Racist Suspect Reporter [Diana Moskovitz] Attacks Jim Brown with Racist Smear Article on Deadspin.com [fuck them too]

From [HERE] Out of nowhere reporter, Diana Moskovitz, a racist suspect, wrote an article on Deadspin trashing Jim Brown about allegations that he beat women over 12 years ago. She then detailed other allegations of abuse going back 50 years ago - including details from a 911 call from 1999. She writes:

For decades, Jim Brown has served sportswriters as a kind of shorthand for the type of activist an athlete should be. Just yesterday, Brown was upheld as an inspiration in William C. Rhoden’s farewell column in theThe New York Times; name-dropped for helping receiver Josh Gordon return from his indefinite suspensionfor weed and alcohol (even NFL commissioner Roger Goodell got in on the action); and cited by The Undefeated as an example of when athletes “were outspoken on the country’s problems, particularly the status of African-Americans.” Meanwhile, one SportsCenter segment had Brown blessing Carmelo Anthony’s recent activism, while another was devoted to Brown calling in to praise Jordan’s $2 million donations to address police-involved shootings.

He is also a man who has been accused of and investigated for beating or raping women at least six times over several decades, a period of time spanning from the 1960s through 2000. Of those cases, three resulted in charges that were tried before juries; the three other cases were dropped when the women said they didn’t want to pursue charges or witnesses stopped cooperating. 

Brown is an emblematic figure who’s presented the way he is because he stands, as much as anyone now living, at the intersection of the athletic and political. He is also a man who has been accused of and investigated for beating or raping women at least six times over several decades, a period of time spanning from the 1960s through 2000."  

She then implies he is a rapist still on the loose,

"Similarly, a rapist can be the exact picture of what’s considered a fine model citizen until getting caught." [MORE]

huh? Never mind the fact that all the abuse charges were either dropped or dismissed by courts after jury trials (not plea deals), her point is let's trash Jim Brown today, a Black man, because he is Black. For real, there is no other point. If she wanted to make a point about domestic violence surely there were other ways to do this. That is, its not news; there are no new allegations pending against Brown and he has not interjected himself into new projects involving violence. Her topic here is pretextual. Racists simply attack to destroy anyone that Blacks might look up to - especially anyone who cannot be filtered out or away properly [free thinking negroes, non-robotics] and anyone who tries to help Black people.

Why do such a thing? Neely Fuller explained that "most white people hate Black people. The reason that most white people hate Black people is because whites are not Black people. If you know this about white people, you need know little else. If you do not know this about white people, virtually all else that you know about them will only confuse you." [MORE] and [MORE]. 

Moskovitz's out of the blue regurgitation of facts no longer in dispute also fits in with the white supremacist logic of criminalizing all Black males - to justify treating them criminally. Racists are deeply attached to beliefs in fantasy like this. This logic is being discussed by whites now to justify the overpolicing and oppression of Blacks by its bored, heavily equipped and revenue generating police forces. The idiocy behind this stupidness is that "there is no innocent Black male, just Black male criminals who have not yet been detected, apprehended or convicted." [MORE] Like Jim Brown, who apparently is just a thug with cash who beat charges in court. White people don't think of themselves like this. White folks are naming milkshakes & burgers after Ben Roethlisberger. 

This criminlaization of all Black men logic makes this article OK to put on its website for Deadspin. As Amos Wilson has explained this kind of labeling is necessary to dehumanize Blacks in this refined system of  white supremacy. The same logic was used to justify slavery in a less refined system of white supremacy. It "is a prelude for the rationalization of his economic exploitation, and ultimately, a prelude to the Eurocentric murder of the African population." [MORE] 

We do not control anything in a system of white supremacy but ourselves and our minds. Do not participate in or support anything that degrades, demeans or destroys Black and Latino people. Fuck Deadspin.com.