclosing that efficacy waned so soon after authorization might have undermined the credibility of authorities, who’d been projecting great confidence about the vaccines’ ability to end the pandemic.”14
But instead of transparency and supporting informed consent so Americans could make their own choice about the shots with all the data, Demasi reported: 15
“Within weeks of Pfizer publishing its data on waning efficacy, President Biden ordered all federal workers (and employees of contractors) to get vaccinated within 75 days, otherwise they’d face punishment or have their employment terminated.”
Shots’ Effects on Brain Known Since 2020
mRNA COVID-19 shots teach your cells to produce a protein, or piece of protein, that triggers an immune response, including the production of antibodies. 16 However, because natural mRNA is easily broken down, this means the experimental gene therapy needs a special delivery system to make it to the body’s cells.
The shots use lipid nanoparticles that contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) 17 for this purpose. The mRNA is wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that carry it to your cells, and the LNPs are “PEGylated” — that is, chemically attached to PEG molecules to increase stability. 18
Usually, if you were to inject RNA into your body, enzymes would immediately break it apart, but the COVID-19 shots are specifically designed so that doesn’t happen. While it was originally advertised that COVID-19 shots “stay in the arm,” Pfizer knew since at least November 2020 that the shots may influence the brain.
Pfizer contracted Acuitas Therapeutics to conduct animal studies, which found LNPs from COVID-19 shots rapidly traveled to other areas, including the brain, eyes, heart, ovaries and other organs.19 20
Naturopath Colleen Huber explained: 21
“Now that we have LNPs with their mRNA payload delivered past the BBB and into the brain, what do they do once they arrive to the fluid surrounding neurons? The rest is an easy journey for LNPs. Neurons take up LNPs — and they do so very efficiently, at 100 percent uptake, by means of apolipoprotein E, and usually without immune reaction at that point.
Apolipoprotein E is abundant in the brain — it is produced by astrocytes. The mechanism of uptake is endocytosis, in which the membrane of the neuron engulfs or swallows the approaching LNP. That has been observed since at least 2013. In this way, the Trojan Horse content of the LNP is delivered, because it was contained in a benign-seeming — to the neuronal membrane — package.”
A number of neurological injuries have been reported following COVID-19 shots, including ischemic stroke, Bell’s palsy, tinnitus and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. As for one mechanism of brain injury, Stephanie Seneff, a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), believes genetic modifications introduced by COVID-19 shots may induce immune cells to release large quantities of exosomes into circulation.
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles that contain protein, DNA, RNA and other constituents, and may contain mRNA along with spike protein. According to Seneff and colleagues: 22
“[W]e present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.
We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.
We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage.”
COVID Shots Melting Muscles
Preclinical studies for Pfizer’s COVID shots also warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles. Writing in DailyClout, Dr. Robert Chandler reported:23
“The Pfizer documents 24
contain results from a 17-day study of repeat dose injections of BNT162b2 [Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot] in Wistar Han rats. Myonecrosis and inflammation were identified histopathologically. The appearance was described as “Jellied” (Table 3), which is what rhabdomyolysis might look like after 17 days.”
Despite this and other concerning findings, including fibrosis, inflammation and myofiber degeneration present at the injection site, Chandler explains, “How was this data presented at the December 10, 2020, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting regarding the Emergency Use Authorization for BNT162b2? … Completed with no safety concerns.” 25
A review of data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) also revealed a dramatic increase in reports of rhabdomyolysis following the rollout of COVID-19 shots. In fact, Chandler reveals: 26
“79% of all reported rhabdomyolysis cases occurred in the two complete years (2021 and 2022) after the EUA was approved in December of 2020 … A dramatic, 37-fold increase in the annual rate of cases of rhabdomyolysis occurred after mass inoculation with Spike Producing Genetic Therapy Products began in December 2020. COVID-19 (2020) did not cause an increase in rhabdomyolysis reporting in VAERS compared with years 2001-2020.”
A number of case reports have since been published of “COVID-19 mRNA vaccination-induced rhabdomyolysis,” including in a 16-year-old male two days after his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot 27 and a 21-year-old male one day after his first COVID-19 shot. 28
The findings that Pfizer and government officials were aware of serious adverse events and waning effectiveness of COVID-19 shots but neglected to share this with the public will only further undermine trust in public health authorities.
