From [HERE] A U.S. House of Representatives committee report revealed the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ $900 million “We Can Do This” COVID-19 campaign was flawed and claimed COVID-19 shots prevented transmission despite the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stating there was no such evidence.

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) shifting mask guidelines and reversals on recommendations damaged public trust, with changes appearing politically motivated rather than based on scientific evidence.

• The government aggressively promoted COVID-19 shots for children despite low-risk levels, using emotional manipulation and fear-based messaging through the Fors Marsh Group PR firm.

• Clinical trial studies showed significant bias in measuring COVID-19 shot effectiveness, with case-counting window bias making ineffective shots appear 50% to 70% effective.

• Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials revealed higher risks of serious adverse events than initially reported, with Pfizer showing 36% higher risk compared to placebo groups.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee released an assessment of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) COVID-19 public health campaign, revealing it was fraught with miscalculations that set the stage for widespread public distrust.

In December 2020, the FDA granted emergency use authorization (EUA) to the first COVID-19 shots, yet these authorizations clearly stated there was no evidence the shots prevented viral transmission.

Despite this, the administration launched the “We Can Do This” campaign, spending over $900 million to promote vaccine uptake and public health measures.

However, foundational issues plagued the campaign from the beginning. Past contracts and fiscal mismanagement within HHS raised red flags about the effectiveness and integrity of their public relations, or PR, efforts.

As the campaign aimed to shape public behavior around masking, social distancing and vaccination, the reliance on flawed CDC guidance undermined its credibility.

By allowing CDC recommendations to drive public messaging, the administration sowed confusion and mistrust.

These early failures were not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of inconsistent and politically influenced public health strategies that ultimately eroded the very trust needed to effectively manage a public health crisis. [MORE]