As Martin Kulldorff — co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which scientifically critiqued the effects of prolonged lockdowns in response to COVID-19 — told Demasi, “In public health, it is important to be honest with the public. Pfizer should have reported the declining vaccine efficacy in its April 1, 2021, press release, which they clearly knew about at the time.” 29
Likewise with the numerous reports of adverse events linked to the shots, which have now been linked to an explosion of excess deaths.
Steve Kirsch: The FDA knew on September 17, 2021 that people who got COVID Injections were 2X more likely to be infected
/
From [HERE] Executive summary. The Cleveland Clinic study, which I fully explain in this article, shows that the more vaccines you get, the more likely you are to be infected with COVID.
This was not a fluke. As I pointed out in my article, the results were consistent with three other large studies, two of which (the Qatar and Pfizer studies) were general population and not just healthcare workers.
One of the two large confirming studies was the Pfizer Phase 3 trial participants themselves.
Did you know that Pfizer told the FDA in a document dated September 17, 2021 that people who were on the vaccine for a longer period were more likely to be infected with COVD than those who spent only about half the time in the vaccinated state. The difference between the infection rates of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed was more than 2X. See this section of my article for details on data in the FDA document and the simple calculation to determine the relative infection rates.
The bottom line is that the FDA knew on Sept 17, 2021 that you were more likely to be infected with COVID if you were vaccinated. That’s the opposite of what they told us.
What do we do now?
We need to acknowledge our mistakes and take corrective action.
Every business who has a vaccine mandate should immediately issue a reverse mandate.
For example,
Hospitals should immediately fire anyone who is vaccinated with the COVID vaccine. Proof of being unvaccinated should be required to keep your job. Religious and medical exemptions should be honored so if anyone’s religious beliefs require them to be vaccinated, those people should be accommodated. Similarly, if anyone has a medical condition requiring them to be vaccinated, they should be given an exemption.
College campuses should not allow students who are vaccinated to enroll. In addition, all visitors to campus will need to show proof of unvaccination. In short, if you are vaccinated, you should no longer be allowed on campus.
Proof of unvaccination should be required to enter restaurants and attend public gatherings.
If you are not an American citizen, you should not be able to enter the US without proof of unvaccination.
Unvaccination should be required to hold elective office.
All emergency personnel (police, fire, paramedics) must be unvaccinated or face losing their job.
All doctors who advised their patients to get vaccinated should have their license to practice medicine revoked by the medical boards. Their board certifications and hospital privileges should be removed as well. After all, these physicians are a danger to society because they lack the ability to think for themselves and do what is best for their patients.
Doctors who write vaccine prescriptions for the COVID vaccine shall be investigated and may have their license to practice medicine revoked. After all, the COVID vaccine isn’t justifiable for any patient so you must be a very bad doctor who doesn’t believe in evidence-based medicine.
Other than as noted above, there should be no tolerance for the vaccinated. These people should have known better. They are a risk to society and prevent us from getting to herd immunity. They should be ostracized and excluded from all family events moving forward. [MORE]
Michael Palmer, MD: Alternate mechanisms of mRNA vaccine toxicity: which one is the main culprit?
/This paper summarizes the mode of action of mRNA vaccines, as well as three potential pathogenetic mechanisms that may account for the toxicity observed with the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, namely: chemical toxicity of lipid nanoparticles, direct toxicity of the spike protein, whose expression is induced by the vaccines, and the destructive effects of the immune response to the spike protein. The case is made that of these mechanism the third is likely the most important one. If this conclusion is correct, then essentially the same level of toxicity must be expected with future mRNA vaccines against any other pathogenic microbes. [MORE]
To Create the Illusion of Widespread Support Pfizer Gave Millions to ‘Independent’ Groups (medical associations, consumer groups and civil rights organizations) to Push Irrational COVID Vax Mandates
/
From [HERE] Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer in 2021 made numerous grants to medical associations, consumer groups and civil rights organizations for the purpose of creating the appearance of widespread support for COVID-19 vaccine mandates, investigative journalist Lee Fang reported.
As the vaccine mandates rolled out in 2021, Pfizer stayed quiet on the question of mandates — but public health groups, patient advocacy groups, doctors’ associations, community groups and others, along with the Biden administration, actively advocated for vaccine mandates as a key measure to protect public health.
New disclosures from Pfizer, posted by Fang on his Substack, show that many of these same groups were taking money from Pfizer while they promoted the idea that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were “safe and effective,” despite a lack of scientific data to back those claims.
Prominent groups on the extensive list of those who took Pfizer funding while pushing the mandates included the Chicago Urban League, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the National Consumers League, The Immunization Partnership, the American Pharmacists Association, the American College of Preventive Medicine, the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy, the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the American College of Emergency Physicians.
Many groups did not disclose their ties to Pfizer.
“[These groups] set the nature of the debate,” Fang told comedian and political commentator Russell Brand on a recent episode of “Stay Free.” “They appear in the news media, they create events and they create a discourse that looks authentic, that looks organic, but it benefits the bottom line of their benefactors, of companies like Pfizer.”
Fang said many of these organizations, particularly civil rights organizations like the Chicago Urban League or the National Consumers League — which actually has a Pfizer lobbyist on its board — have powerful influence precisely because of their independent status.
When these groups speak out, Fang said:
“It affects how regulators see these issues and how the public sees them. When they see these third-party groups that have some credibility — these are famous organizations that are known for standing up for the public interest.
“When they say ‘hey these mandates are a good idea for the American public,’ it seems genuine.
“But they aren’t disclosing the Pfizer money, which is a relevant factor when you are talking about a policy that compels Americans to take this product.”
After the COVID-19 vaccines became widely available in early 2021, vaccine mandates followed in different forms across the country.
At the federal level, the U.S. Department of Defense mandated vaccines for military personnel, and the Biden administration mandated vaccines for federal contractors and for all employers with 100 employees or more — the latter was struck down in federal court.
Universities mandated vaccination for students and staff, and many public and private employers across the country mandated vaccination for their employees.
Several school districts across the country planned to mandate vaccination for children to attend school, but most of those plans have since been rolled back.
Those who instituted mandates justified them by asserting that mass vaccination — and only mass vaccination — would “stop the spread” of COVID-19.
But it has since been revealed that in March 2021, when Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky publicly and unequivocally stated on MSNBC that vaccinated people would not get sick, there was no evidence to support her statement.
In fact, the CDC had to walk back the statement a few days later.
Biden also falsely claimed that the vaccinated would not get infected — in July 2021, just before COVID-19 vaccine mandates went into effect.
The vaccine makers have since acknowledged they never tested whether the vaccines would stop transmission, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that vaccinated people in both Pfizer and Moderna’s clinical trials contracted the virus.
Big Pharma’s big reach
Pfizer isn’t the only actor in Big Pharma that quietly funds third parties to do its work.
Fang told The Defender that “Many pharmaceutical firms covertly shape public opinion and regulations through the use of front groups and financial relationships with community organizations.”
For example, Purdue Pharma covertly funded third-party advocacy groups to encourage looser criteria for prescribing its highly addictive opioid painkillers, he reported.
As for Pfizer, Fang said, third-party funding is just one of the many strategies the drugmaker deployed to drive COVID-19 policymaking.
“Pfizer flexed its lobbying muscles around many COVID-19 policies, including efforts to curb drug-pricing initiatives and a bid to prevent the creation of generic COVID medications,” he said, adding, “The vaccine mandate debate is yet another example of Pfizer’s reach into public policy.”
Big Pharma — along with the Biden administration and its intermediaries — also lobbied to suppress those who questioned the vaccine program.
Pfizer BioNTech and Moderna pressured Twitter and other social media platforms to set moderation rules that would flag purported COVID-19-related “misinformation,” as part of the effort to drive the national conversation about the COVID-19 vaccines, Fang reported as part of the “Twitter files.”
“Pharma is unique in the raw amount of money they spend to control the entire public sector on regulatory, on policy, on everything in terms of how it affects medicine as it is practiced in the United States,” Fang said.
The pharmaceutical and health products lobby is one of the biggest industry lobbies. According to OpenSecrets.org, last year alone the industry spent $372 million lobbying Congress and federal agencies, outspending every other industry — and each year it increases its spending.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is on the board of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the top individual lobbying spender in the industry, which spent $29.2 million last year. Pfizer itself spent more than any other drug company.
The industry also spends massive amounts of money on advertising. Pfizer alone spent nearly $2.8 billion on advertising for all of its products in 2022.
The COVID-19 vaccines netted $37.8 billion for Pfizer in 2022, up from $36.7 billion in 2021. The company’s overall earnings hit a record $100 billion.
Big Pharma and the CDC did similar work to promote mandates and vaccination
There is a “revolving door” between pharma industry lobbyists and the government — nearly 65% of lobbyists formerly worked for the government.
And the strategies used to build support for Big Pharma’s products are some of the same strategies used by federal government agencies like the CDC.
Since 2021 — the same time Pfizer started funding community groups — the CDC has doled outhundreds of millions of dollars in grants for the creation of “culturally tailored” pro-vaccine materials and for training “influential messengers” to promote COVID-19 and flu vaccines to communities of color in every state across the country.
For those grants, the CDC sought out community organizations that would communicate the CDC’s message without the CDC’s trademark, so the messages would appear to come organically from within local communities rather than from the government, particularly among communities of color.
In another case, the CDC hired a public relations firm to write what looked like news articles but were actually ad placements created to persuade parents of young children and elderly people — with a focus on Spanish speakers — to get vaccinated.
Both Pfizer and the CDC used their funding to target black and Latino communities that had lower vaccination rates. In one case, they both funded the same organization — the National Hispanic Medical Association (NHMA).
According to Fang, the organization worked with a public relations firm called Culture ONE Worldto distribute “press releases and media placements” that “called on employers of essential workers to mandate COVID-19 vaccines.”
Fang also wrote that the NHMA also signed joint statements lobbying in favor of Biden’s vaccine mandate and that “it received $30,000 from BIO [Biotechnology Innovation Organization], a vaccine industry lobby group that represents Pfizer and Moderna, IRS filings show.”
The Defender found that NHMA received $2,070,000 in two annual grants so far for their “Vacunas! Si Se Puede, Immunization Campaign for Hispanics” program, which later became “We Can Do This,” to create culturally tailored content to be circulated throughout Latino communities.
American Academy of Pediatrics received multiple grants from Pfizer in 2021
The AAP also appeared on Fang’s list of notable organizations that received direct Pfizer funding.
“The American Academy of Pediatrics was one of the most visible organizations working to build public support for vaccine mandates. The organization received multiple, specialized grants from Pfizer in 2021.
“Pfizer also provided grants to individual state chapters of the AAP earmarked for lobbying on vaccine policy. The Ohio AAP chapter, for instance, lobbied the Ohio legislature against bills to curb coercive COVID-19 vaccine policies, while receiving an ‘immunization legislation’ advocacy grant from Pfizer.”
Beyond its COVID-19 vaccine mandate work, the organization also was a public advocate for COVID-19 vaccines for children. Its then-president, UCLA professor Moira Szilagyi, M.D., Ph.D.,publicly advocated, on media outlets such as CNN, for vaccinating children.
The organization, “dedicated to the health of all children,” previously issued policy guidance to its members stating that it is an “acceptable option to pediatric care clinicians to dismiss families who refuse vaccines.”
And in June 2022, the AAP issued a press release applauding the CDC’s recommendation of “safe, effective COVID-19 vaccines” for babies as young as 6 months old, despite concerns raised — by the FDA vaccine advisory commission, among many others — regarding a lack of clinical data for the vaccines in children.
In addition to the Pfizer funding, the AAP receives much of its funding directly from the CDC, raising questions about the organization’s ability to act independently, particularly with respect to vaccine recommendations, BMJ editor Peter Doshi wrote in 2017.
FDA Complicit in at Least 10M Deaths by Distorting Info about Ivermectin and Vitamin D3 (the Lie that ‘there were No Safe/Effective COVID Treatments’ Enabled Emergency Use Authorization for COVID Vax)
/
From [JOEL SMALLEY] The FDA (that’s the most influential public health agency in the world if you didn’t know) is responsible for the most egregious disinformation
Joining the collaboration of those conspiring against safe and effective early treatments like ivermectin, the FDA is responsible for the preventable “COVID” deaths and all those caused by the (truly “dangerous and lethal”) “vaccine” that could not have been granted EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation) in the presence of a safe and effective alternative. That’s more than 10 million by my estimation.
So, while the rest of us were being deplatformed and put on terrorist watchlists for sharing the truth about the benefits of early treatment and harms of the “vaccine”, especially for young people and pregnant women, this FDA tweet still remains. Exhibit 1, your “honour”
2 for the Nuremburg II trials that will never happen. [MORE]
Another Study Demonstrates Ivermectin is One of the Safest and Cheapest Drugs for COVID in the World
/JOEL SMALLEY explains, here is yet another definitive study on the effectiveness of one of the safest and cheapest drugs FOR HUMANS in the world - ivermectin.
Desort-Henin et al., 5 Jan 2023 was a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled*. It does not come better than that.
The SAIVE Trial, Post-Exposure use of ivermectin in Covid-19 prevention: Efficacy and Safety Results
Violaine Desort-Henin, Anna Kostova, Elmozafar Ahmed Babiker, Audrey Caramel, Richard Malamut
This study demonstrated highly statistically significant evidence in a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that daily oral treatment with ivermectin reduced the risk of infection following exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
Ivermectin was also shown to be safe in doses and duration higher than currently used in approved indications. [MORE]
FDA says new vaccines no longer have to prevent infection or transmission in order to be approved
/
From [HERE] In order to qualify for approval as a “vaccine,” a pharmaceutical injection does not have to actually prevent infection with or transmission of any disease, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) publicly revealed this week.
Peter Marks, a top FDA official, issued a statement explaining that the “FDA’s authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration or the prevention of infection or transmission.”
In other words, a vaccine does not have to actually do anything to gain FDA approval. All that apparently has to happen is for a drug company with deep pockets to pay the agency enough money to buy that rubber stamp approval, unlocking an endless stream of profits.
(Related: Last spring, the FDA finally admitted that the covid “vaccines” it authorized and approved do, in fact, cause blood clots.)
CDC likewise redefined “vaccine” to include drug injections that do nothing
Traditionally speaking, an FDA-approved vaccine had to at least purport to prevent infection with or transmission of a disease. The whole point of a vaccine was to fight disease, we were long told.
Then came the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) and its associated “vaccines” and everything changed. Now, a vaccine can be just about anything, or nothing – it does not matter, just so long as the FDA and Big Pharma get paid for their efforts.
For years, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) claimed that a vaccine had to “produce immunity” in order to qualify as a vaccine. A vaccination, the agency said, involves the injection of an infectious organism “in order to prevent the disease.”
Just like the FDA, the CDC changed its definition of a vaccination post-covid to a drug injection that basically does nothing.
In recent months, the Coalition Advocating for Adequately Labeled Medicines (CAALM), comprised of a group of experts, has been calling on the FDA to clarify its definition of vaccines after the fiasco known as Operation Warp Speed ran its course.
“There is a widespread (but inaccurate) notion that efficacy against infection and transmission have been established by substantial evidence, and that these vaccines contribute to herd immunity,” CAALM said in a statement, pointing to false claims from fake president Joe Biden, Rochelle Walensky, head of the CDC, and Tony Fauci that covid injections prevent sickness and spread – which they do not, we now know.
Biden, for example, lied to America back in 2021 when he claimed that “you’re not going to get covid if you have these vaccinations.”
These and other statements by regime kingpins prompted CAALM to request from the FDA “language clarifying that phase III trials were not designed to determine and failed to provide substantial evidence of vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 transmission or death must be added to labels.”
The FDA ultimately denied CAALM’s request, claiming that its allegations against Biden, Walensky, and Fauci were just “selected statements by U.S government officials suggesting that vaccination against COVID-19 may prevent infection or transmission.”
“In responding to your Petition, we are not agreeing or disagreeing with any of the statements that are selected in the Petition,” Marks wrote in response to the request.
“Rather, we are observing that the statements referenced by the Petition do not demonstrate a commonly held belief that the clinical trials provided substantial evidence of efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We are not convinced that there is any widespread misconception about this.”
To this very day, Walensky is still going around claiming that, at one point, covid jabs somehow did prevent transmission and symptomatic illness, even though they clearly do absolutely nothing beneficial in those who take them.
